An Exercise in Theoretical Archaeology: Do Archaeological Cultures Exist?

Archaeological culture still persists as a basic analytical and interpretative concept in Serbian archaeology despite criticism. This paper presents a formal view of archaeological cultures and explores the epistemological implications of this formalization. Formal analysis of archaeological cultur...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Marko Porčić
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FR SR
Publicado:	University of Belgrade 2016
Materias:	archaeological theory archaeological culture typology evolutionism Anthropology GN1-890
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/cbef340189684a40a4c7ac9c73ac187a
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:cbef340189684a40a4c7ac9c73ac187a
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:cbef340189684a40a4c7ac9c73ac187a2021-12-02T06:07:02ZAn Exercise in Theoretical Archaeology: Do Archaeological Cultures Exist?10.21301/eap.v8i3.20353-15892334-8801https://doaj.org/article/cbef340189684a40a4c7ac9c73ac187a2016-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://eap-iea.org/index.php/eap/article/view/183https://doaj.org/toc/0353-1589https://doaj.org/toc/2334-8801 Archaeological culture still persists as a basic analytical and interpretative concept in Serbian archaeology despite criticism. This paper presents a formal view of archaeological cultures and explores the epistemological implications of this formalization. Formal analysis of archaeological culture is achieved through logical and quantitative explication of the traditional definition of archaeological cultures. The main result of the formal analysis is that there are real patterns of formal variability of material culture that may or may not correspond to traditional archaeological cultures. These patterns are real only in the analytical sense – they are real for given input data and scale of analysis. Unlike the traditional approach where this patterns are equated with archaeological cultures which are furthered interpreted in essentialist terms or as quasi- organic entities such as ethnic groups, it is claimed here that discovered patterns are only the starting point – the empirical situation that needs to be accounted for in anthropological an historical terms. This paper shows how patterns that are traditionally identified as archaeological cultures can arise as a consequence of an entire range of processes – different social and historical realities. The main conclusion is that the traditional concept of archaeological culture is not useful neither as analytical or interpretative tools for two reasons: 1) traditional cultures are subjectively defined entities with no theoretical justification for the criteria used in their definition and 2) the empirical pattern cannot be an explanation in itself because it is the thing that needs to be explained. Cultural evolutionary (transmission) theory is proposed as a general framework for defining and interpreting patterns of formal variability of material culture in time and space. Marko PorčićUniversity of Belgradearticlearchaeological theoryarchaeological culturetypologyevolutionismAnthropologyGN1-890ENFRSREtnoantropološki Problemi, Vol 8, Iss 3 (2016)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FR SR
topic	archaeological theory archaeological culture typology evolutionism Anthropology GN1-890
spellingShingle	archaeological theory archaeological culture typology evolutionism Anthropology GN1-890 Marko Porčić An Exercise in Theoretical Archaeology: Do Archaeological Cultures Exist?
description	Archaeological culture still persists as a basic analytical and interpretative concept in Serbian archaeology despite criticism. This paper presents a formal view of archaeological cultures and explores the epistemological implications of this formalization. Formal analysis of archaeological culture is achieved through logical and quantitative explication of the traditional definition of archaeological cultures. The main result of the formal analysis is that there are real patterns of formal variability of material culture that may or may not correspond to traditional archaeological cultures. These patterns are real only in the analytical sense – they are real for given input data and scale of analysis. Unlike the traditional approach where this patterns are equated with archaeological cultures which are furthered interpreted in essentialist terms or as quasi- organic entities such as ethnic groups, it is claimed here that discovered patterns are only the starting point – the empirical situation that needs to be accounted for in anthropological an historical terms. This paper shows how patterns that are traditionally identified as archaeological cultures can arise as a consequence of an entire range of processes – different social and historical realities. The main conclusion is that the traditional concept of archaeological culture is not useful neither as analytical or interpretative tools for two reasons: 1) traditional cultures are subjectively defined entities with no theoretical justification for the criteria used in their definition and 2) the empirical pattern cannot be an explanation in itself because it is the thing that needs to be explained. Cultural evolutionary (transmission) theory is proposed as a general framework for defining and interpreting patterns of formal variability of material culture in time and space.
format	article
author	Marko Porčić
author_facet	Marko Porčić
author_sort	Marko Porčić
title	An Exercise in Theoretical Archaeology: Do Archaeological Cultures Exist?
title_short	An Exercise in Theoretical Archaeology: Do Archaeological Cultures Exist?
title_full	An Exercise in Theoretical Archaeology: Do Archaeological Cultures Exist?
title_fullStr	An Exercise in Theoretical Archaeology: Do Archaeological Cultures Exist?
title_full_unstemmed	An Exercise in Theoretical Archaeology: Do Archaeological Cultures Exist?
title_sort	exercise in theoretical archaeology: do archaeological cultures exist?
publisher	University of Belgrade
publishDate	2016
url	https://doaj.org/article/cbef340189684a40a4c7ac9c73ac187a
work_keys_str_mv	AT markoporcic anexerciseintheoreticalarchaeologydoarchaeologicalculturesexist AT markoporcic exerciseintheoreticalarchaeologydoarchaeologicalculturesexist
_version_	1718400076799279104

An Exercise in Theoretical Archaeology: Do Archaeological Cultures Exist?

Ejemplares similares