Similar cerebral motor plans for real and virtual actions.

A simple movement, such as pressing a button, can acquire different meanings by producing different consequences, such as starting an elevator or switching a TV channel. We evaluated whether the brain activity preceding a simple action is modulated by the expected consequences of the action itself....

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chiara Bozzacchi, Maria Assunta Giusti, Sabrina Pitzalis, Donatella Spinelli, Francesco Di Russo
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cc092936b5ca4ac4b31439ee45857465
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cc092936b5ca4ac4b31439ee45857465
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cc092936b5ca4ac4b31439ee458574652021-11-18T08:11:10ZSimilar cerebral motor plans for real and virtual actions.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0047783https://doaj.org/article/cc092936b5ca4ac4b31439ee458574652012-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23112847/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203A simple movement, such as pressing a button, can acquire different meanings by producing different consequences, such as starting an elevator or switching a TV channel. We evaluated whether the brain activity preceding a simple action is modulated by the expected consequences of the action itself. To further this aim, the motor-related cortical potentials were compared during two key-press actions that were identical from the kinematics point of view but different in both meaning and consequences. In one case (virtual grasp), the key-press started a video clip showing a hand moving toward a cup and grasping it; in the other case, the key-press did not produce any consequence (key-press). A third condition (real grasp) was also compared, in which subjects actually grasped the cup, producing the same action presented in the video clip. Data were collected from fifteen subjects. The results showed that motor preparation for virtual grasp (starting 3 s before the movement onset) was different from that of the key-press and similar to the real grasp preparation-as if subjects had to grasp the cup in person. In particular, both virtual and real grasp presented a posterior parietal negativity preceding activity in motor and pre-motor areas. In summary, this finding supports the hypothesis that motor preparation is affected by the meaning of the action, even when the action is only virtual.Chiara BozzacchiMaria Assunta GiustiSabrina PitzalisDonatella SpinelliFrancesco Di RussoPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 7, Iss 10, p e47783 (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Chiara Bozzacchi
Maria Assunta Giusti
Sabrina Pitzalis
Donatella Spinelli
Francesco Di Russo
Similar cerebral motor plans for real and virtual actions.
description A simple movement, such as pressing a button, can acquire different meanings by producing different consequences, such as starting an elevator or switching a TV channel. We evaluated whether the brain activity preceding a simple action is modulated by the expected consequences of the action itself. To further this aim, the motor-related cortical potentials were compared during two key-press actions that were identical from the kinematics point of view but different in both meaning and consequences. In one case (virtual grasp), the key-press started a video clip showing a hand moving toward a cup and grasping it; in the other case, the key-press did not produce any consequence (key-press). A third condition (real grasp) was also compared, in which subjects actually grasped the cup, producing the same action presented in the video clip. Data were collected from fifteen subjects. The results showed that motor preparation for virtual grasp (starting 3 s before the movement onset) was different from that of the key-press and similar to the real grasp preparation-as if subjects had to grasp the cup in person. In particular, both virtual and real grasp presented a posterior parietal negativity preceding activity in motor and pre-motor areas. In summary, this finding supports the hypothesis that motor preparation is affected by the meaning of the action, even when the action is only virtual.
format article
author Chiara Bozzacchi
Maria Assunta Giusti
Sabrina Pitzalis
Donatella Spinelli
Francesco Di Russo
author_facet Chiara Bozzacchi
Maria Assunta Giusti
Sabrina Pitzalis
Donatella Spinelli
Francesco Di Russo
author_sort Chiara Bozzacchi
title Similar cerebral motor plans for real and virtual actions.
title_short Similar cerebral motor plans for real and virtual actions.
title_full Similar cerebral motor plans for real and virtual actions.
title_fullStr Similar cerebral motor plans for real and virtual actions.
title_full_unstemmed Similar cerebral motor plans for real and virtual actions.
title_sort similar cerebral motor plans for real and virtual actions.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/cc092936b5ca4ac4b31439ee45857465
work_keys_str_mv AT chiarabozzacchi similarcerebralmotorplansforrealandvirtualactions
AT mariaassuntagiusti similarcerebralmotorplansforrealandvirtualactions
AT sabrinapitzalis similarcerebralmotorplansforrealandvirtualactions
AT donatellaspinelli similarcerebralmotorplansforrealandvirtualactions
AT francescodirusso similarcerebralmotorplansforrealandvirtualactions
_version_ 1718422135470292992