Adaptive memory: evaluating alternative forms of fitness-relevant processing in the survival processing paradigm.

Memory may have evolved to preserve information processed in terms of its fitness-relevance. Based on the assumption that the human mind comprises different fitness-relevant adaptive mechanisms contributing to survival and reproductive success, we compared alternative fitness-relevant processing sce...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joshua Sandry, David Trafimow, Michael J Marks, Stephen Rice
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cc4ad4d58a174b0c87fd4cef6709e432
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cc4ad4d58a174b0c87fd4cef6709e432
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cc4ad4d58a174b0c87fd4cef6709e4322021-11-18T07:50:05ZAdaptive memory: evaluating alternative forms of fitness-relevant processing in the survival processing paradigm.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0060868https://doaj.org/article/cc4ad4d58a174b0c87fd4cef6709e4322013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23585858/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Memory may have evolved to preserve information processed in terms of its fitness-relevance. Based on the assumption that the human mind comprises different fitness-relevant adaptive mechanisms contributing to survival and reproductive success, we compared alternative fitness-relevant processing scenarios with survival processing. Participants rated words for relevancy to fitness-relevant and control conditions followed by a delay and surprise recall test (Experiment 1a). Participants recalled more words processed for their relevance to a survival situation. We replicated these findings in an online study (Experiment 2) and a study using revised fitness-relevant scenarios (Experiment 3). Across all experiments, we did not find a mnemonic benefit for alternative fitness-relevant processing scenarios, questioning assumptions associated with an evolutionary account of remembering. Based on these results, fitness-relevance seems to be too wide-ranging of a construct to account for the memory findings associated with survival processing. We propose that memory may be hierarchically sensitive to fitness-relevant processing instructions. We encourage future researchers to investigate the underlying mechanisms responsible for survival processing effects and work toward developing a taxonomy of adaptive memory.Joshua SandryDavid TrafimowMichael J MarksStephen RicePublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 4, p e60868 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Joshua Sandry
David Trafimow
Michael J Marks
Stephen Rice
Adaptive memory: evaluating alternative forms of fitness-relevant processing in the survival processing paradigm.
description Memory may have evolved to preserve information processed in terms of its fitness-relevance. Based on the assumption that the human mind comprises different fitness-relevant adaptive mechanisms contributing to survival and reproductive success, we compared alternative fitness-relevant processing scenarios with survival processing. Participants rated words for relevancy to fitness-relevant and control conditions followed by a delay and surprise recall test (Experiment 1a). Participants recalled more words processed for their relevance to a survival situation. We replicated these findings in an online study (Experiment 2) and a study using revised fitness-relevant scenarios (Experiment 3). Across all experiments, we did not find a mnemonic benefit for alternative fitness-relevant processing scenarios, questioning assumptions associated with an evolutionary account of remembering. Based on these results, fitness-relevance seems to be too wide-ranging of a construct to account for the memory findings associated with survival processing. We propose that memory may be hierarchically sensitive to fitness-relevant processing instructions. We encourage future researchers to investigate the underlying mechanisms responsible for survival processing effects and work toward developing a taxonomy of adaptive memory.
format article
author Joshua Sandry
David Trafimow
Michael J Marks
Stephen Rice
author_facet Joshua Sandry
David Trafimow
Michael J Marks
Stephen Rice
author_sort Joshua Sandry
title Adaptive memory: evaluating alternative forms of fitness-relevant processing in the survival processing paradigm.
title_short Adaptive memory: evaluating alternative forms of fitness-relevant processing in the survival processing paradigm.
title_full Adaptive memory: evaluating alternative forms of fitness-relevant processing in the survival processing paradigm.
title_fullStr Adaptive memory: evaluating alternative forms of fitness-relevant processing in the survival processing paradigm.
title_full_unstemmed Adaptive memory: evaluating alternative forms of fitness-relevant processing in the survival processing paradigm.
title_sort adaptive memory: evaluating alternative forms of fitness-relevant processing in the survival processing paradigm.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/cc4ad4d58a174b0c87fd4cef6709e432
work_keys_str_mv AT joshuasandry adaptivememoryevaluatingalternativeformsoffitnessrelevantprocessinginthesurvivalprocessingparadigm
AT davidtrafimow adaptivememoryevaluatingalternativeformsoffitnessrelevantprocessinginthesurvivalprocessingparadigm
AT michaeljmarks adaptivememoryevaluatingalternativeformsoffitnessrelevantprocessinginthesurvivalprocessingparadigm
AT stephenrice adaptivememoryevaluatingalternativeformsoffitnessrelevantprocessinginthesurvivalprocessingparadigm
_version_ 1718422938123763712