Developing a Conversational Agent’s Capability to Identify Structural Wrongness in Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Model of Arguments
This article discusses the usefulness of Toulmin’s model of arguments as structuring an assessment of different types of wrongness in an argument. We discuss the usability of the model within a conversational agent that aims to support users to develop a good argument. Within the article, we present...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Behzad Mirzababaei, Viktoria Pammer-Schindler |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/cc6a553b2afb427f81b715aea8786f97 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
PERSPECTIVAS ARGUMENTALES EN DISPUTA EN TORNO A LA DISTRIBUCIÓN DE LA ‘PÍLDORA DEL DÍA DESPUÉS’
por: Wittig González,Fernando
Publicado: (2005) -
Analyzing Students’ Critical Thinking Pattern in Writing Argumentative Paragraph Based on Stephen Toulmin Theory
por: Ika Sastrawati, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Implicit Assessment and Argumentation
por: E. R. Ioanesyan
Publicado: (2020) -
The Dramatic Arc in the Development of Argumentation Skills of Upper Secondary School Students in Geography Education
por: Kimmo Härmä, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Argumentation in Whole-Class Teaching and Science Learning
por: Larrain,Antonia, et al.
Publicado: (2014)