Development of a Subjective Symptom Rating Scale for Postoperative Oral Dysfunction in Patients with Oral Cancer: Reliability and Validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale-10

Currently, there is no scale to subjectively assess postoperative oral dysfunction in patients with oral cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale (POD-10) that we developed. Between September 2019 and August 2021, 62 e...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuhei Matsuda, Isami Kumakura, Tatsuo Okui, Masaaki Karino, Noriaki Aoi, Satoe Okuma, Mayu Takeda, Kenji Hayashida, Tatsunori Sakamoto, Takahiro Kanno
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cc6f05f02a3e402a990bc86a8d32fa71
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cc6f05f02a3e402a990bc86a8d32fa71
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cc6f05f02a3e402a990bc86a8d32fa712021-11-25T17:21:16ZDevelopment of a Subjective Symptom Rating Scale for Postoperative Oral Dysfunction in Patients with Oral Cancer: Reliability and Validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale-1010.3390/diagnostics111120612075-4418https://doaj.org/article/cc6f05f02a3e402a990bc86a8d32fa712021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/11/11/2061https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4418Currently, there is no scale to subjectively assess postoperative oral dysfunction in patients with oral cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale (POD-10) that we developed. Between September 2019 and August 2021, 62 eligible oral cancer patients (median age, 72 years; 42 men and 20 women) were enrolled in the study. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, which indicates the internal consistency of the scale, was 0.94, and the intraclass correlation coefficient, which indicates reproducibility, was 0.85 (95% confidential interval: 0.40–0.96, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Concurrent validity testing showed a statistically significant correlation between POD-10 and Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) (r = 0.89, <i>p</i> < 0.05). To test discriminant validity, statistically significant differences were found between early-stage cancer (stage I and II) and advanced-stage cancer (stage III and IV) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Twenty-four points were calculated as the cutoff value for POD-10 using receiver operating characteristic analysis to calculate the cutoff value. The POD-10 was shown to be a clinically reliable and valid scale that can be used to subjectively assess postoperative oral dysfunction in patients with oral cancer and is expected to be used as a simple diagnostic tool.Yuhei MatsudaIsami KumakuraTatsuo OkuiMasaaki KarinoNoriaki AoiSatoe OkumaMayu TakedaKenji HayashidaTatsunori SakamotoTakahiro KannoMDPI AGarticlepostoperative oral dysfunction scale-10oral canceroral functionoral dysfunctiondysphagiareliabilityMedicine (General)R5-920ENDiagnostics, Vol 11, Iss 2061, p 2061 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic postoperative oral dysfunction scale-10
oral cancer
oral function
oral dysfunction
dysphagia
reliability
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle postoperative oral dysfunction scale-10
oral cancer
oral function
oral dysfunction
dysphagia
reliability
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Yuhei Matsuda
Isami Kumakura
Tatsuo Okui
Masaaki Karino
Noriaki Aoi
Satoe Okuma
Mayu Takeda
Kenji Hayashida
Tatsunori Sakamoto
Takahiro Kanno
Development of a Subjective Symptom Rating Scale for Postoperative Oral Dysfunction in Patients with Oral Cancer: Reliability and Validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale-10
description Currently, there is no scale to subjectively assess postoperative oral dysfunction in patients with oral cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale (POD-10) that we developed. Between September 2019 and August 2021, 62 eligible oral cancer patients (median age, 72 years; 42 men and 20 women) were enrolled in the study. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, which indicates the internal consistency of the scale, was 0.94, and the intraclass correlation coefficient, which indicates reproducibility, was 0.85 (95% confidential interval: 0.40–0.96, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Concurrent validity testing showed a statistically significant correlation between POD-10 and Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) (r = 0.89, <i>p</i> < 0.05). To test discriminant validity, statistically significant differences were found between early-stage cancer (stage I and II) and advanced-stage cancer (stage III and IV) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Twenty-four points were calculated as the cutoff value for POD-10 using receiver operating characteristic analysis to calculate the cutoff value. The POD-10 was shown to be a clinically reliable and valid scale that can be used to subjectively assess postoperative oral dysfunction in patients with oral cancer and is expected to be used as a simple diagnostic tool.
format article
author Yuhei Matsuda
Isami Kumakura
Tatsuo Okui
Masaaki Karino
Noriaki Aoi
Satoe Okuma
Mayu Takeda
Kenji Hayashida
Tatsunori Sakamoto
Takahiro Kanno
author_facet Yuhei Matsuda
Isami Kumakura
Tatsuo Okui
Masaaki Karino
Noriaki Aoi
Satoe Okuma
Mayu Takeda
Kenji Hayashida
Tatsunori Sakamoto
Takahiro Kanno
author_sort Yuhei Matsuda
title Development of a Subjective Symptom Rating Scale for Postoperative Oral Dysfunction in Patients with Oral Cancer: Reliability and Validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale-10
title_short Development of a Subjective Symptom Rating Scale for Postoperative Oral Dysfunction in Patients with Oral Cancer: Reliability and Validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale-10
title_full Development of a Subjective Symptom Rating Scale for Postoperative Oral Dysfunction in Patients with Oral Cancer: Reliability and Validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale-10
title_fullStr Development of a Subjective Symptom Rating Scale for Postoperative Oral Dysfunction in Patients with Oral Cancer: Reliability and Validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale-10
title_full_unstemmed Development of a Subjective Symptom Rating Scale for Postoperative Oral Dysfunction in Patients with Oral Cancer: Reliability and Validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale-10
title_sort development of a subjective symptom rating scale for postoperative oral dysfunction in patients with oral cancer: reliability and validity of the postoperative oral dysfunction scale-10
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/cc6f05f02a3e402a990bc86a8d32fa71
work_keys_str_mv AT yuheimatsuda developmentofasubjectivesymptomratingscaleforpostoperativeoraldysfunctioninpatientswithoralcancerreliabilityandvalidityofthepostoperativeoraldysfunctionscale10
AT isamikumakura developmentofasubjectivesymptomratingscaleforpostoperativeoraldysfunctioninpatientswithoralcancerreliabilityandvalidityofthepostoperativeoraldysfunctionscale10
AT tatsuookui developmentofasubjectivesymptomratingscaleforpostoperativeoraldysfunctioninpatientswithoralcancerreliabilityandvalidityofthepostoperativeoraldysfunctionscale10
AT masaakikarino developmentofasubjectivesymptomratingscaleforpostoperativeoraldysfunctioninpatientswithoralcancerreliabilityandvalidityofthepostoperativeoraldysfunctionscale10
AT noriakiaoi developmentofasubjectivesymptomratingscaleforpostoperativeoraldysfunctioninpatientswithoralcancerreliabilityandvalidityofthepostoperativeoraldysfunctionscale10
AT satoeokuma developmentofasubjectivesymptomratingscaleforpostoperativeoraldysfunctioninpatientswithoralcancerreliabilityandvalidityofthepostoperativeoraldysfunctionscale10
AT mayutakeda developmentofasubjectivesymptomratingscaleforpostoperativeoraldysfunctioninpatientswithoralcancerreliabilityandvalidityofthepostoperativeoraldysfunctionscale10
AT kenjihayashida developmentofasubjectivesymptomratingscaleforpostoperativeoraldysfunctioninpatientswithoralcancerreliabilityandvalidityofthepostoperativeoraldysfunctionscale10
AT tatsunorisakamoto developmentofasubjectivesymptomratingscaleforpostoperativeoraldysfunctioninpatientswithoralcancerreliabilityandvalidityofthepostoperativeoraldysfunctionscale10
AT takahirokanno developmentofasubjectivesymptomratingscaleforpostoperativeoraldysfunctioninpatientswithoralcancerreliabilityandvalidityofthepostoperativeoraldysfunctionscale10
_version_ 1718412496168026112