Commitment to the truth or defensive stance? Political strategies in the Brexit contest

This paper analyses politicians’ selection of adverbs of certainty and extreme case formulations (ECFs) in both the 1975 Referendum and the Brexit (2016). This analysis helped discover if politicians in the 1975 Referendum and the Brexit: (a) framed a similar or different reality through their disco...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Iñigo-Mora Isabel
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Sciendo 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cc7be01eab3444c09315c530a62c6b4c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cc7be01eab3444c09315c530a62c6b4c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cc7be01eab3444c09315c530a62c6b4c2021-12-05T14:11:09ZCommitment to the truth or defensive stance? Political strategies in the Brexit contest2083-850610.2478/plc-2021-0006https://doaj.org/article/cc7be01eab3444c09315c530a62c6b4c2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2021-0006https://doaj.org/toc/2083-8506This paper analyses politicians’ selection of adverbs of certainty and extreme case formulations (ECFs) in both the 1975 Referendum and the Brexit (2016). This analysis helped discover if politicians in the 1975 Referendum and the Brexit: (a) framed a similar or different reality through their discourse choices and (b) used the same types of adverbs of certainty and ECFs and with the same frequency. For this purpose, we contrasted both the time (the 1975 Referendum vs. the Brexit) and the position (Anti-Europe vs. Pro-Europe). The corpus was made up of eight different recordings. Four of them were about the Brexit and four about the 1975 Referendum. In the case of the Brexit corpus, two recordings were Pro-Europe, two were Anti-Europe, and the same was in the case of the 1975 Referendum corpus.Iñigo-Mora IsabelSciendoarticlepolitical discoursebrexitadverbs of certaintyextreme case formulations1975 referedumOral communication. SpeechP95-95.6PsychologyBF1-990ENPsychology of Language and Communication, Vol 25, Iss 1, Pp 120-144 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic political discourse
brexit
adverbs of certainty
extreme case formulations
1975 referedum
Oral communication. Speech
P95-95.6
Psychology
BF1-990
spellingShingle political discourse
brexit
adverbs of certainty
extreme case formulations
1975 referedum
Oral communication. Speech
P95-95.6
Psychology
BF1-990
Iñigo-Mora Isabel
Commitment to the truth or defensive stance? Political strategies in the Brexit contest
description This paper analyses politicians’ selection of adverbs of certainty and extreme case formulations (ECFs) in both the 1975 Referendum and the Brexit (2016). This analysis helped discover if politicians in the 1975 Referendum and the Brexit: (a) framed a similar or different reality through their discourse choices and (b) used the same types of adverbs of certainty and ECFs and with the same frequency. For this purpose, we contrasted both the time (the 1975 Referendum vs. the Brexit) and the position (Anti-Europe vs. Pro-Europe). The corpus was made up of eight different recordings. Four of them were about the Brexit and four about the 1975 Referendum. In the case of the Brexit corpus, two recordings were Pro-Europe, two were Anti-Europe, and the same was in the case of the 1975 Referendum corpus.
format article
author Iñigo-Mora Isabel
author_facet Iñigo-Mora Isabel
author_sort Iñigo-Mora Isabel
title Commitment to the truth or defensive stance? Political strategies in the Brexit contest
title_short Commitment to the truth or defensive stance? Political strategies in the Brexit contest
title_full Commitment to the truth or defensive stance? Political strategies in the Brexit contest
title_fullStr Commitment to the truth or defensive stance? Political strategies in the Brexit contest
title_full_unstemmed Commitment to the truth or defensive stance? Political strategies in the Brexit contest
title_sort commitment to the truth or defensive stance? political strategies in the brexit contest
publisher Sciendo
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/cc7be01eab3444c09315c530a62c6b4c
work_keys_str_mv AT inigomoraisabel commitmenttothetruthordefensivestancepoliticalstrategiesinthebrexitcontest
_version_ 1718371323997061120