Anthropocentric Ocean Connectivity: A Pluralistic Legal-Regulatory Model

This article proposes a model of anthropocentric ocean connectivity based on the concept of human perspective as location. Within this location, anthropocentrism can be, but is not necessarily, an exclusive or dominant valuation of the human. In fact, conceptions of both anthropocentrism and of ocea...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Julia Gaunce, Jan Solski, Iva Parlov, Maria Madalena das Neves
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN NO
Publicado:	Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP 2021
Materias:	ocean connectivity ocean governance anthropocentrism(s) human activity plurality Law K
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/cc8951cb35ac453184c00aa3ece14472
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:cc8951cb35ac453184c00aa3ece14472
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:cc8951cb35ac453184c00aa3ece144722021-11-23T12:57:51ZAnthropocentric Ocean Connectivity: A Pluralistic Legal-Regulatory Model2387-456210.23865/arctic.v12.3293https://doaj.org/article/cc8951cb35ac453184c00aa3ece144722021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/3293/5903https://doaj.org/toc/2387-4562This article proposes a model of anthropocentric ocean connectivity based on the concept of human perspective as location. Within this location, anthropocentrism can be, but is not necessarily, an exclusive or dominant valuation of the human. In fact, conceptions of both anthropocentrism and of ocean connectivity are pluralistic. These and other pluralisms are borne out in this article’s content and structure, which takes the form of explorations of anthropocentric connectivity in relation to four specific ocean-related human activities. First, Jan Solski applies understandings of connectivity as “flow” in the context of strategic ocean geopolitics. Second, Iva Parlov analyzes current doctrinal issues and interactions at the international level with respect to the legal regime for places of refuge for ships in need of assistance. Third, Maria Madalena das Neves examines ocean connectivity in the context of transboundary energy trade and market integration, with particular attention to geopolitical and ecological connectivity. Finally, Julia Gaunce proposes that the making and application of transnational rules and standards for ships in polar waters enhances certain connections and disrupts others, to the detriment of oceans and people, and that broadening connectivity especially in respect of Arctic Indigenous people(s) could help address challenges faced by oceans and ocean governance.Julia GaunceJan SolskiIva ParlovMaria Madalena das NevesCappelen Damm Akademisk NOASParticleocean connectivityocean governanceanthropocentrism(s)human activitypluralityLawKENNOArctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol 12, Iss 0, Pp 222-237 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN NO
topic	ocean connectivity ocean governance anthropocentrism(s) human activity plurality Law K
spellingShingle	ocean connectivity ocean governance anthropocentrism(s) human activity plurality Law K Julia Gaunce Jan Solski Iva Parlov Maria Madalena das Neves Anthropocentric Ocean Connectivity: A Pluralistic Legal-Regulatory Model
description	This article proposes a model of anthropocentric ocean connectivity based on the concept of human perspective as location. Within this location, anthropocentrism can be, but is not necessarily, an exclusive or dominant valuation of the human. In fact, conceptions of both anthropocentrism and of ocean connectivity are pluralistic. These and other pluralisms are borne out in this article’s content and structure, which takes the form of explorations of anthropocentric connectivity in relation to four specific ocean-related human activities. First, Jan Solski applies understandings of connectivity as “flow” in the context of strategic ocean geopolitics. Second, Iva Parlov analyzes current doctrinal issues and interactions at the international level with respect to the legal regime for places of refuge for ships in need of assistance. Third, Maria Madalena das Neves examines ocean connectivity in the context of transboundary energy trade and market integration, with particular attention to geopolitical and ecological connectivity. Finally, Julia Gaunce proposes that the making and application of transnational rules and standards for ships in polar waters enhances certain connections and disrupts others, to the detriment of oceans and people, and that broadening connectivity especially in respect of Arctic Indigenous people(s) could help address challenges faced by oceans and ocean governance.
format	article
author	Julia Gaunce Jan Solski Iva Parlov Maria Madalena das Neves
author_facet	Julia Gaunce Jan Solski Iva Parlov Maria Madalena das Neves
author_sort	Julia Gaunce
title	Anthropocentric Ocean Connectivity: A Pluralistic Legal-Regulatory Model
title_short	Anthropocentric Ocean Connectivity: A Pluralistic Legal-Regulatory Model
title_full	Anthropocentric Ocean Connectivity: A Pluralistic Legal-Regulatory Model
title_fullStr	Anthropocentric Ocean Connectivity: A Pluralistic Legal-Regulatory Model
title_full_unstemmed	Anthropocentric Ocean Connectivity: A Pluralistic Legal-Regulatory Model
title_sort	anthropocentric ocean connectivity: a pluralistic legal-regulatory model
publisher	Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/cc8951cb35ac453184c00aa3ece14472
work_keys_str_mv	AT juliagaunce anthropocentricoceanconnectivityapluralisticlegalregulatorymodel AT jansolski anthropocentricoceanconnectivityapluralisticlegalregulatorymodel AT ivaparlov anthropocentricoceanconnectivityapluralisticlegalregulatorymodel AT mariamadalenadasneves anthropocentricoceanconnectivityapluralisticlegalregulatorymodel
_version_	1718416729703448576

Anthropocentric Ocean Connectivity: A Pluralistic Legal-Regulatory Model

Ejemplares similares