Using the Tools of Informal Science Education to Connect Science and the Public
Traditional modes of communication within the scientific community, including presentation of data at conferences and in peer-reviewed publications, use technical jargon that limits public engagement. While altering word choice is an important method for increasing public engagement, the data itself...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/cc99b40d09e44b9d8de653f52cf21810 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:cc99b40d09e44b9d8de653f52cf21810 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:cc99b40d09e44b9d8de653f52cf218102021-11-15T15:04:53ZUsing the Tools of Informal Science Education to Connect Science and the Public10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.14271935-78851935-7877https://doaj.org/article/cc99b40d09e44b9d8de653f52cf218102018-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1427https://doaj.org/toc/1935-7877https://doaj.org/toc/1935-7885Traditional modes of communication within the scientific community, including presentation of data at conferences and in peer-reviewed publications, use technical jargon that limits public engagement. While altering word choice is an important method for increasing public engagement, the data itself may not be enough. For example, communicating the lack of evidence that vaccines cause autism did not convince many reluctant parents to vaccinate their kids (Nyhan, Reifler, Richey, Freed, Pediatrics 133:e835–e842, 2014). To address this gap between the scientific community and the public, many journals are adopting open-access policies and publishing lay-abstracts. Meanwhile, “meet a scientist” programs are creating opportunities for scientists to engage with the public in person. However, these programs may not be as effective as they could be. Many scientists still subscribe to an information-deficit model in which “the data speaks for itself.” Alternative tools that go beyond the data are needed. Here, I present three tools to create connections between the public and science: 3-D objects, games, and storytelling. These multidimensional and multisensory methods do more than promote understanding of scientific data; they may also be used to convey science as a verb and as an essential viewpoint in the human struggle for understanding.April KillikellyAmerican Society for MicrobiologyarticleSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691Biology (General)QH301-705.5ENJournal of Microbiology & Biology Education, Vol 19, Iss 1 (2018) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 |
spellingShingle |
Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 April Killikelly Using the Tools of Informal Science Education to Connect Science and the Public |
description |
Traditional modes of communication within the scientific community, including presentation of data at conferences and in peer-reviewed publications, use technical jargon that limits public engagement. While altering word choice is an important method for increasing public engagement, the data itself may not be enough. For example, communicating the lack of evidence that vaccines cause autism did not convince many reluctant parents to vaccinate their kids (Nyhan, Reifler, Richey, Freed, Pediatrics 133:e835–e842, 2014). To address this gap between the scientific community and the public, many journals are adopting open-access policies and publishing lay-abstracts. Meanwhile, “meet a scientist” programs are creating opportunities for scientists to engage with the public in person. However, these programs may not be as effective as they could be. Many scientists still subscribe to an information-deficit model in which “the data speaks for itself.” Alternative tools that go beyond the data are needed. Here, I present three tools to create connections between the public and science: 3-D objects, games, and storytelling. These multidimensional and multisensory methods do more than promote understanding of scientific data; they may also be used to convey science as a verb and as an essential viewpoint in the human struggle for understanding. |
format |
article |
author |
April Killikelly |
author_facet |
April Killikelly |
author_sort |
April Killikelly |
title |
Using the Tools of Informal Science Education to Connect Science and the Public |
title_short |
Using the Tools of Informal Science Education to Connect Science and the Public |
title_full |
Using the Tools of Informal Science Education to Connect Science and the Public |
title_fullStr |
Using the Tools of Informal Science Education to Connect Science and the Public |
title_full_unstemmed |
Using the Tools of Informal Science Education to Connect Science and the Public |
title_sort |
using the tools of informal science education to connect science and the public |
publisher |
American Society for Microbiology |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/cc99b40d09e44b9d8de653f52cf21810 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT aprilkillikelly usingthetoolsofinformalscienceeducationtoconnectscienceandthepublic |
_version_ |
1718428219553611776 |