Errata in East Coast tick study: retort to Tufts & Diuk-Wasser

Abstract The authors overlook the first report of Haemaphysalis punctata in the Western Hemisphere documented by a pioneer acarologist in 1910. The authors assume that climate change alters movement of ticks, but provide no data. The authors’ assumptions are only opinions, and must be corrected and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	John D. Scott
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	BMC 2021
Materias:	Ticks Haemaphysalis punctata Climate change Infectious and parasitic diseases RC109-216
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/ccac72b220584bdb9768eb5be22eaf37
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:ccac72b220584bdb9768eb5be22eaf37
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:ccac72b220584bdb9768eb5be22eaf372021-11-28T12:22:55ZErrata in East Coast tick study: retort to Tufts & Diuk-Wasser10.1186/s13071-021-05096-41756-3305https://doaj.org/article/ccac72b220584bdb9768eb5be22eaf372021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-05096-4https://doaj.org/toc/1756-3305Abstract The authors overlook the first report of Haemaphysalis punctata in the Western Hemisphere documented by a pioneer acarologist in 1910. The authors assume that climate change alters movement of ticks, but provide no data. The authors’ assumptions are only opinions, and must be corrected and challenged.John D. ScottBMCarticleTicksHaemaphysalis punctataClimate changeInfectious and parasitic diseasesRC109-216ENParasites & Vectors, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 1-2 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Ticks Haemaphysalis punctata Climate change Infectious and parasitic diseases RC109-216
spellingShingle	Ticks Haemaphysalis punctata Climate change Infectious and parasitic diseases RC109-216 John D. Scott Errata in East Coast tick study: retort to Tufts & Diuk-Wasser
description	Abstract The authors overlook the first report of Haemaphysalis punctata in the Western Hemisphere documented by a pioneer acarologist in 1910. The authors assume that climate change alters movement of ticks, but provide no data. The authors’ assumptions are only opinions, and must be corrected and challenged.
format	article
author	John D. Scott
author_facet	John D. Scott
author_sort	John D. Scott
title	Errata in East Coast tick study: retort to Tufts & Diuk-Wasser
title_short	Errata in East Coast tick study: retort to Tufts & Diuk-Wasser
title_full	Errata in East Coast tick study: retort to Tufts & Diuk-Wasser
title_fullStr	Errata in East Coast tick study: retort to Tufts & Diuk-Wasser
title_full_unstemmed	Errata in East Coast tick study: retort to Tufts & Diuk-Wasser
title_sort	errata in east coast tick study: retort to tufts & diuk-wasser
publisher	BMC
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/ccac72b220584bdb9768eb5be22eaf37
work_keys_str_mv	AT johndscott errataineastcoasttickstudyretorttotuftsdiukwasser
_version_	1718408043232755712

Errata in East Coast tick study: retort to Tufts & Diuk-Wasser

Ejemplares similares