Is Response to Genotoxic Stress Similar in Populations of African and European Ancestry? A Study of Dose-Response After in vitro Irradiation

Background: Exposure to genotoxic stress such as radiation is an important public health issue affecting a large population. The necessity of analyzing cytogenetic effects of such exposure is related to the need to estimate the associated risk. Cytogenetic biological dosimetry is based on the relati...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mamadou Soumboundou, Julien Dossou, Yossef Kalaga, Innocent Nkengurutse, Ibrahima Faye, Albert Guingani, Macoura Gadji, Koudbi J. Yameogo, Henri Zongo, Gora Mbaye, Ahmadou Dem, Mounibé Diarra, Rached Adjibade, Catherine Djebou, Steffen Junker, Noufissa Oudrhiri, William M. Hempel, Alain Dieterlen, Eric Jeandidier, Patrice Carde, Elie El Maalouf, Bruno Colicchio, Annelise Bennaceur-Griscelli, Michael Fenech, Philippe Voisin, Claire Rodriguez-Lafrasse, Radhia M’Kacher
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cd20f47c95294feaaaf0222946c326ec
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cd20f47c95294feaaaf0222946c326ec
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cd20f47c95294feaaaf0222946c326ec2021-11-11T15:13:51ZIs Response to Genotoxic Stress Similar in Populations of African and European Ancestry? A Study of Dose-Response After in vitro Irradiation1664-802110.3389/fgene.2021.657999https://doaj.org/article/cd20f47c95294feaaaf0222946c326ec2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2021.657999/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/1664-8021Background: Exposure to genotoxic stress such as radiation is an important public health issue affecting a large population. The necessity of analyzing cytogenetic effects of such exposure is related to the need to estimate the associated risk. Cytogenetic biological dosimetry is based on the relationship between the absorbed dose and the frequency of scored chromosomal aberrations. The influence of confounding factors on radiation response is a topical issue. The role of ethnicity is unclear. Here, we compared the dose-response curves obtained after irradiation of circulating lymphocytes from healthy donors of African and European ancestry.Materials and Methods: Blood samples from six Africans living in Africa, five Africans living in Europe, and five Caucasians living in Europe were exposed to various doses (0–4 Gy) of X-rays at a dose-rate of 0.1 Gy/min using an X-RAD320 irradiator. A validated cohort composed of 14 healthy Africans living in three African countries was included and blood samples were irradiated using the same protocols. Blood lymphocytes were cultured for 48 h and chromosomal aberrations scored during the first mitosis by telomere and centromere staining. The distribution of dicentric chromosomes was determined and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the dose-response curves of the two populations.Results: No spontaneous dicentric chromosomes were detected in African donors, thus establishing a very low background of unstable chromosomal aberrations relative to the European population. There was a significant difference in the dose response curves between native African and European donors. At 4 Gy, African donors showed a significantly lower frequency of dicentric chromosomes (p = 8.65 10–17), centric rings (p = 4.0310–14), and resulting double-strand-breaks (DSB) (p = 1.32 10–18) than European donors. In addition, a significant difference was found between African donors living in Europe and Africans living in Africa.Conclusion: This is the first study to demonstrate the important role of ethnic and environmental factors that may epigenetically influence the response to irradiation. It will be necessary to establish country-of-origen-specific dose response curves to practice precise and adequate biological dosimetry. This work opens new perspective for the comparison of treatments based on genotoxic agents, such as irradiation.Mamadou SoumboundouJulien DossouYossef KalagaInnocent NkengurutseIbrahima FayeAlbert GuinganiMacoura GadjiKoudbi J. YameogoHenri ZongoGora MbayeAhmadou DemMounibé DiarraRached AdjibadeCatherine DjebouSteffen JunkerNoufissa OudrhiriWilliam M. HempelAlain DieterlenEric JeandidierPatrice CardeElie El MaaloufBruno ColicchioAnnelise Bennaceur-GriscelliMichael FenechMichael FenechMichael FenechPhilippe VoisinClaire Rodriguez-LafrasseRadhia M’KacherFrontiers Media S.A.articleAfrican donorsEuropean donorsirradiationdicentric chromosometelomerescentromeresGeneticsQH426-470ENFrontiers in Genetics, Vol 12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic African donors
European donors
irradiation
dicentric chromosome
telomeres
centromeres
Genetics
QH426-470
spellingShingle African donors
European donors
irradiation
dicentric chromosome
telomeres
centromeres
Genetics
QH426-470
Mamadou Soumboundou
Julien Dossou
Yossef Kalaga
Innocent Nkengurutse
Ibrahima Faye
Albert Guingani
Macoura Gadji
Koudbi J. Yameogo
Henri Zongo
Gora Mbaye
Ahmadou Dem
Mounibé Diarra
Rached Adjibade
Catherine Djebou
Steffen Junker
Noufissa Oudrhiri
William M. Hempel
Alain Dieterlen
Eric Jeandidier
Patrice Carde
Elie El Maalouf
Bruno Colicchio
Annelise Bennaceur-Griscelli
Michael Fenech
Michael Fenech
Michael Fenech
Philippe Voisin
Claire Rodriguez-Lafrasse
Radhia M’Kacher
Is Response to Genotoxic Stress Similar in Populations of African and European Ancestry? A Study of Dose-Response After in vitro Irradiation
description Background: Exposure to genotoxic stress such as radiation is an important public health issue affecting a large population. The necessity of analyzing cytogenetic effects of such exposure is related to the need to estimate the associated risk. Cytogenetic biological dosimetry is based on the relationship between the absorbed dose and the frequency of scored chromosomal aberrations. The influence of confounding factors on radiation response is a topical issue. The role of ethnicity is unclear. Here, we compared the dose-response curves obtained after irradiation of circulating lymphocytes from healthy donors of African and European ancestry.Materials and Methods: Blood samples from six Africans living in Africa, five Africans living in Europe, and five Caucasians living in Europe were exposed to various doses (0–4 Gy) of X-rays at a dose-rate of 0.1 Gy/min using an X-RAD320 irradiator. A validated cohort composed of 14 healthy Africans living in three African countries was included and blood samples were irradiated using the same protocols. Blood lymphocytes were cultured for 48 h and chromosomal aberrations scored during the first mitosis by telomere and centromere staining. The distribution of dicentric chromosomes was determined and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the dose-response curves of the two populations.Results: No spontaneous dicentric chromosomes were detected in African donors, thus establishing a very low background of unstable chromosomal aberrations relative to the European population. There was a significant difference in the dose response curves between native African and European donors. At 4 Gy, African donors showed a significantly lower frequency of dicentric chromosomes (p = 8.65 10–17), centric rings (p = 4.0310–14), and resulting double-strand-breaks (DSB) (p = 1.32 10–18) than European donors. In addition, a significant difference was found between African donors living in Europe and Africans living in Africa.Conclusion: This is the first study to demonstrate the important role of ethnic and environmental factors that may epigenetically influence the response to irradiation. It will be necessary to establish country-of-origen-specific dose response curves to practice precise and adequate biological dosimetry. This work opens new perspective for the comparison of treatments based on genotoxic agents, such as irradiation.
format article
author Mamadou Soumboundou
Julien Dossou
Yossef Kalaga
Innocent Nkengurutse
Ibrahima Faye
Albert Guingani
Macoura Gadji
Koudbi J. Yameogo
Henri Zongo
Gora Mbaye
Ahmadou Dem
Mounibé Diarra
Rached Adjibade
Catherine Djebou
Steffen Junker
Noufissa Oudrhiri
William M. Hempel
Alain Dieterlen
Eric Jeandidier
Patrice Carde
Elie El Maalouf
Bruno Colicchio
Annelise Bennaceur-Griscelli
Michael Fenech
Michael Fenech
Michael Fenech
Philippe Voisin
Claire Rodriguez-Lafrasse
Radhia M’Kacher
author_facet Mamadou Soumboundou
Julien Dossou
Yossef Kalaga
Innocent Nkengurutse
Ibrahima Faye
Albert Guingani
Macoura Gadji
Koudbi J. Yameogo
Henri Zongo
Gora Mbaye
Ahmadou Dem
Mounibé Diarra
Rached Adjibade
Catherine Djebou
Steffen Junker
Noufissa Oudrhiri
William M. Hempel
Alain Dieterlen
Eric Jeandidier
Patrice Carde
Elie El Maalouf
Bruno Colicchio
Annelise Bennaceur-Griscelli
Michael Fenech
Michael Fenech
Michael Fenech
Philippe Voisin
Claire Rodriguez-Lafrasse
Radhia M’Kacher
author_sort Mamadou Soumboundou
title Is Response to Genotoxic Stress Similar in Populations of African and European Ancestry? A Study of Dose-Response After in vitro Irradiation
title_short Is Response to Genotoxic Stress Similar in Populations of African and European Ancestry? A Study of Dose-Response After in vitro Irradiation
title_full Is Response to Genotoxic Stress Similar in Populations of African and European Ancestry? A Study of Dose-Response After in vitro Irradiation
title_fullStr Is Response to Genotoxic Stress Similar in Populations of African and European Ancestry? A Study of Dose-Response After in vitro Irradiation
title_full_unstemmed Is Response to Genotoxic Stress Similar in Populations of African and European Ancestry? A Study of Dose-Response After in vitro Irradiation
title_sort is response to genotoxic stress similar in populations of african and european ancestry? a study of dose-response after in vitro irradiation
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/cd20f47c95294feaaaf0222946c326ec
work_keys_str_mv AT mamadousoumboundou isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT juliendossou isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT yossefkalaga isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT innocentnkengurutse isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT ibrahimafaye isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT albertguingani isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT macouragadji isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT koudbijyameogo isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT henrizongo isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT gorambaye isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT ahmadoudem isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT mounibediarra isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT rachedadjibade isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT catherinedjebou isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT steffenjunker isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT noufissaoudrhiri isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT williammhempel isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT alaindieterlen isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT ericjeandidier isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT patricecarde isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT elieelmaalouf isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT brunocolicchio isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT annelisebennaceurgriscelli isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT michaelfenech isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT michaelfenech isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT michaelfenech isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT philippevoisin isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT clairerodriguezlafrasse isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
AT radhiamkacher isresponsetogenotoxicstresssimilarinpopulationsofafricanandeuropeanancestryastudyofdoseresponseafterinvitroirradiation
_version_ 1718436419265888256