Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation
Abstract Competition between simultaneously presented visual stimuli lengthens reaction time and reduces both the BOLD response and neural firing. In contrast, conditions of sequential presentation have been assumed to be free from competition. Here we manipulated the spatial proximity of stimuli (N...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/cd38faca51e0483fa876e7678e994784 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:cd38faca51e0483fa876e7678e994784 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:cd38faca51e0483fa876e7678e9947842021-12-02T16:08:00ZCompetitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation10.1038/s41598-017-05011-x2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/cd38faca51e0483fa876e7678e9947842017-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05011-xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Competition between simultaneously presented visual stimuli lengthens reaction time and reduces both the BOLD response and neural firing. In contrast, conditions of sequential presentation have been assumed to be free from competition. Here we manipulated the spatial proximity of stimuli (Near versus Far conditions) to examine the effects of simultaneous and sequential competition on different measures of working memory (WM) for colour. With simultaneous presentation, the measure of WM precision was significantly lower for Near items, and participants reported the colour of the wrong item more often. These effects were preserved when the second stimulus immediately followed the first, disappeared when they were separated by 500 ms, and were partly recovered (evident for our measure of mis-binding but not WM precision) when the task was altered to encourage participants to maintain the sequentially presented items together in WM. Our results show, for the first time, that competition affects the measure of WM precision, and challenge the assumption that sequential presentation removes competition.Jumana AhmadGarrett SwanHoward BowmanBrad WybleAnna C. NobreKimron L. ShapiroFiona McNabNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-16 (2017) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Jumana Ahmad Garrett Swan Howard Bowman Brad Wyble Anna C. Nobre Kimron L. Shapiro Fiona McNab Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation |
description |
Abstract Competition between simultaneously presented visual stimuli lengthens reaction time and reduces both the BOLD response and neural firing. In contrast, conditions of sequential presentation have been assumed to be free from competition. Here we manipulated the spatial proximity of stimuli (Near versus Far conditions) to examine the effects of simultaneous and sequential competition on different measures of working memory (WM) for colour. With simultaneous presentation, the measure of WM precision was significantly lower for Near items, and participants reported the colour of the wrong item more often. These effects were preserved when the second stimulus immediately followed the first, disappeared when they were separated by 500 ms, and were partly recovered (evident for our measure of mis-binding but not WM precision) when the task was altered to encourage participants to maintain the sequentially presented items together in WM. Our results show, for the first time, that competition affects the measure of WM precision, and challenge the assumption that sequential presentation removes competition. |
format |
article |
author |
Jumana Ahmad Garrett Swan Howard Bowman Brad Wyble Anna C. Nobre Kimron L. Shapiro Fiona McNab |
author_facet |
Jumana Ahmad Garrett Swan Howard Bowman Brad Wyble Anna C. Nobre Kimron L. Shapiro Fiona McNab |
author_sort |
Jumana Ahmad |
title |
Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation |
title_short |
Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation |
title_full |
Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation |
title_fullStr |
Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation |
title_sort |
competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/cd38faca51e0483fa876e7678e994784 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jumanaahmad competitiveinteractionsaffectworkingmemoryperformanceforbothsimultaneousandsequentialstimuluspresentation AT garrettswan competitiveinteractionsaffectworkingmemoryperformanceforbothsimultaneousandsequentialstimuluspresentation AT howardbowman competitiveinteractionsaffectworkingmemoryperformanceforbothsimultaneousandsequentialstimuluspresentation AT bradwyble competitiveinteractionsaffectworkingmemoryperformanceforbothsimultaneousandsequentialstimuluspresentation AT annacnobre competitiveinteractionsaffectworkingmemoryperformanceforbothsimultaneousandsequentialstimuluspresentation AT kimronlshapiro competitiveinteractionsaffectworkingmemoryperformanceforbothsimultaneousandsequentialstimuluspresentation AT fionamcnab competitiveinteractionsaffectworkingmemoryperformanceforbothsimultaneousandsequentialstimuluspresentation |
_version_ |
1718384685009076224 |