Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation

Abstract Competition between simultaneously presented visual stimuli lengthens reaction time and reduces both the BOLD response and neural firing. In contrast, conditions of sequential presentation have been assumed to be free from competition. Here we manipulated the spatial proximity of stimuli (N...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jumana Ahmad, Garrett Swan, Howard Bowman, Brad Wyble, Anna C. Nobre, Kimron L. Shapiro, Fiona McNab
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cd38faca51e0483fa876e7678e994784
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cd38faca51e0483fa876e7678e994784
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cd38faca51e0483fa876e7678e9947842021-12-02T16:08:00ZCompetitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation10.1038/s41598-017-05011-x2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/cd38faca51e0483fa876e7678e9947842017-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05011-xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Competition between simultaneously presented visual stimuli lengthens reaction time and reduces both the BOLD response and neural firing. In contrast, conditions of sequential presentation have been assumed to be free from competition. Here we manipulated the spatial proximity of stimuli (Near versus Far conditions) to examine the effects of simultaneous and sequential competition on different measures of working memory (WM) for colour. With simultaneous presentation, the measure of WM precision was significantly lower for Near items, and participants reported the colour of the wrong item more often. These effects were preserved when the second stimulus immediately followed the first, disappeared when they were separated by 500 ms, and were partly recovered (evident for our measure of mis-binding but not WM precision) when the task was altered to encourage participants to maintain the sequentially presented items together in WM. Our results show, for the first time, that competition affects the measure of WM precision, and challenge the assumption that sequential presentation removes competition.Jumana AhmadGarrett SwanHoward BowmanBrad WybleAnna C. NobreKimron L. ShapiroFiona McNabNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-16 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Jumana Ahmad
Garrett Swan
Howard Bowman
Brad Wyble
Anna C. Nobre
Kimron L. Shapiro
Fiona McNab
Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation
description Abstract Competition between simultaneously presented visual stimuli lengthens reaction time and reduces both the BOLD response and neural firing. In contrast, conditions of sequential presentation have been assumed to be free from competition. Here we manipulated the spatial proximity of stimuli (Near versus Far conditions) to examine the effects of simultaneous and sequential competition on different measures of working memory (WM) for colour. With simultaneous presentation, the measure of WM precision was significantly lower for Near items, and participants reported the colour of the wrong item more often. These effects were preserved when the second stimulus immediately followed the first, disappeared when they were separated by 500 ms, and were partly recovered (evident for our measure of mis-binding but not WM precision) when the task was altered to encourage participants to maintain the sequentially presented items together in WM. Our results show, for the first time, that competition affects the measure of WM precision, and challenge the assumption that sequential presentation removes competition.
format article
author Jumana Ahmad
Garrett Swan
Howard Bowman
Brad Wyble
Anna C. Nobre
Kimron L. Shapiro
Fiona McNab
author_facet Jumana Ahmad
Garrett Swan
Howard Bowman
Brad Wyble
Anna C. Nobre
Kimron L. Shapiro
Fiona McNab
author_sort Jumana Ahmad
title Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation
title_short Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation
title_full Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation
title_fullStr Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation
title_full_unstemmed Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation
title_sort competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/cd38faca51e0483fa876e7678e994784
work_keys_str_mv AT jumanaahmad competitiveinteractionsaffectworkingmemoryperformanceforbothsimultaneousandsequentialstimuluspresentation
AT garrettswan competitiveinteractionsaffectworkingmemoryperformanceforbothsimultaneousandsequentialstimuluspresentation
AT howardbowman competitiveinteractionsaffectworkingmemoryperformanceforbothsimultaneousandsequentialstimuluspresentation
AT bradwyble competitiveinteractionsaffectworkingmemoryperformanceforbothsimultaneousandsequentialstimuluspresentation
AT annacnobre competitiveinteractionsaffectworkingmemoryperformanceforbothsimultaneousandsequentialstimuluspresentation
AT kimronlshapiro competitiveinteractionsaffectworkingmemoryperformanceforbothsimultaneousandsequentialstimuluspresentation
AT fionamcnab competitiveinteractionsaffectworkingmemoryperformanceforbothsimultaneousandsequentialstimuluspresentation
_version_ 1718384685009076224