What treatment and services are effective for people who are homeless and use drugs? A systematic 'review of reviews'.

<h4>Background</h4>People who experience homelessness and those vulnerably housed experience disproportionately high rates of drug use and associated harms, yet barriers to services and support are common. We undertook a systematic 'review of reviews' to investigate the effects...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joanna Astrid Miler, Hannah Carver, Wendy Masterton, Tessa Parkes, Michelle Maden, Lisa Jones, Harry Sumnall
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cd3963875eab444c9874c5a1e450e471
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cd3963875eab444c9874c5a1e450e471
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cd3963875eab444c9874c5a1e450e4712021-12-02T20:07:00ZWhat treatment and services are effective for people who are homeless and use drugs? A systematic 'review of reviews'.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0254729https://doaj.org/article/cd3963875eab444c9874c5a1e450e4712021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254729https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>People who experience homelessness and those vulnerably housed experience disproportionately high rates of drug use and associated harms, yet barriers to services and support are common. We undertook a systematic 'review of reviews' to investigate the effects of interventions for this population on substance use, housing, and related outcomes, as well as on treatment engagement, retention and successful completion.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>We searched ten electronic databases from inception to October 2020 for reviews and syntheses, conducted a grey literature search, and hand searched reference lists of included studies. We selected reviews that synthesised evidence on any type of treatment or intervention that reported substance use outcomes for people who reported being homeless. We appraised the quality of included reviews using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses and the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles. Our search identified 843 citations, and 25 reviews met the inclusion criteria. Regarding substance use outcomes, there was evidence that harm reduction approaches lead to decreases in drug-related risk behaviour and fatal overdoses, and reduce mortality, morbidity, and substance use. Case management interventions were significantly better than treatment as usual in reducing substance use among people who are homeless. The evidence indicates that Housing First does not lead to significant changes in substance use. Evidence regarding housing and other outcomes is mixed.<h4>Conclusions</h4>People who are homeless and use drugs experience many barriers to accessing healthcare and treatment. Evidence regarding interventions designed specifically for this population is limited, but harm reduction and case management approaches can lead to improvements in substance use outcomes, whilst some housing interventions improve housing outcomes and may provide more stability. More research is needed regarding optimal treatment length as well as qualitative insights from people experiencing or at risk of homelessness.Joanna Astrid MilerHannah CarverWendy MastertonTessa ParkesMichelle MadenLisa JonesHarry SumnallPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 7, p e0254729 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Joanna Astrid Miler
Hannah Carver
Wendy Masterton
Tessa Parkes
Michelle Maden
Lisa Jones
Harry Sumnall
What treatment and services are effective for people who are homeless and use drugs? A systematic 'review of reviews'.
description <h4>Background</h4>People who experience homelessness and those vulnerably housed experience disproportionately high rates of drug use and associated harms, yet barriers to services and support are common. We undertook a systematic 'review of reviews' to investigate the effects of interventions for this population on substance use, housing, and related outcomes, as well as on treatment engagement, retention and successful completion.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>We searched ten electronic databases from inception to October 2020 for reviews and syntheses, conducted a grey literature search, and hand searched reference lists of included studies. We selected reviews that synthesised evidence on any type of treatment or intervention that reported substance use outcomes for people who reported being homeless. We appraised the quality of included reviews using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses and the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles. Our search identified 843 citations, and 25 reviews met the inclusion criteria. Regarding substance use outcomes, there was evidence that harm reduction approaches lead to decreases in drug-related risk behaviour and fatal overdoses, and reduce mortality, morbidity, and substance use. Case management interventions were significantly better than treatment as usual in reducing substance use among people who are homeless. The evidence indicates that Housing First does not lead to significant changes in substance use. Evidence regarding housing and other outcomes is mixed.<h4>Conclusions</h4>People who are homeless and use drugs experience many barriers to accessing healthcare and treatment. Evidence regarding interventions designed specifically for this population is limited, but harm reduction and case management approaches can lead to improvements in substance use outcomes, whilst some housing interventions improve housing outcomes and may provide more stability. More research is needed regarding optimal treatment length as well as qualitative insights from people experiencing or at risk of homelessness.
format article
author Joanna Astrid Miler
Hannah Carver
Wendy Masterton
Tessa Parkes
Michelle Maden
Lisa Jones
Harry Sumnall
author_facet Joanna Astrid Miler
Hannah Carver
Wendy Masterton
Tessa Parkes
Michelle Maden
Lisa Jones
Harry Sumnall
author_sort Joanna Astrid Miler
title What treatment and services are effective for people who are homeless and use drugs? A systematic 'review of reviews'.
title_short What treatment and services are effective for people who are homeless and use drugs? A systematic 'review of reviews'.
title_full What treatment and services are effective for people who are homeless and use drugs? A systematic 'review of reviews'.
title_fullStr What treatment and services are effective for people who are homeless and use drugs? A systematic 'review of reviews'.
title_full_unstemmed What treatment and services are effective for people who are homeless and use drugs? A systematic 'review of reviews'.
title_sort what treatment and services are effective for people who are homeless and use drugs? a systematic 'review of reviews'.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/cd3963875eab444c9874c5a1e450e471
work_keys_str_mv AT joannaastridmiler whattreatmentandservicesareeffectiveforpeoplewhoarehomelessandusedrugsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT hannahcarver whattreatmentandservicesareeffectiveforpeoplewhoarehomelessandusedrugsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT wendymasterton whattreatmentandservicesareeffectiveforpeoplewhoarehomelessandusedrugsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT tessaparkes whattreatmentandservicesareeffectiveforpeoplewhoarehomelessandusedrugsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT michellemaden whattreatmentandservicesareeffectiveforpeoplewhoarehomelessandusedrugsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT lisajones whattreatmentandservicesareeffectiveforpeoplewhoarehomelessandusedrugsasystematicreviewofreviews
AT harrysumnall whattreatmentandservicesareeffectiveforpeoplewhoarehomelessandusedrugsasystematicreviewofreviews
_version_ 1718375329500758016