Conservation and sustainable development in a VUCA world: the need for a systemic and ecosystem‐based approach

Targeting the maintenance of functional ecosystems that provide the significant basis for human well‐being is an integral part of an ecosystem‐based sustainable development. Underlying causes of ecosystem degradation such as global climate change and ever‐growing human demands that rapidly shift soc...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Axel Schick, Peter R. Hobson, Pierre L. Ibisch
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cd9d2b21dbb84c19b19f771a0753370c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cd9d2b21dbb84c19b19f771a0753370c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cd9d2b21dbb84c19b19f771a0753370c2021-12-02T13:42:21ZConservation and sustainable development in a VUCA world: the need for a systemic and ecosystem‐based approach2096-41292332-887810.1002/ehs2.1267https://doaj.org/article/cd9d2b21dbb84c19b19f771a0753370c2017-04-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehs2.1267https://doaj.org/toc/2096-4129https://doaj.org/toc/2332-8878Targeting the maintenance of functional ecosystems that provide the significant basis for human well‐being is an integral part of an ecosystem‐based sustainable development. Underlying causes of ecosystem degradation such as global climate change and ever‐growing human demands that rapidly shift socioeconomic and political baselines are often unmanageable at a local scale and require a new approach to planning and action in ecosystem management. The framework conditions that challenge sustainable development are shaped by increasing Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, and Ambiguity (VUCA concept). Using the MARISCO method (adaptive management of vulnerability and risks at conservation sites), we analyzed 22 conservation sites, covering 26 protected areas and six administrative areas on four different continents and involving 524 participants. VUCA conditions were present across cultures and biomes, yet the responses in planning and management varied among conservation sites. The findings of both the qualitative and quantitative analyses confirm that participants understand how far human well‐being heavily depends on the functionality of ecosystems that were seen to suffer from a wide range of stresses and threats of varying criticality. Worldwide, local stakeholders and experts rated impacts of global climate change as most critical. In attempts to achieve ecosystem‐based sustainable development, most management teams strive for more risk‐robust and adaptive strategies by advocating for active risk management. A common factor identified among all case studies was the need for cooperative management between smaller conservation sites in order to address large‐scale challenges.Axel SchickPeter R. HobsonPierre L. IbischTaylor & Francis Grouparticleconservationdevelopmentecosystem‐based approachMARISCOVUCAEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcosystem Health and Sustainability, Vol 3, Iss 4 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic conservation
development
ecosystem‐based approach
MARISCO
VUCA
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle conservation
development
ecosystem‐based approach
MARISCO
VUCA
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Axel Schick
Peter R. Hobson
Pierre L. Ibisch
Conservation and sustainable development in a VUCA world: the need for a systemic and ecosystem‐based approach
description Targeting the maintenance of functional ecosystems that provide the significant basis for human well‐being is an integral part of an ecosystem‐based sustainable development. Underlying causes of ecosystem degradation such as global climate change and ever‐growing human demands that rapidly shift socioeconomic and political baselines are often unmanageable at a local scale and require a new approach to planning and action in ecosystem management. The framework conditions that challenge sustainable development are shaped by increasing Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, and Ambiguity (VUCA concept). Using the MARISCO method (adaptive management of vulnerability and risks at conservation sites), we analyzed 22 conservation sites, covering 26 protected areas and six administrative areas on four different continents and involving 524 participants. VUCA conditions were present across cultures and biomes, yet the responses in planning and management varied among conservation sites. The findings of both the qualitative and quantitative analyses confirm that participants understand how far human well‐being heavily depends on the functionality of ecosystems that were seen to suffer from a wide range of stresses and threats of varying criticality. Worldwide, local stakeholders and experts rated impacts of global climate change as most critical. In attempts to achieve ecosystem‐based sustainable development, most management teams strive for more risk‐robust and adaptive strategies by advocating for active risk management. A common factor identified among all case studies was the need for cooperative management between smaller conservation sites in order to address large‐scale challenges.
format article
author Axel Schick
Peter R. Hobson
Pierre L. Ibisch
author_facet Axel Schick
Peter R. Hobson
Pierre L. Ibisch
author_sort Axel Schick
title Conservation and sustainable development in a VUCA world: the need for a systemic and ecosystem‐based approach
title_short Conservation and sustainable development in a VUCA world: the need for a systemic and ecosystem‐based approach
title_full Conservation and sustainable development in a VUCA world: the need for a systemic and ecosystem‐based approach
title_fullStr Conservation and sustainable development in a VUCA world: the need for a systemic and ecosystem‐based approach
title_full_unstemmed Conservation and sustainable development in a VUCA world: the need for a systemic and ecosystem‐based approach
title_sort conservation and sustainable development in a vuca world: the need for a systemic and ecosystem‐based approach
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/cd9d2b21dbb84c19b19f771a0753370c
work_keys_str_mv AT axelschick conservationandsustainabledevelopmentinavucaworldtheneedforasystemicandecosystembasedapproach
AT peterrhobson conservationandsustainabledevelopmentinavucaworldtheneedforasystemicandecosystembasedapproach
AT pierrelibisch conservationandsustainabledevelopmentinavucaworldtheneedforasystemicandecosystembasedapproach
_version_ 1718392581804523520