Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of rotary instrumentation over manual instrumentation with ultrasonic irrigation on incidence, duration, and intensity of postendodontic pain: An In vivo study

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of rotary instrumentation over manual instrumentation with ultrasonic irrigation on incidence, duration, and intensity of postendodontic pain (PEP). Subjects and Methods: Eighty patients, with asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis in maxillary...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Ashutosh Shandilya, Subasish Behera, Gourav Kumar Sahu, Rashmi Rekha Mallick, Zakir Husain, Riddhima Chauhan
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021
Materias:	crown-down technique passive ultrasonic irrigation postendodontic pain single-visit endodontics step-back technique Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/cdb524306a594d2e96df3947c4d79e7e
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:cdb524306a594d2e96df3947c4d79e7e
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:cdb524306a594d2e96df3947c4d79e7e2021-11-19T12:15:52ZComparative evaluation of the effectiveness of rotary instrumentation over manual instrumentation with ultrasonic irrigation on incidence, duration, and intensity of postendodontic pain: An In vivo study0975-740610.4103/jpbs.jpbs_208_21https://doaj.org/article/cdb524306a594d2e96df3947c4d79e7e2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=1149;epage=1154;aulast=Shandilyahttps://doaj.org/toc/0975-7406Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of rotary instrumentation over manual instrumentation with ultrasonic irrigation on incidence, duration, and intensity of postendodontic pain (PEP). Subjects and Methods: Eighty patients, with asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis in maxillary anterior teeth, were selected and treated with single-visit endodontic treatment. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups (40 each), Group A (K files using step-back technique) and Group B (ProTaper Next using crown-down technique) along with passive ultrasonic irrigation. Patients were recalled, examined, and asked to fill up questionnaire after 24 h, 48 h, and 7 days. On the basis of response given in the feedback forms, incidence, duration, and intensity of PEP were evaluated. Results: Statistical analysis of the data was carried out using Chi-square test, and level of significance (P < 0.05) was evaluated. More incidence of pain was noticed in Group A when compared with Group B. Significant difference found between two groups (χ2 = 22.759; P = 0.001). There was also statistically significant difference between two groups at different time intervals. Conclusion: Both instrumentation techniques under investigation cause PEP. The incidence of pain was more in manual technique than rotary technique. The duration of pain was higher in manual group than rotary group at different time intervals.Ashutosh ShandilyaSubasish BeheraGourav Kumar SahuRashmi Rekha MallickZakir HusainRiddhima ChauhanWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsarticlecrown-down techniquepassive ultrasonic irrigationpostendodontic painsingle-visit endodonticsstep-back techniquePharmacy and materia medicaRS1-441Analytical chemistryQD71-142ENJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 6, Pp 1149-1154 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	crown-down technique passive ultrasonic irrigation postendodontic pain single-visit endodontics step-back technique Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142
spellingShingle	crown-down technique passive ultrasonic irrigation postendodontic pain single-visit endodontics step-back technique Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142 Ashutosh Shandilya Subasish Behera Gourav Kumar Sahu Rashmi Rekha Mallick Zakir Husain Riddhima Chauhan Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of rotary instrumentation over manual instrumentation with ultrasonic irrigation on incidence, duration, and intensity of postendodontic pain: An In vivo study
description	Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of rotary instrumentation over manual instrumentation with ultrasonic irrigation on incidence, duration, and intensity of postendodontic pain (PEP). Subjects and Methods: Eighty patients, with asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis in maxillary anterior teeth, were selected and treated with single-visit endodontic treatment. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups (40 each), Group A (K files using step-back technique) and Group B (ProTaper Next using crown-down technique) along with passive ultrasonic irrigation. Patients were recalled, examined, and asked to fill up questionnaire after 24 h, 48 h, and 7 days. On the basis of response given in the feedback forms, incidence, duration, and intensity of PEP were evaluated. Results: Statistical analysis of the data was carried out using Chi-square test, and level of significance (P < 0.05) was evaluated. More incidence of pain was noticed in Group A when compared with Group B. Significant difference found between two groups (χ2 = 22.759; P = 0.001). There was also statistically significant difference between two groups at different time intervals. Conclusion: Both instrumentation techniques under investigation cause PEP. The incidence of pain was more in manual technique than rotary technique. The duration of pain was higher in manual group than rotary group at different time intervals.
format	article
author	Ashutosh Shandilya Subasish Behera Gourav Kumar Sahu Rashmi Rekha Mallick Zakir Husain Riddhima Chauhan
author_facet	Ashutosh Shandilya Subasish Behera Gourav Kumar Sahu Rashmi Rekha Mallick Zakir Husain Riddhima Chauhan
author_sort	Ashutosh Shandilya
title	Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of rotary instrumentation over manual instrumentation with ultrasonic irrigation on incidence, duration, and intensity of postendodontic pain: An In vivo study
title_short	Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of rotary instrumentation over manual instrumentation with ultrasonic irrigation on incidence, duration, and intensity of postendodontic pain: An In vivo study
title_full	Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of rotary instrumentation over manual instrumentation with ultrasonic irrigation on incidence, duration, and intensity of postendodontic pain: An In vivo study
title_fullStr	Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of rotary instrumentation over manual instrumentation with ultrasonic irrigation on incidence, duration, and intensity of postendodontic pain: An In vivo study
title_full_unstemmed	Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of rotary instrumentation over manual instrumentation with ultrasonic irrigation on incidence, duration, and intensity of postendodontic pain: An In vivo study
title_sort	comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of rotary instrumentation over manual instrumentation with ultrasonic irrigation on incidence, duration, and intensity of postendodontic pain: an in vivo study
publisher	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/cdb524306a594d2e96df3947c4d79e7e
work_keys_str_mv	AT ashutoshshandilya comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofrotaryinstrumentationovermanualinstrumentationwithultrasonicirrigationonincidencedurationandintensityofpostendodonticpainaninvivostudy AT subasishbehera comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofrotaryinstrumentationovermanualinstrumentationwithultrasonicirrigationonincidencedurationandintensityofpostendodonticpainaninvivostudy AT gouravkumarsahu comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofrotaryinstrumentationovermanualinstrumentationwithultrasonicirrigationonincidencedurationandintensityofpostendodonticpainaninvivostudy AT rashmirekhamallick comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofrotaryinstrumentationovermanualinstrumentationwithultrasonicirrigationonincidencedurationandintensityofpostendodonticpainaninvivostudy AT zakirhusain comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofrotaryinstrumentationovermanualinstrumentationwithultrasonicirrigationonincidencedurationandintensityofpostendodonticpainaninvivostudy AT riddhimachauhan comparativeevaluationoftheeffectivenessofrotaryinstrumentationovermanualinstrumentationwithultrasonicirrigationonincidencedurationandintensityofpostendodonticpainaninvivostudy
_version_	1718420158645534720

Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of rotary instrumentation over manual instrumentation with ultrasonic irrigation on incidence, duration, and intensity of postendodontic pain: An In vivo study

Ejemplares similares