Histomorphometric and microarchitectural analysis of bone in metastatic breast cancer patients

Background: Despite widespread use of repeated doses of potent bone-targeting agents (BTA) in oncology patients, relatively little is known about their in vivo effects on bone homeostasis, bone quality, and bone architecture. Traditionally bone quality has been assessed using a trans-iliac bone biop...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: A. Beltran-Bless, M. Murshed, M. Zakikhani, I. Kuchuk, N. Bouganim, S. Robertson, N. Kekre, L. Vandermeer, J. Li, C.L. Addison, F. Rauch, M. Clemons, R. Kremer
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cdead4ab59484a35bca513740eba4eb6
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cdead4ab59484a35bca513740eba4eb6
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cdead4ab59484a35bca513740eba4eb62021-11-20T05:06:53ZHistomorphometric and microarchitectural analysis of bone in metastatic breast cancer patients2352-187210.1016/j.bonr.2021.101145https://doaj.org/article/cdead4ab59484a35bca513740eba4eb62021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352187221004022https://doaj.org/toc/2352-1872Background: Despite widespread use of repeated doses of potent bone-targeting agents (BTA) in oncology patients, relatively little is known about their in vivo effects on bone homeostasis, bone quality, and bone architecture. Traditionally bone quality has been assessed using a trans-iliac bone biopsy with a 7 mm “Bordier” core needle. We examined the feasibility of using a 2 mm “Jamshidi™” core needle as a more practical and less invasive technique. Methods: Patients with metastatic breast cancer on BTAs were divided according to the extent of bone metastases. They were given 2 courses of tetracycline labeling and then underwent a posterior trans-iliac trephine biopsy and bone marrow aspirate. Samples were analyzed for the extent of tumor invasion and parameters of bone turnover and bone formation by histomorphometry. Results: Twelve patients were accrued, 1 had no bone metastases, 3 had limited bone metastases (LSM) (<3 lesions) and 7 had extensive bone metastases (ESM) (>3 lesions). Most of the primary tumors were estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) positive. The procedure was well tolerated. The sample quality was sufficient to analyze bone trabecular structure and bone turnover by histomorphometry in 11 out of 12 patients. There was a good correlation between imaging data and morphometric analysis of tumor invasion. Patients with no evidence or minimal bone metastases had no evidence of tumor invasion. Most had suppressed bone turnover and no detectable bone formation when treated with BTA. In contrast, 6 out of 7 patients with extensive bone invasion by imaging and evidence of tumor cells in the marrow had intense osteoclastic activity as measured by the number of osteoclasts. Of these 7 patients with ESM, 6 were treated with BTA with 5 showing resistance to BTA as demonstrated by the high number of osteoclasts present. 3 of these 6 patients had active bone formation. Based on osteoblast activity and bone formation, 3 out of 6 patients with ESM responded to BTA compared to all 3 with LSM. Compared to untreated patients, all patients treated with BTA showed a trend towards suppression of bone formation, as measured by tetracycline labelling. There was also a trend towards a significant difference between ESM and LSM treated with BTA, highly suggestive of resistance although limited by the small sample size. Discussion: Our results indicate that trans-iliac bone biopsy using a 2 mm trephine shows excellent correlation between imaging assessment of tumor invasion and tumor burden by morphometric analysis of bone tissues. In addition, our approach provides additional mechanistic information on therapeutic response to BTA supporting the current clinical understanding that the majority of patients with extensive bone involvement eventually fail to suppress bone turnover (Petrut B, et al. 2008). This suggests that antiresorptive therapies become less effective as disease progresses.A. Beltran-BlessM. MurshedM. ZakikhaniI. KuchukN. BouganimS. RobertsonN. KekreL. VandermeerJ. LiC.L. AddisonF. RauchM. ClemonsR. KremerElsevierarticleBone-targeted agentsBreast cancerBone biopsyBone microarchitectureHistomorphometryBone turnoverDiseases of the musculoskeletal systemRC925-935ENBone Reports, Vol 15, Iss , Pp 101145- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Bone-targeted agents
Breast cancer
Bone biopsy
Bone microarchitecture
Histomorphometry
Bone turnover
Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
RC925-935
spellingShingle Bone-targeted agents
Breast cancer
Bone biopsy
Bone microarchitecture
Histomorphometry
Bone turnover
Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
RC925-935
A. Beltran-Bless
M. Murshed
M. Zakikhani
I. Kuchuk
N. Bouganim
S. Robertson
N. Kekre
L. Vandermeer
J. Li
C.L. Addison
F. Rauch
M. Clemons
R. Kremer
Histomorphometric and microarchitectural analysis of bone in metastatic breast cancer patients
description Background: Despite widespread use of repeated doses of potent bone-targeting agents (BTA) in oncology patients, relatively little is known about their in vivo effects on bone homeostasis, bone quality, and bone architecture. Traditionally bone quality has been assessed using a trans-iliac bone biopsy with a 7 mm “Bordier” core needle. We examined the feasibility of using a 2 mm “Jamshidi™” core needle as a more practical and less invasive technique. Methods: Patients with metastatic breast cancer on BTAs were divided according to the extent of bone metastases. They were given 2 courses of tetracycline labeling and then underwent a posterior trans-iliac trephine biopsy and bone marrow aspirate. Samples were analyzed for the extent of tumor invasion and parameters of bone turnover and bone formation by histomorphometry. Results: Twelve patients were accrued, 1 had no bone metastases, 3 had limited bone metastases (LSM) (<3 lesions) and 7 had extensive bone metastases (ESM) (>3 lesions). Most of the primary tumors were estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) positive. The procedure was well tolerated. The sample quality was sufficient to analyze bone trabecular structure and bone turnover by histomorphometry in 11 out of 12 patients. There was a good correlation between imaging data and morphometric analysis of tumor invasion. Patients with no evidence or minimal bone metastases had no evidence of tumor invasion. Most had suppressed bone turnover and no detectable bone formation when treated with BTA. In contrast, 6 out of 7 patients with extensive bone invasion by imaging and evidence of tumor cells in the marrow had intense osteoclastic activity as measured by the number of osteoclasts. Of these 7 patients with ESM, 6 were treated with BTA with 5 showing resistance to BTA as demonstrated by the high number of osteoclasts present. 3 of these 6 patients had active bone formation. Based on osteoblast activity and bone formation, 3 out of 6 patients with ESM responded to BTA compared to all 3 with LSM. Compared to untreated patients, all patients treated with BTA showed a trend towards suppression of bone formation, as measured by tetracycline labelling. There was also a trend towards a significant difference between ESM and LSM treated with BTA, highly suggestive of resistance although limited by the small sample size. Discussion: Our results indicate that trans-iliac bone biopsy using a 2 mm trephine shows excellent correlation between imaging assessment of tumor invasion and tumor burden by morphometric analysis of bone tissues. In addition, our approach provides additional mechanistic information on therapeutic response to BTA supporting the current clinical understanding that the majority of patients with extensive bone involvement eventually fail to suppress bone turnover (Petrut B, et al. 2008). This suggests that antiresorptive therapies become less effective as disease progresses.
format article
author A. Beltran-Bless
M. Murshed
M. Zakikhani
I. Kuchuk
N. Bouganim
S. Robertson
N. Kekre
L. Vandermeer
J. Li
C.L. Addison
F. Rauch
M. Clemons
R. Kremer
author_facet A. Beltran-Bless
M. Murshed
M. Zakikhani
I. Kuchuk
N. Bouganim
S. Robertson
N. Kekre
L. Vandermeer
J. Li
C.L. Addison
F. Rauch
M. Clemons
R. Kremer
author_sort A. Beltran-Bless
title Histomorphometric and microarchitectural analysis of bone in metastatic breast cancer patients
title_short Histomorphometric and microarchitectural analysis of bone in metastatic breast cancer patients
title_full Histomorphometric and microarchitectural analysis of bone in metastatic breast cancer patients
title_fullStr Histomorphometric and microarchitectural analysis of bone in metastatic breast cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Histomorphometric and microarchitectural analysis of bone in metastatic breast cancer patients
title_sort histomorphometric and microarchitectural analysis of bone in metastatic breast cancer patients
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/cdead4ab59484a35bca513740eba4eb6
work_keys_str_mv AT abeltranbless histomorphometricandmicroarchitecturalanalysisofboneinmetastaticbreastcancerpatients
AT mmurshed histomorphometricandmicroarchitecturalanalysisofboneinmetastaticbreastcancerpatients
AT mzakikhani histomorphometricandmicroarchitecturalanalysisofboneinmetastaticbreastcancerpatients
AT ikuchuk histomorphometricandmicroarchitecturalanalysisofboneinmetastaticbreastcancerpatients
AT nbouganim histomorphometricandmicroarchitecturalanalysisofboneinmetastaticbreastcancerpatients
AT srobertson histomorphometricandmicroarchitecturalanalysisofboneinmetastaticbreastcancerpatients
AT nkekre histomorphometricandmicroarchitecturalanalysisofboneinmetastaticbreastcancerpatients
AT lvandermeer histomorphometricandmicroarchitecturalanalysisofboneinmetastaticbreastcancerpatients
AT jli histomorphometricandmicroarchitecturalanalysisofboneinmetastaticbreastcancerpatients
AT claddison histomorphometricandmicroarchitecturalanalysisofboneinmetastaticbreastcancerpatients
AT frauch histomorphometricandmicroarchitecturalanalysisofboneinmetastaticbreastcancerpatients
AT mclemons histomorphometricandmicroarchitecturalanalysisofboneinmetastaticbreastcancerpatients
AT rkremer histomorphometricandmicroarchitecturalanalysisofboneinmetastaticbreastcancerpatients
_version_ 1718419623643185152