Proximal-Sensing-Powered Modelling of Energy-Water Fluxes in a Vineyard: A Spatial Resolution Analysis

Spatial resolution is a key parameter in energy–water surface flux modelling. In this research, scale effects are analyzed on fluxes modelled with the FEST-EWB model, by upscaling both its inputs and outputs separately. The main questions are: (a) if high-resolution remote sensing images are necessa...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nicola Paciolla, Chiara Corbari, Antonino Maltese, Giuseppe Ciraolo, Marco Mancini
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cdf01501161e40e38f716e9b1bdd6791
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cdf01501161e40e38f716e9b1bdd6791
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cdf01501161e40e38f716e9b1bdd67912021-11-25T18:55:31ZProximal-Sensing-Powered Modelling of Energy-Water Fluxes in a Vineyard: A Spatial Resolution Analysis10.3390/rs132246992072-4292https://doaj.org/article/cdf01501161e40e38f716e9b1bdd67912021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/22/4699https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292Spatial resolution is a key parameter in energy–water surface flux modelling. In this research, scale effects are analyzed on fluxes modelled with the FEST-EWB model, by upscaling both its inputs and outputs separately. The main questions are: (a) if high-resolution remote sensing images are necessary to accurately model a heterogeneous area; and (b) whether and to what extent low-resolution modelling provides worse/better results than the upscaled results of high-resolution modelling. The study area is an experimental vineyard field where proximal sensing images were obtained by an airborne platform and verification fluxes were measured via a flux tower. Modelled fluxes are in line with those from alternative energy-balance models, and quite accurate (NSE = 0.78) with respect to those measured in situ. Field-scale evapotranspiration has resulted in both the tested upscaling approaches (with relative error within ±30%), although fewer pixels available for low-resolution calibration may produce some differences. When working at low resolutions, the model has produced higher relative errors (20% on average), but is still within acceptable bounds. This means that the model can produce high-quality results, partially compensating for the loss in spatial heterogeneity associated with low-resolution images.Nicola PaciollaChiara CorbariAntonino MalteseGiuseppe CiraoloMarco ManciniMDPI AGarticleevapotranspirationenergy-balance modelspatial resolutionvineyardupscalingScienceQENRemote Sensing, Vol 13, Iss 4699, p 4699 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic evapotranspiration
energy-balance model
spatial resolution
vineyard
upscaling
Science
Q
spellingShingle evapotranspiration
energy-balance model
spatial resolution
vineyard
upscaling
Science
Q
Nicola Paciolla
Chiara Corbari
Antonino Maltese
Giuseppe Ciraolo
Marco Mancini
Proximal-Sensing-Powered Modelling of Energy-Water Fluxes in a Vineyard: A Spatial Resolution Analysis
description Spatial resolution is a key parameter in energy–water surface flux modelling. In this research, scale effects are analyzed on fluxes modelled with the FEST-EWB model, by upscaling both its inputs and outputs separately. The main questions are: (a) if high-resolution remote sensing images are necessary to accurately model a heterogeneous area; and (b) whether and to what extent low-resolution modelling provides worse/better results than the upscaled results of high-resolution modelling. The study area is an experimental vineyard field where proximal sensing images were obtained by an airborne platform and verification fluxes were measured via a flux tower. Modelled fluxes are in line with those from alternative energy-balance models, and quite accurate (NSE = 0.78) with respect to those measured in situ. Field-scale evapotranspiration has resulted in both the tested upscaling approaches (with relative error within ±30%), although fewer pixels available for low-resolution calibration may produce some differences. When working at low resolutions, the model has produced higher relative errors (20% on average), but is still within acceptable bounds. This means that the model can produce high-quality results, partially compensating for the loss in spatial heterogeneity associated with low-resolution images.
format article
author Nicola Paciolla
Chiara Corbari
Antonino Maltese
Giuseppe Ciraolo
Marco Mancini
author_facet Nicola Paciolla
Chiara Corbari
Antonino Maltese
Giuseppe Ciraolo
Marco Mancini
author_sort Nicola Paciolla
title Proximal-Sensing-Powered Modelling of Energy-Water Fluxes in a Vineyard: A Spatial Resolution Analysis
title_short Proximal-Sensing-Powered Modelling of Energy-Water Fluxes in a Vineyard: A Spatial Resolution Analysis
title_full Proximal-Sensing-Powered Modelling of Energy-Water Fluxes in a Vineyard: A Spatial Resolution Analysis
title_fullStr Proximal-Sensing-Powered Modelling of Energy-Water Fluxes in a Vineyard: A Spatial Resolution Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Proximal-Sensing-Powered Modelling of Energy-Water Fluxes in a Vineyard: A Spatial Resolution Analysis
title_sort proximal-sensing-powered modelling of energy-water fluxes in a vineyard: a spatial resolution analysis
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/cdf01501161e40e38f716e9b1bdd6791
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolapaciolla proximalsensingpoweredmodellingofenergywaterfluxesinavineyardaspatialresolutionanalysis
AT chiaracorbari proximalsensingpoweredmodellingofenergywaterfluxesinavineyardaspatialresolutionanalysis
AT antoninomaltese proximalsensingpoweredmodellingofenergywaterfluxesinavineyardaspatialresolutionanalysis
AT giuseppeciraolo proximalsensingpoweredmodellingofenergywaterfluxesinavineyardaspatialresolutionanalysis
AT marcomancini proximalsensingpoweredmodellingofenergywaterfluxesinavineyardaspatialresolutionanalysis
_version_ 1718410554752630784