Post-Operative Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer: Is It Time for a Belt and Braces Approach?

Approximately 30% of patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancers experience biochemical recurrence (BCR). Post-operative radiation therapy (RT) can be either offered immediately after the surgery in case of aggressive pathological features or proposed early if BCR occurs. U...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nicolas Giraud, Nicolas Benziane-Ouaritini, Ulrike Schick, Jean-Baptiste Beauval, Ahmad Chaddad, Tamim Niazi, Mame Daro Faye, Stéphane Supiot, Paul Sargos, Igor Latorzeff
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ce1ee3b582eb43c3b4c51eb198d77f9e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ce1ee3b582eb43c3b4c51eb198d77f9e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ce1ee3b582eb43c3b4c51eb198d77f9e2021-11-22T13:17:35ZPost-Operative Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer: Is It Time for a Belt and Braces Approach?2234-943X10.3389/fonc.2021.781040https://doaj.org/article/ce1ee3b582eb43c3b4c51eb198d77f9e2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.781040/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2234-943XApproximately 30% of patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancers experience biochemical recurrence (BCR). Post-operative radiation therapy (RT) can be either offered immediately after the surgery in case of aggressive pathological features or proposed early if BCR occurs. Until recently, little data were available regarding the optimal RT timing, protocol, volumes to treat, and the benefit of adding androgen deprivation therapies to post-operative RT. In this review, we aim to pragmatically discuss current literature data on these points. Early salvage RT appears to be the optimal post-operative approach, improving oncological outcomes especially with low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, as well as sparing several unnecessary adjuvant treatments. The standard RT dose is still 64–66 Gy to the prostate bed in conventional fractionation, but hypofractionation protocols are emerging pending on late toxicity data. Several scientific societies have published contouring atlases, even though they are heterogeneous and deserve future consensus. During salvage RT, the inclusion of pelvic lymph nodes is also controversial, but preliminary data show a possible benefit for PSA > 0.34 ng/ml at the cost of increased hematological side effects. Concomitant ADT and its duration are also discussed, possibly advantageous (at least in terms of metastasis-free survival) for PSA rates over 0.6 ng/ml, taking into account life expectancy and cardiovascular comorbidities. Intensified regimens, for instance, with new-generation hormone therapies, could further improve outcomes in carefully selected patients. Finally, recent advances in molecular imaging, as well as upcoming breakthroughs in genomics and artificial intelligence tools, could soon reshuffle the cards of the current therapeutic strategy.Nicolas GiraudNicolas Benziane-OuaritiniUlrike SchickJean-Baptiste BeauvalAhmad ChaddadTamim NiaziMame Daro FayeStéphane SupiotPaul SargosIgor LatorzeffFrontiers Media S.A.articleprostate cancerradiotherapyradical prostatectomybiochemical progressionandrogen deprivation therapyNeoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensRC254-282ENFrontiers in Oncology, Vol 11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic prostate cancer
radiotherapy
radical prostatectomy
biochemical progression
androgen deprivation therapy
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
spellingShingle prostate cancer
radiotherapy
radical prostatectomy
biochemical progression
androgen deprivation therapy
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
Nicolas Giraud
Nicolas Benziane-Ouaritini
Ulrike Schick
Jean-Baptiste Beauval
Ahmad Chaddad
Tamim Niazi
Mame Daro Faye
Stéphane Supiot
Paul Sargos
Igor Latorzeff
Post-Operative Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer: Is It Time for a Belt and Braces Approach?
description Approximately 30% of patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancers experience biochemical recurrence (BCR). Post-operative radiation therapy (RT) can be either offered immediately after the surgery in case of aggressive pathological features or proposed early if BCR occurs. Until recently, little data were available regarding the optimal RT timing, protocol, volumes to treat, and the benefit of adding androgen deprivation therapies to post-operative RT. In this review, we aim to pragmatically discuss current literature data on these points. Early salvage RT appears to be the optimal post-operative approach, improving oncological outcomes especially with low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, as well as sparing several unnecessary adjuvant treatments. The standard RT dose is still 64–66 Gy to the prostate bed in conventional fractionation, but hypofractionation protocols are emerging pending on late toxicity data. Several scientific societies have published contouring atlases, even though they are heterogeneous and deserve future consensus. During salvage RT, the inclusion of pelvic lymph nodes is also controversial, but preliminary data show a possible benefit for PSA > 0.34 ng/ml at the cost of increased hematological side effects. Concomitant ADT and its duration are also discussed, possibly advantageous (at least in terms of metastasis-free survival) for PSA rates over 0.6 ng/ml, taking into account life expectancy and cardiovascular comorbidities. Intensified regimens, for instance, with new-generation hormone therapies, could further improve outcomes in carefully selected patients. Finally, recent advances in molecular imaging, as well as upcoming breakthroughs in genomics and artificial intelligence tools, could soon reshuffle the cards of the current therapeutic strategy.
format article
author Nicolas Giraud
Nicolas Benziane-Ouaritini
Ulrike Schick
Jean-Baptiste Beauval
Ahmad Chaddad
Tamim Niazi
Mame Daro Faye
Stéphane Supiot
Paul Sargos
Igor Latorzeff
author_facet Nicolas Giraud
Nicolas Benziane-Ouaritini
Ulrike Schick
Jean-Baptiste Beauval
Ahmad Chaddad
Tamim Niazi
Mame Daro Faye
Stéphane Supiot
Paul Sargos
Igor Latorzeff
author_sort Nicolas Giraud
title Post-Operative Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer: Is It Time for a Belt and Braces Approach?
title_short Post-Operative Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer: Is It Time for a Belt and Braces Approach?
title_full Post-Operative Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer: Is It Time for a Belt and Braces Approach?
title_fullStr Post-Operative Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer: Is It Time for a Belt and Braces Approach?
title_full_unstemmed Post-Operative Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer: Is It Time for a Belt and Braces Approach?
title_sort post-operative radiotherapy in prostate cancer: is it time for a belt and braces approach?
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/ce1ee3b582eb43c3b4c51eb198d77f9e
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolasgiraud postoperativeradiotherapyinprostatecancerisittimeforabeltandbracesapproach
AT nicolasbenzianeouaritini postoperativeradiotherapyinprostatecancerisittimeforabeltandbracesapproach
AT ulrikeschick postoperativeradiotherapyinprostatecancerisittimeforabeltandbracesapproach
AT jeanbaptistebeauval postoperativeradiotherapyinprostatecancerisittimeforabeltandbracesapproach
AT ahmadchaddad postoperativeradiotherapyinprostatecancerisittimeforabeltandbracesapproach
AT tamimniazi postoperativeradiotherapyinprostatecancerisittimeforabeltandbracesapproach
AT mamedarofaye postoperativeradiotherapyinprostatecancerisittimeforabeltandbracesapproach
AT stephanesupiot postoperativeradiotherapyinprostatecancerisittimeforabeltandbracesapproach
AT paulsargos postoperativeradiotherapyinprostatecancerisittimeforabeltandbracesapproach
AT igorlatorzeff postoperativeradiotherapyinprostatecancerisittimeforabeltandbracesapproach
_version_ 1718417580231753728