Brain repair: cell therapy in stroke

Dheeraj Kalladka, Keith W Muir Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom Abstract: Stroke affects one in every six people worldwide, and is the leading cause of adult disability. Some spontaneous recovery is usual but of lim...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kalladka D, Muir KW
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ce3c4bcca1874dd2b13cbd9be7729e39
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ce3c4bcca1874dd2b13cbd9be7729e39
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ce3c4bcca1874dd2b13cbd9be7729e392021-12-02T06:08:56ZBrain repair: cell therapy in stroke1178-6957https://doaj.org/article/ce3c4bcca1874dd2b13cbd9be7729e392014-02-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/brain-repair-cell-therapy-in-stroke-a15928https://doaj.org/toc/1178-6957 Dheeraj Kalladka, Keith W Muir Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom Abstract: Stroke affects one in every six people worldwide, and is the leading cause of adult disability. Some spontaneous recovery is usual but of limited extent, and the mechanisms of late recovery are not completely understood. Endogenous neurogenesis in humans is thought to contribute to repair, but its extent is unknown. Exogenous cell therapy is promising as a means of augmenting brain repair, with evidence in animal stroke models of cell migration, survival, and differentiation, enhanced endogenous angiogenesis and neurogenesis, immunomodulation, and the secretion of trophic factors by stem cells from a variety of sources, but the potential mechanisms of action are incompletely understood. In the animal models of stroke, both mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and neural stem cells (NSCs) improve functional recovery, and MSCs reduce the infarct volume when administered acutely, but the heterogeneity in the choice of assessment scales, publication bias, and the possible confounding effects of immunosuppressants make the comparison of effects across cell types difficult. The use of adult-derived cells avoids the ethical issues around embryonic cells but may have more restricted differentiation potential. The use of autologous cells avoids rejection risk, but the sources are restricted, and culture expansion may be necessary, delaying treatment. Allogeneic cells offer controlled cell numbers and immediate availability, which may have advantages for acute treatment. Early clinical trials of both NSCs and MSCs are ongoing, and clinical safety data are emerging from limited numbers of selected patients. Ongoing research to identify prognostic imaging markers may help to improve patient selection, and the novel imaging techniques may identify biomarkers of recovery and the mechanism of action for cell therapies. Keywords: stroke, cerebrovascular disease, cell therapy, neurological diseaseKalladka DMuir KWDove Medical PressarticleCytologyQH573-671ENStem Cells and Cloning: Advances and Applications, Vol 2014, Iss default, Pp 31-44 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Cytology
QH573-671
spellingShingle Cytology
QH573-671
Kalladka D
Muir KW
Brain repair: cell therapy in stroke
description Dheeraj Kalladka, Keith W Muir Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom Abstract: Stroke affects one in every six people worldwide, and is the leading cause of adult disability. Some spontaneous recovery is usual but of limited extent, and the mechanisms of late recovery are not completely understood. Endogenous neurogenesis in humans is thought to contribute to repair, but its extent is unknown. Exogenous cell therapy is promising as a means of augmenting brain repair, with evidence in animal stroke models of cell migration, survival, and differentiation, enhanced endogenous angiogenesis and neurogenesis, immunomodulation, and the secretion of trophic factors by stem cells from a variety of sources, but the potential mechanisms of action are incompletely understood. In the animal models of stroke, both mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and neural stem cells (NSCs) improve functional recovery, and MSCs reduce the infarct volume when administered acutely, but the heterogeneity in the choice of assessment scales, publication bias, and the possible confounding effects of immunosuppressants make the comparison of effects across cell types difficult. The use of adult-derived cells avoids the ethical issues around embryonic cells but may have more restricted differentiation potential. The use of autologous cells avoids rejection risk, but the sources are restricted, and culture expansion may be necessary, delaying treatment. Allogeneic cells offer controlled cell numbers and immediate availability, which may have advantages for acute treatment. Early clinical trials of both NSCs and MSCs are ongoing, and clinical safety data are emerging from limited numbers of selected patients. Ongoing research to identify prognostic imaging markers may help to improve patient selection, and the novel imaging techniques may identify biomarkers of recovery and the mechanism of action for cell therapies. Keywords: stroke, cerebrovascular disease, cell therapy, neurological disease
format article
author Kalladka D
Muir KW
author_facet Kalladka D
Muir KW
author_sort Kalladka D
title Brain repair: cell therapy in stroke
title_short Brain repair: cell therapy in stroke
title_full Brain repair: cell therapy in stroke
title_fullStr Brain repair: cell therapy in stroke
title_full_unstemmed Brain repair: cell therapy in stroke
title_sort brain repair: cell therapy in stroke
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/ce3c4bcca1874dd2b13cbd9be7729e39
work_keys_str_mv AT kalladkad brainrepaircelltherapyinstroke
AT muirkw brainrepaircelltherapyinstroke
_version_ 1718400077540622336