Quantitative dual-energy CT for evaluating hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization

Abstract We aimed to investigate the role of the quantitative parameters of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in evaluating patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated by transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). We retrospectively identified 80 HCC patients (mean age, 56 years; 61 men)...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiaofei Yue, Qiqi Jiang, Xuehan Hu, Chunyuan Cen, Songlin Song, Kun Qian, Yuting Lu, Ming Yang, Qian Li, Ping Han
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ce6a8ac71e554774afe7e27b687d1f55
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ce6a8ac71e554774afe7e27b687d1f55
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ce6a8ac71e554774afe7e27b687d1f552021-12-02T15:49:50ZQuantitative dual-energy CT for evaluating hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization10.1038/s41598-021-90508-92045-2322https://doaj.org/article/ce6a8ac71e554774afe7e27b687d1f552021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90508-9https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract We aimed to investigate the role of the quantitative parameters of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in evaluating patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated by transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). We retrospectively identified 80 HCC patients (mean age, 56 years; 61 men) treated by TACE who received contrast-enhanced DECT and were retreated by TACE within 7 days between November 2018 and December 2019. Taking digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and CT images as reference standard, two readers measured and calculated the values of normalized iodine concentration at arterial phase (NICAP), normalized iodine concentration at portal venous phase (NICPP), iodine concentration difference (ICD), arterial iodine fraction (AIF) and slope of the spectral Hounsfield unit curve (λHu) by placing matched regions of interests (ROIs) within the tumor active area (TAA), adjacent normal hepatic parenchyma (ANHP) and tumor necrotic area (TNA). Differences between the parameters were analyzed by the Kruskal–Wallis H test. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the parameters performance in differentiating the three tissues types was performed. AIF exhibited a good performance in distinguishing TAA (0.93 ± 0.31) and ANHP (0.18 ± 0.14), the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.989, while the λHu exhibited an excellent performance in distinguishing TAA (3.32 ± 1.24) and TNA (0.29 ± 0.27), with an AUC of 1.000. In conclusion, quantitative DECT can be effectively used to evaluate the tumor viability in HCC patients treated by TACE.Xiaofei YueQiqi JiangXuehan HuChunyuan CenSonglin SongKun QianYuting LuMing YangQian LiPing HanNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Xiaofei Yue
Qiqi Jiang
Xuehan Hu
Chunyuan Cen
Songlin Song
Kun Qian
Yuting Lu
Ming Yang
Qian Li
Ping Han
Quantitative dual-energy CT for evaluating hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization
description Abstract We aimed to investigate the role of the quantitative parameters of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in evaluating patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated by transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). We retrospectively identified 80 HCC patients (mean age, 56 years; 61 men) treated by TACE who received contrast-enhanced DECT and were retreated by TACE within 7 days between November 2018 and December 2019. Taking digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and CT images as reference standard, two readers measured and calculated the values of normalized iodine concentration at arterial phase (NICAP), normalized iodine concentration at portal venous phase (NICPP), iodine concentration difference (ICD), arterial iodine fraction (AIF) and slope of the spectral Hounsfield unit curve (λHu) by placing matched regions of interests (ROIs) within the tumor active area (TAA), adjacent normal hepatic parenchyma (ANHP) and tumor necrotic area (TNA). Differences between the parameters were analyzed by the Kruskal–Wallis H test. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the parameters performance in differentiating the three tissues types was performed. AIF exhibited a good performance in distinguishing TAA (0.93 ± 0.31) and ANHP (0.18 ± 0.14), the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.989, while the λHu exhibited an excellent performance in distinguishing TAA (3.32 ± 1.24) and TNA (0.29 ± 0.27), with an AUC of 1.000. In conclusion, quantitative DECT can be effectively used to evaluate the tumor viability in HCC patients treated by TACE.
format article
author Xiaofei Yue
Qiqi Jiang
Xuehan Hu
Chunyuan Cen
Songlin Song
Kun Qian
Yuting Lu
Ming Yang
Qian Li
Ping Han
author_facet Xiaofei Yue
Qiqi Jiang
Xuehan Hu
Chunyuan Cen
Songlin Song
Kun Qian
Yuting Lu
Ming Yang
Qian Li
Ping Han
author_sort Xiaofei Yue
title Quantitative dual-energy CT for evaluating hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization
title_short Quantitative dual-energy CT for evaluating hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization
title_full Quantitative dual-energy CT for evaluating hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization
title_fullStr Quantitative dual-energy CT for evaluating hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative dual-energy CT for evaluating hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization
title_sort quantitative dual-energy ct for evaluating hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/ce6a8ac71e554774afe7e27b687d1f55
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaofeiyue quantitativedualenergyctforevaluatinghepatocellularcarcinomaaftertransarterialchemoembolization
AT qiqijiang quantitativedualenergyctforevaluatinghepatocellularcarcinomaaftertransarterialchemoembolization
AT xuehanhu quantitativedualenergyctforevaluatinghepatocellularcarcinomaaftertransarterialchemoembolization
AT chunyuancen quantitativedualenergyctforevaluatinghepatocellularcarcinomaaftertransarterialchemoembolization
AT songlinsong quantitativedualenergyctforevaluatinghepatocellularcarcinomaaftertransarterialchemoembolization
AT kunqian quantitativedualenergyctforevaluatinghepatocellularcarcinomaaftertransarterialchemoembolization
AT yutinglu quantitativedualenergyctforevaluatinghepatocellularcarcinomaaftertransarterialchemoembolization
AT mingyang quantitativedualenergyctforevaluatinghepatocellularcarcinomaaftertransarterialchemoembolization
AT qianli quantitativedualenergyctforevaluatinghepatocellularcarcinomaaftertransarterialchemoembolization
AT pinghan quantitativedualenergyctforevaluatinghepatocellularcarcinomaaftertransarterialchemoembolization
_version_ 1718385719126261760