Global Health Education Programs in the Americas: A Scoping Review

Background: The interest in Global Health (GH) as an academic discipline has increased in the last decade. This article reports the findings of a scoping review of studies about Global Health education in the Americas. Objective: To analyse educational programs on global health in the Americas. Meth...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Isabel Amélia Costa Mendes, Carla Aparecida Arena Ventura, Artur Acelino Francisco Luz Nunes Queiroz, Álvaro Francisco Lopes de Sousa
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ce8a00f5e9fd4e158b748f6c57873fea
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ce8a00f5e9fd4e158b748f6c57873fea
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ce8a00f5e9fd4e158b748f6c57873fea2021-12-02T08:33:50ZGlobal Health Education Programs in the Americas: A Scoping Review2214-999610.5334/aogh.2745https://doaj.org/article/ce8a00f5e9fd4e158b748f6c57873fea2020-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://annalsofglobalhealth.org/articles/2745https://doaj.org/toc/2214-9996Background: The interest in Global Health (GH) as an academic discipline has increased in the last decade. This article reports the findings of a scoping review of studies about Global Health education in the Americas. Objective: To analyse educational programs on global health in the Americas. Method: Five electronic databases were used in a scoping review: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, CINAHL, and Lilacs. Data collection happened in November 2017–March 2018. The following stages were rigorously observed: identification, selection, charting, and summarizing the studies that were included. To process the data, we used IRaMuTeQ software. Findings: Forty-six studies were identified and organized in categories: 1) diversity of the topics addressed in GH; 2) models of teaching; 3) emotional, cultural, and collaborative aspects in teaching GH; 4) student preparation for GH experiences; and 5) structures required for a GH course. Conclusions: The existing global health curriculum in the Americas is diffuse and limited, with a greater focus on clinical aspects. Thus, a minimum curriculum for students from different areas is needed. Results evidenced that the teaching of global health in the Americas is still incipient, although it is promising. The lack of a common curriculum for the courses in the region makes it difficult to train sensitive and capable professionals to achieve the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals.Isabel Amélia Costa MendesCarla Aparecida Arena VenturaArtur Acelino Francisco Luz Nunes QueirozÁlvaro Francisco Lopes de SousaUbiquity PressarticleInfectious and parasitic diseasesRC109-216Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENAnnals of Global Health, Vol 86, Iss 1 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Isabel Amélia Costa Mendes
Carla Aparecida Arena Ventura
Artur Acelino Francisco Luz Nunes Queiroz
Álvaro Francisco Lopes de Sousa
Global Health Education Programs in the Americas: A Scoping Review
description Background: The interest in Global Health (GH) as an academic discipline has increased in the last decade. This article reports the findings of a scoping review of studies about Global Health education in the Americas. Objective: To analyse educational programs on global health in the Americas. Method: Five electronic databases were used in a scoping review: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, CINAHL, and Lilacs. Data collection happened in November 2017–March 2018. The following stages were rigorously observed: identification, selection, charting, and summarizing the studies that were included. To process the data, we used IRaMuTeQ software. Findings: Forty-six studies were identified and organized in categories: 1) diversity of the topics addressed in GH; 2) models of teaching; 3) emotional, cultural, and collaborative aspects in teaching GH; 4) student preparation for GH experiences; and 5) structures required for a GH course. Conclusions: The existing global health curriculum in the Americas is diffuse and limited, with a greater focus on clinical aspects. Thus, a minimum curriculum for students from different areas is needed. Results evidenced that the teaching of global health in the Americas is still incipient, although it is promising. The lack of a common curriculum for the courses in the region makes it difficult to train sensitive and capable professionals to achieve the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals.
format article
author Isabel Amélia Costa Mendes
Carla Aparecida Arena Ventura
Artur Acelino Francisco Luz Nunes Queiroz
Álvaro Francisco Lopes de Sousa
author_facet Isabel Amélia Costa Mendes
Carla Aparecida Arena Ventura
Artur Acelino Francisco Luz Nunes Queiroz
Álvaro Francisco Lopes de Sousa
author_sort Isabel Amélia Costa Mendes
title Global Health Education Programs in the Americas: A Scoping Review
title_short Global Health Education Programs in the Americas: A Scoping Review
title_full Global Health Education Programs in the Americas: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Global Health Education Programs in the Americas: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Global Health Education Programs in the Americas: A Scoping Review
title_sort global health education programs in the americas: a scoping review
publisher Ubiquity Press
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/ce8a00f5e9fd4e158b748f6c57873fea
work_keys_str_mv AT isabelameliacostamendes globalhealtheducationprogramsintheamericasascopingreview
AT carlaaparecidaarenaventura globalhealtheducationprogramsintheamericasascopingreview
AT arturacelinofranciscoluznunesqueiroz globalhealtheducationprogramsintheamericasascopingreview
AT alvarofranciscolopesdesousa globalhealtheducationprogramsintheamericasascopingreview
_version_ 1718398508480856064