A comparative survey of ligation of uterine tubes by laparoscopy Filshie Clips and Modified Minilaparotomy Pomeroy technique

Objective: To compare two methods of sterilization, 196 women who intended to undergo tubal sterilization, were randomly assigned to sterilization either by Filshie clips laparoscopy (96 cases) or modified Pomeroy minilaparotomy technique (100 cases). Methods: We compared the time of operation, surg...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Gh Seidi Alavi, N Saghafi, M Pakdaman
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FA
Publicado:	Babol University of Medical Sciences 2000
Materias:	sterilization minilaparotomy laparoscopy filshie clips Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/ce9c2593914f4589977d6419f7b22387
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:ce9c2593914f4589977d6419f7b22387
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:ce9c2593914f4589977d6419f7b223872021-11-10T09:22:07ZA comparative survey of ligation of uterine tubes by laparoscopy Filshie Clips and Modified Minilaparotomy Pomeroy technique1561-41072251-7170https://doaj.org/article/ce9c2593914f4589977d6419f7b223872000-04-01T00:00:00Zhttp://jbums.org/article-1-2910-en.htmlhttps://doaj.org/toc/1561-4107https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7170Objective: To compare two methods of sterilization, 196 women who intended to undergo tubal sterilization, were randomly assigned to sterilization either by Filshie clips laparoscopy (96 cases) or modified Pomeroy minilaparotomy technique (100 cases). Methods: We compared the time of operation, surgical complication, post operative pain and wound infection and after a long term follow up of (1-4 years) compared the changes in menstrual indices, pelvic pain and method failure. Findings: With the exception of severe and moderate postoperative pain, no statistically significant difference could be identified after evaluation of other complications (P<0.05). The failure rate was 1.72% for clips laparoscopy group but no pregnancy was found in pomeroy minilaparotomy group. Minilaparotomy however, needs less equipment and training. Regarding safety and effectiveness of the method and fewer post-surgical complications. However, the differences found in this study are not so significant. If can individual physician prefers this surgical approach, then the results will be favorable. Conclusion: This method seems to be considerably advantageous.Gh Seidi AlaviN SaghafiM PakdamanBabol University of Medical Sciencesarticlesterilizationminilaparotomylaparoscopyfilshie clipsMedicineRMedicine (General)R5-920ENFAMajallah-i Dānishgāh-i ̒Ulūm-i Pizishkī-i Bābul, Vol 2, Iss 2, Pp 33-39 (2000)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FA
topic	sterilization minilaparotomy laparoscopy filshie clips Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920
spellingShingle	sterilization minilaparotomy laparoscopy filshie clips Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920 Gh Seidi Alavi N Saghafi M Pakdaman A comparative survey of ligation of uterine tubes by laparoscopy Filshie Clips and Modified Minilaparotomy Pomeroy technique
description	Objective: To compare two methods of sterilization, 196 women who intended to undergo tubal sterilization, were randomly assigned to sterilization either by Filshie clips laparoscopy (96 cases) or modified Pomeroy minilaparotomy technique (100 cases). Methods: We compared the time of operation, surgical complication, post operative pain and wound infection and after a long term follow up of (1-4 years) compared the changes in menstrual indices, pelvic pain and method failure. Findings: With the exception of severe and moderate postoperative pain, no statistically significant difference could be identified after evaluation of other complications (P<0.05). The failure rate was 1.72% for clips laparoscopy group but no pregnancy was found in pomeroy minilaparotomy group. Minilaparotomy however, needs less equipment and training. Regarding safety and effectiveness of the method and fewer post-surgical complications. However, the differences found in this study are not so significant. If can individual physician prefers this surgical approach, then the results will be favorable. Conclusion: This method seems to be considerably advantageous.
format	article
author	Gh Seidi Alavi N Saghafi M Pakdaman
author_facet	Gh Seidi Alavi N Saghafi M Pakdaman
author_sort	Gh Seidi Alavi
title	A comparative survey of ligation of uterine tubes by laparoscopy Filshie Clips and Modified Minilaparotomy Pomeroy technique
title_short	A comparative survey of ligation of uterine tubes by laparoscopy Filshie Clips and Modified Minilaparotomy Pomeroy technique
title_full	A comparative survey of ligation of uterine tubes by laparoscopy Filshie Clips and Modified Minilaparotomy Pomeroy technique
title_fullStr	A comparative survey of ligation of uterine tubes by laparoscopy Filshie Clips and Modified Minilaparotomy Pomeroy technique
title_full_unstemmed	A comparative survey of ligation of uterine tubes by laparoscopy Filshie Clips and Modified Minilaparotomy Pomeroy technique
title_sort	comparative survey of ligation of uterine tubes by laparoscopy filshie clips and modified minilaparotomy pomeroy technique
publisher	Babol University of Medical Sciences
publishDate	2000
url	https://doaj.org/article/ce9c2593914f4589977d6419f7b22387
work_keys_str_mv	AT ghseidialavi acomparativesurveyofligationofuterinetubesbylaparoscopyfilshieclipsandmodifiedminilaparotomypomeroytechnique AT nsaghafi acomparativesurveyofligationofuterinetubesbylaparoscopyfilshieclipsandmodifiedminilaparotomypomeroytechnique AT mpakdaman acomparativesurveyofligationofuterinetubesbylaparoscopyfilshieclipsandmodifiedminilaparotomypomeroytechnique AT ghseidialavi comparativesurveyofligationofuterinetubesbylaparoscopyfilshieclipsandmodifiedminilaparotomypomeroytechnique AT nsaghafi comparativesurveyofligationofuterinetubesbylaparoscopyfilshieclipsandmodifiedminilaparotomypomeroytechnique AT mpakdaman comparativesurveyofligationofuterinetubesbylaparoscopyfilshieclipsandmodifiedminilaparotomypomeroytechnique
_version_	1718440139517067264

A comparative survey of ligation of uterine tubes by laparoscopy Filshie Clips and Modified Minilaparotomy Pomeroy technique

Ejemplares similares