Publishing, Objectivity, and Prestige
Some journals reject up to 80-90 % of the received manuscripts as they claim in their information to authors. Here, I propose a piece of tongue-in-cheek Instructions for Authors that would reflect some unspoken policies behind such high rejection rates in some 'snobbish' journals.
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | Khaled Moustafa |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/ceb5778a3a2b4ff4b9744da05982ef58 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Aligning Objectives and Assessment in Responsible Conduct of Research Instruction
por: Alison L. Antes, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
How Undergraduate Science Students Use Learning Objectives to Study
por: Bethany Osueke, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
What’s Not Being Discussed, or Considered, in Science Publishing?
por: Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
Publicado: (2015) -
A Review of <italic toggle="yes">The Microbial Challenge</italic><source>The Microbial Challenge</source>;
<edition>2nd ed.</edition>;
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Krasner</surname>
<given-names>Robert I</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>; (
<year>2010</year>).
<publisher-name>Jones and Bartlett Publishers</publisher-name>,
<publisher-loc>Sudbury, MA</publisher-loc>.
<fpage>476</fpage> pages.
por: Michael R. Leonardo
Publicado: (2011) -
ASM Scientific Writing and Publishing Institute: Program Impacts and Future Expansion
por: Irene V. Hulede, et al.
Publicado: (2015)