Allografts for Skin Closure during In Utero Spina Bifida Repair in a Sheep Model

Objectives: Use of off-label tissue graft materials, such as acellular dermal matrix (ADM), for in utero repair of severe spina bifida (SB), where primary skin layer closure is not possible, is associated with poor neurological outcomes. The cryopreserved human umbilical cord (HUC) patch has regener...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lovepreet K. Mann, Jong Hak Won, Rajan Patel, Eric P. Bergh, Jeannine Garnett, Meenakshi B. Bhattacharjee, Ponnada A. Narayana, Ranu Jain, Stephen A. Fletcher, Dejian Lai, Ramesha Papanna
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cee9d62f98f54422a804eedc7e48d1b9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cee9d62f98f54422a804eedc7e48d1b9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cee9d62f98f54422a804eedc7e48d1b92021-11-11T17:33:59ZAllografts for Skin Closure during In Utero Spina Bifida Repair in a Sheep Model10.3390/jcm102149282077-0383https://doaj.org/article/cee9d62f98f54422a804eedc7e48d1b92021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/21/4928https://doaj.org/toc/2077-0383Objectives: Use of off-label tissue graft materials, such as acellular dermal matrix (ADM), for in utero repair of severe spina bifida (SB), where primary skin layer closure is not possible, is associated with poor neurological outcomes. The cryopreserved human umbilical cord (HUC) patch has regenerative, anti-inflammatory, and anti-scarring properties, and provides watertight SB repair. We tested the hypothesis that the HUC is a superior skin patch to ADM for reducing inflammation at the repair site and preserving spinal cord function. Methods: In timed-pregnant ewes with twins, on gestational day (GD) 75, spina bifida was created without a myelotomy (functional model). On GD 95, repair was performed using HUC vs. ADM patches (randomly assigned) by suturing them to the skin edges. Additionally, full thickness skin closure as a primary skin closure (PSC) served as a positive control. Delivery was performed on GD 140, followed by blinded to treatment neurological assessments of the lambs using the Texas Spinal Cord Injury Scale (TSCIS) for gait, proprioception, and nociception. Lambs without spina bifida were used as controls (CTL). Ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging of spines at the repair site were performed, followed by quantitative pathological assessments. Histological assessments (blinded) included Masson’s trichrome, and immunofluorescence for myeloperoxidase (MPO; neutrophils) and for reactive astrocytes (inflammation) by co-staining vimentin and GFAP. Results: The combined hind limbs’ TSCIS was significantly higher in the HUC group than in ADM and PSC groups, <i>p</i> = 0.007. Both ADM and PSC groups exhibited loss of proprioception and mild to moderate ataxia compared to controls. MRI showed increased pathological findings in the PSC group when compared to the HUC group, <i>p</i> = 0.045. Histologically, the meningeal layer was thickened (inflammation) by 2–3 fold in ADM and PSC groups when compared to HUC and CTL groups, <i>p</i> = 0.01. There was lower MPO positive cells in the HUC group than in the ADM group, <i>p</i> = 0.018. Posterior column astrocyte activation was increased in ADM and PSC lambs compared to HUC lambs, <i>p</i> = 0.03. Conclusion: The HUC as a skin patch for in utero spina bifida repair preserves spinal cord function by reducing underlying inflammation when compared to ADM.Lovepreet K. MannJong Hak WonRajan PatelEric P. BerghJeannine GarnettMeenakshi B. BhattacharjeePonnada A. NarayanaRanu JainStephen A. FletcherDejian LaiRamesha PapannaMDPI AGarticleumbilical cordregenerative healingsheep spina bifida repair modelinflammationastrocyte activationacellular dermal matrixMedicineRENJournal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 10, Iss 4928, p 4928 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic umbilical cord
regenerative healing
sheep spina bifida repair model
inflammation
astrocyte activation
acellular dermal matrix
Medicine
R
spellingShingle umbilical cord
regenerative healing
sheep spina bifida repair model
inflammation
astrocyte activation
acellular dermal matrix
Medicine
R
Lovepreet K. Mann
Jong Hak Won
Rajan Patel
Eric P. Bergh
Jeannine Garnett
Meenakshi B. Bhattacharjee
Ponnada A. Narayana
Ranu Jain
Stephen A. Fletcher
Dejian Lai
Ramesha Papanna
Allografts for Skin Closure during In Utero Spina Bifida Repair in a Sheep Model
description Objectives: Use of off-label tissue graft materials, such as acellular dermal matrix (ADM), for in utero repair of severe spina bifida (SB), where primary skin layer closure is not possible, is associated with poor neurological outcomes. The cryopreserved human umbilical cord (HUC) patch has regenerative, anti-inflammatory, and anti-scarring properties, and provides watertight SB repair. We tested the hypothesis that the HUC is a superior skin patch to ADM for reducing inflammation at the repair site and preserving spinal cord function. Methods: In timed-pregnant ewes with twins, on gestational day (GD) 75, spina bifida was created without a myelotomy (functional model). On GD 95, repair was performed using HUC vs. ADM patches (randomly assigned) by suturing them to the skin edges. Additionally, full thickness skin closure as a primary skin closure (PSC) served as a positive control. Delivery was performed on GD 140, followed by blinded to treatment neurological assessments of the lambs using the Texas Spinal Cord Injury Scale (TSCIS) for gait, proprioception, and nociception. Lambs without spina bifida were used as controls (CTL). Ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging of spines at the repair site were performed, followed by quantitative pathological assessments. Histological assessments (blinded) included Masson’s trichrome, and immunofluorescence for myeloperoxidase (MPO; neutrophils) and for reactive astrocytes (inflammation) by co-staining vimentin and GFAP. Results: The combined hind limbs’ TSCIS was significantly higher in the HUC group than in ADM and PSC groups, <i>p</i> = 0.007. Both ADM and PSC groups exhibited loss of proprioception and mild to moderate ataxia compared to controls. MRI showed increased pathological findings in the PSC group when compared to the HUC group, <i>p</i> = 0.045. Histologically, the meningeal layer was thickened (inflammation) by 2–3 fold in ADM and PSC groups when compared to HUC and CTL groups, <i>p</i> = 0.01. There was lower MPO positive cells in the HUC group than in the ADM group, <i>p</i> = 0.018. Posterior column astrocyte activation was increased in ADM and PSC lambs compared to HUC lambs, <i>p</i> = 0.03. Conclusion: The HUC as a skin patch for in utero spina bifida repair preserves spinal cord function by reducing underlying inflammation when compared to ADM.
format article
author Lovepreet K. Mann
Jong Hak Won
Rajan Patel
Eric P. Bergh
Jeannine Garnett
Meenakshi B. Bhattacharjee
Ponnada A. Narayana
Ranu Jain
Stephen A. Fletcher
Dejian Lai
Ramesha Papanna
author_facet Lovepreet K. Mann
Jong Hak Won
Rajan Patel
Eric P. Bergh
Jeannine Garnett
Meenakshi B. Bhattacharjee
Ponnada A. Narayana
Ranu Jain
Stephen A. Fletcher
Dejian Lai
Ramesha Papanna
author_sort Lovepreet K. Mann
title Allografts for Skin Closure during In Utero Spina Bifida Repair in a Sheep Model
title_short Allografts for Skin Closure during In Utero Spina Bifida Repair in a Sheep Model
title_full Allografts for Skin Closure during In Utero Spina Bifida Repair in a Sheep Model
title_fullStr Allografts for Skin Closure during In Utero Spina Bifida Repair in a Sheep Model
title_full_unstemmed Allografts for Skin Closure during In Utero Spina Bifida Repair in a Sheep Model
title_sort allografts for skin closure during in utero spina bifida repair in a sheep model
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/cee9d62f98f54422a804eedc7e48d1b9
work_keys_str_mv AT lovepreetkmann allograftsforskinclosureduringinuterospinabifidarepairinasheepmodel
AT jonghakwon allograftsforskinclosureduringinuterospinabifidarepairinasheepmodel
AT rajanpatel allograftsforskinclosureduringinuterospinabifidarepairinasheepmodel
AT ericpbergh allograftsforskinclosureduringinuterospinabifidarepairinasheepmodel
AT jeanninegarnett allograftsforskinclosureduringinuterospinabifidarepairinasheepmodel
AT meenakshibbhattacharjee allograftsforskinclosureduringinuterospinabifidarepairinasheepmodel
AT ponnadaanarayana allograftsforskinclosureduringinuterospinabifidarepairinasheepmodel
AT ranujain allograftsforskinclosureduringinuterospinabifidarepairinasheepmodel
AT stephenafletcher allograftsforskinclosureduringinuterospinabifidarepairinasheepmodel
AT dejianlai allograftsforskinclosureduringinuterospinabifidarepairinasheepmodel
AT rameshapapanna allograftsforskinclosureduringinuterospinabifidarepairinasheepmodel
_version_ 1718432088775983104