Animals in Islamic Tradition and Muslim Cultures

In his peculiarly self-abasing preface to Animals in Islamic Tradition and Muslim Cultures, Richard Foltz speculates that the audience for his book will probably consist of “non-Muslims who are sympathetic to Muslim culture and interested in learning more about what it has to offer in terms of anim...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mohamad Khan
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: International Institute of Islamic Thought 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cf10e6c333b944cabd5136629c1f89e4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cf10e6c333b944cabd5136629c1f89e4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cf10e6c333b944cabd5136629c1f89e42021-12-02T17:49:41ZAnimals in Islamic Tradition and Muslim Cultures10.35632/ajis.v24i2.15562690-37332690-3741https://doaj.org/article/cf10e6c333b944cabd5136629c1f89e42007-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/view/1556https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3733https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3741 In his peculiarly self-abasing preface to Animals in Islamic Tradition and Muslim Cultures, Richard Foltz speculates that the audience for his book will probably consist of “non-Muslims who are sympathetic to Muslim culture and interested in learning more about what it has to offer in terms of animal rights” (p. xii). This appears to be less of a prediction than a presupposition guiding the book. Appropriately, Animals in Islamic Tradition is a very broad outline of representations of non-human animals from the pre- Islamic era to the present in as many fields as a 192-page book can encompass. As a result, his study tends to be kaleidoscopic, treating each subject in a very general manner, hastily running through the basics and garnishing them with selected curiosities. For perhaps the same reason, the book is written in a very simple style, neither extremely engaging nor boringly obscure, and tends to provide summary rather than analysis. The issue of the non-human animal in Islam and in Islamicate cultures is not a single question, but rather a vast number of disparate questions that ultimately require detailed attention in themselves. Given the lack of attention hitherto received by each of these specific questions, any general survey such as Foltz’s must necessarily be tentative and exploratory. The book is divided into seven chapters that deal, respectively, with references to animals in the Qur’an and the hadith literature (chapter 1), animal-related injunctions in Islamic law (chapter 2), scientific and philosophical studies (chapter 3), literary and artistic representations (chapter 4), animal rights in the contemporary era (chapter 5), Islamic vegetarianism (chapter 6), and Muslim attitudes toward dogs (chapter 7). Each chapter is further divided into several subheadings, making the book something of a collection of wellcategorized articles rather than a tightly bound narrative building up to a central argument ... Mohamad KhanInternational Institute of Islamic ThoughtarticleIslamBP1-253ENAmerican Journal of Islam and Society, Vol 24, Iss 2 (2007)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Islam
BP1-253
spellingShingle Islam
BP1-253
Mohamad Khan
Animals in Islamic Tradition and Muslim Cultures
description In his peculiarly self-abasing preface to Animals in Islamic Tradition and Muslim Cultures, Richard Foltz speculates that the audience for his book will probably consist of “non-Muslims who are sympathetic to Muslim culture and interested in learning more about what it has to offer in terms of animal rights” (p. xii). This appears to be less of a prediction than a presupposition guiding the book. Appropriately, Animals in Islamic Tradition is a very broad outline of representations of non-human animals from the pre- Islamic era to the present in as many fields as a 192-page book can encompass. As a result, his study tends to be kaleidoscopic, treating each subject in a very general manner, hastily running through the basics and garnishing them with selected curiosities. For perhaps the same reason, the book is written in a very simple style, neither extremely engaging nor boringly obscure, and tends to provide summary rather than analysis. The issue of the non-human animal in Islam and in Islamicate cultures is not a single question, but rather a vast number of disparate questions that ultimately require detailed attention in themselves. Given the lack of attention hitherto received by each of these specific questions, any general survey such as Foltz’s must necessarily be tentative and exploratory. The book is divided into seven chapters that deal, respectively, with references to animals in the Qur’an and the hadith literature (chapter 1), animal-related injunctions in Islamic law (chapter 2), scientific and philosophical studies (chapter 3), literary and artistic representations (chapter 4), animal rights in the contemporary era (chapter 5), Islamic vegetarianism (chapter 6), and Muslim attitudes toward dogs (chapter 7). Each chapter is further divided into several subheadings, making the book something of a collection of wellcategorized articles rather than a tightly bound narrative building up to a central argument ...
format article
author Mohamad Khan
author_facet Mohamad Khan
author_sort Mohamad Khan
title Animals in Islamic Tradition and Muslim Cultures
title_short Animals in Islamic Tradition and Muslim Cultures
title_full Animals in Islamic Tradition and Muslim Cultures
title_fullStr Animals in Islamic Tradition and Muslim Cultures
title_full_unstemmed Animals in Islamic Tradition and Muslim Cultures
title_sort animals in islamic tradition and muslim cultures
publisher International Institute of Islamic Thought
publishDate 2007
url https://doaj.org/article/cf10e6c333b944cabd5136629c1f89e4
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamadkhan animalsinislamictraditionandmuslimcultures
_version_ 1718379375367290880