Do I-PASS for FAIR? Measuring the FAIR-ness of Research Organizations

Given the increased use of the FAIR acronym as adjective for other contexts than data or data sets, the Dutch National Coordination Point for Research Data Management initiated a Task Group to work out the concept of a FAIR research organization. The results of this Task Groups are a definition of a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: J. Ringersma, M. Miedema
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cf3ae15f08a74beeb24a202fbd31a8ab
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cf3ae15f08a74beeb24a202fbd31a8ab
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cf3ae15f08a74beeb24a202fbd31a8ab2021-11-08T08:06:15ZDo I-PASS for FAIR? Measuring the FAIR-ness of Research Organizations1683-147010.5334/dsj-2021-030https://doaj.org/article/cf3ae15f08a74beeb24a202fbd31a8ab2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://datascience.codata.org/articles/1361https://doaj.org/toc/1683-1470Given the increased use of the FAIR acronym as adjective for other contexts than data or data sets, the Dutch National Coordination Point for Research Data Management initiated a Task Group to work out the concept of a FAIR research organization. The results of this Task Groups are a definition of a FAIR enabling organization and a method to measure the FAIR-ness of a research organization (The Do-I-PASS for FAIR method). The method can also aid in developing FAIR-enabling Road Maps for individual research institutions and at a national level. This practice paper describes the development of the method and provides a couple of use cases for the application of the method in daily research data management practices in research organizations.J. RingersmaM. MiedemaUbiquity Pressarticlefairself-assesmentresearch supportdata stewarshipScience (General)Q1-390ENData Science Journal, Vol 20, Iss 1 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic fair
self-assesment
research support
data stewarship
Science (General)
Q1-390
spellingShingle fair
self-assesment
research support
data stewarship
Science (General)
Q1-390
J. Ringersma
M. Miedema
Do I-PASS for FAIR? Measuring the FAIR-ness of Research Organizations
description Given the increased use of the FAIR acronym as adjective for other contexts than data or data sets, the Dutch National Coordination Point for Research Data Management initiated a Task Group to work out the concept of a FAIR research organization. The results of this Task Groups are a definition of a FAIR enabling organization and a method to measure the FAIR-ness of a research organization (The Do-I-PASS for FAIR method). The method can also aid in developing FAIR-enabling Road Maps for individual research institutions and at a national level. This practice paper describes the development of the method and provides a couple of use cases for the application of the method in daily research data management practices in research organizations.
format article
author J. Ringersma
M. Miedema
author_facet J. Ringersma
M. Miedema
author_sort J. Ringersma
title Do I-PASS for FAIR? Measuring the FAIR-ness of Research Organizations
title_short Do I-PASS for FAIR? Measuring the FAIR-ness of Research Organizations
title_full Do I-PASS for FAIR? Measuring the FAIR-ness of Research Organizations
title_fullStr Do I-PASS for FAIR? Measuring the FAIR-ness of Research Organizations
title_full_unstemmed Do I-PASS for FAIR? Measuring the FAIR-ness of Research Organizations
title_sort do i-pass for fair? measuring the fair-ness of research organizations
publisher Ubiquity Press
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/cf3ae15f08a74beeb24a202fbd31a8ab
work_keys_str_mv AT jringersma doipassforfairmeasuringthefairnessofresearchorganizations
AT mmiedema doipassforfairmeasuringthefairnessofresearchorganizations
_version_ 1718442853375410176