La dissonance communicationnelle des « porteurs de l’alerte » climatique

This paper analyses french climatologists’ communication, about their committed in global warming controversies. It presents a part of outcomes of a socioepistemic analysis on global warming controversies. It lights discursive strategies of researchers, who adopt more or less expert and/or political...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Lionel Scotto d’Apollonia
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	FR
Publicado:	Éditions en environnement VertigO 2016
Materias:	controversy environment climate global warming climate change communication researcher Environmental sciences GE1-350
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/cf4b7eae405b457582da04e921eaae93
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:cf4b7eae405b457582da04e921eaae93
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:cf4b7eae405b457582da04e921eaae932021-12-02T09:59:19ZLa dissonance communicationnelle des « porteurs de l’alerte » climatique1492-844210.4000/vertigo.17733https://doaj.org/article/cf4b7eae405b457582da04e921eaae932016-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/17733https://doaj.org/toc/1492-8442This paper analyses french climatologists’ communication, about their committed in global warming controversies. It presents a part of outcomes of a socioepistemic analysis on global warming controversies. It lights discursive strategies of researchers, who adopt more or less expert and/or political posture depending on different forums. This paper is based on a specific non-reductionist epistemological framework built specifically for socioscientific controversies such as climate change, which mobilizing different sociological fields sometimes controversial. In a first part this paper provides an inventory of a few socio-historical trajectories of the main contentious issues in the scientific literature with peer-reviewing. The second part analyzes communication of researchers focusing on the concept of "uncertainty". The paper demonstrates that some climatologists’ discourses climate "alarm carriers" reveal a form of communicative dissonance reflecting a tension between their own ethics "belief" (the science) and the "responsibility" (talk the risk they perceive). In conclusion, this paper contributes to the debate in the case of environmental controversies about the evolution of relationship between sciences-society and discusses the heuristic perspective of science so called "post-normal".Lionel Scotto d’ApolloniaÉditions en environnement VertigOarticlecontroversyenvironmentclimateglobal warmingclimate changecommunication researcherEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350FRVertigO, Vol 16, Iss 2 (2016)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	FR
topic	controversy environment climate global warming climate change communication researcher Environmental sciences GE1-350
spellingShingle	controversy environment climate global warming climate change communication researcher Environmental sciences GE1-350 Lionel Scotto d’Apollonia La dissonance communicationnelle des « porteurs de l’alerte » climatique
description	This paper analyses french climatologists’ communication, about their committed in global warming controversies. It presents a part of outcomes of a socioepistemic analysis on global warming controversies. It lights discursive strategies of researchers, who adopt more or less expert and/or political posture depending on different forums. This paper is based on a specific non-reductionist epistemological framework built specifically for socioscientific controversies such as climate change, which mobilizing different sociological fields sometimes controversial. In a first part this paper provides an inventory of a few socio-historical trajectories of the main contentious issues in the scientific literature with peer-reviewing. The second part analyzes communication of researchers focusing on the concept of "uncertainty". The paper demonstrates that some climatologists’ discourses climate "alarm carriers" reveal a form of communicative dissonance reflecting a tension between their own ethics "belief" (the science) and the "responsibility" (talk the risk they perceive). In conclusion, this paper contributes to the debate in the case of environmental controversies about the evolution of relationship between sciences-society and discusses the heuristic perspective of science so called "post-normal".
format	article
author	Lionel Scotto d’Apollonia
author_facet	Lionel Scotto d’Apollonia
author_sort	Lionel Scotto d’Apollonia
title	La dissonance communicationnelle des « porteurs de l’alerte » climatique
title_short	La dissonance communicationnelle des « porteurs de l’alerte » climatique
title_full	La dissonance communicationnelle des « porteurs de l’alerte » climatique
title_fullStr	La dissonance communicationnelle des « porteurs de l’alerte » climatique
title_full_unstemmed	La dissonance communicationnelle des « porteurs de l’alerte » climatique
title_sort	la dissonance communicationnelle des « porteurs de l’alerte » climatique
publisher	Éditions en environnement VertigO
publishDate	2016
url	https://doaj.org/article/cf4b7eae405b457582da04e921eaae93
work_keys_str_mv	AT lionelscottodapollonia ladissonancecommunicationnelledesporteursdelalerteclimatique
_version_	1718397834390142976

La dissonance communicationnelle des « porteurs de l’alerte » climatique

Ejemplares similares