Eye irrigation as a first-line treatment and diagnostic method for emergency department patients who complain of ocular foreign bodies

Abstract This prospective study aimed at determine whether eye irrigation removes ocular foreign bodies (FBs) and whether ocular pain predicts FBs. Emergency department patients complaining of ocular FBs were enrolled. In the irrigation group (n = 52), pain was evaluated with a visual analog scale b...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hung-Da Chou, Kuan-Jen Chen, Eugene Yu-Chuan Kang, Jui-Yen Lin, Po-Han Yeh, Yen-Ting Chen, Chi-Tung Cheng, Chi-Chun Lai, Wei-Chi Wu, Yih-Shiou Hwang, Ching-Hsi Hsiao
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cf80a90b3cde4687a00dab51ea13f497
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cf80a90b3cde4687a00dab51ea13f497
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cf80a90b3cde4687a00dab51ea13f4972021-12-05T12:15:35ZEye irrigation as a first-line treatment and diagnostic method for emergency department patients who complain of ocular foreign bodies10.1038/s41598-021-02989-32045-2322https://doaj.org/article/cf80a90b3cde4687a00dab51ea13f4972021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02989-3https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract This prospective study aimed at determine whether eye irrigation removes ocular foreign bodies (FBs) and whether ocular pain predicts FBs. Emergency department patients complaining of ocular FBs were enrolled. In the irrigation group (n = 52), pain was evaluated with a visual analog scale before and after irrigation, and the presence of FBs was determined under a slit-lamp. In the nonirrigation group (n = 27), the evaluations were performed upon arrival. The corneal FB retention rate was found significantly lower in the irrigation (13/52, 25%) than in the nonirrigation groups (13/27, 48%; P = 0.04). After irrigation, those without FBs had more patients experiencing pain reduction (67%) compared to those with retained FBs (46%; P = 0.14) and had a greater magnitude of change in pain score (mean ± SD, − 2.6 ± 2.7 vs. − 0.7 ± 1.4; P = 0.02). An improvement in ocular pain score ≥ 5 points after irrigation predicted the absence of FBs with a negative predictive value of 100%. Eye irrigation significantly lowered corneal FB retention; if ocular pain decreased considerably, the probability of retained FBs was low, making irrigation-associated pain score reduction a feasible diagnostic method to exclude FB retention without needing specialized ophthalmic examinations.Hung-Da ChouKuan-Jen ChenEugene Yu-Chuan KangJui-Yen LinPo-Han YehYen-Ting ChenChi-Tung ChengChi-Chun LaiWei-Chi WuYih-Shiou HwangChing-Hsi HsiaoNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Hung-Da Chou
Kuan-Jen Chen
Eugene Yu-Chuan Kang
Jui-Yen Lin
Po-Han Yeh
Yen-Ting Chen
Chi-Tung Cheng
Chi-Chun Lai
Wei-Chi Wu
Yih-Shiou Hwang
Ching-Hsi Hsiao
Eye irrigation as a first-line treatment and diagnostic method for emergency department patients who complain of ocular foreign bodies
description Abstract This prospective study aimed at determine whether eye irrigation removes ocular foreign bodies (FBs) and whether ocular pain predicts FBs. Emergency department patients complaining of ocular FBs were enrolled. In the irrigation group (n = 52), pain was evaluated with a visual analog scale before and after irrigation, and the presence of FBs was determined under a slit-lamp. In the nonirrigation group (n = 27), the evaluations were performed upon arrival. The corneal FB retention rate was found significantly lower in the irrigation (13/52, 25%) than in the nonirrigation groups (13/27, 48%; P = 0.04). After irrigation, those without FBs had more patients experiencing pain reduction (67%) compared to those with retained FBs (46%; P = 0.14) and had a greater magnitude of change in pain score (mean ± SD, − 2.6 ± 2.7 vs. − 0.7 ± 1.4; P = 0.02). An improvement in ocular pain score ≥ 5 points after irrigation predicted the absence of FBs with a negative predictive value of 100%. Eye irrigation significantly lowered corneal FB retention; if ocular pain decreased considerably, the probability of retained FBs was low, making irrigation-associated pain score reduction a feasible diagnostic method to exclude FB retention without needing specialized ophthalmic examinations.
format article
author Hung-Da Chou
Kuan-Jen Chen
Eugene Yu-Chuan Kang
Jui-Yen Lin
Po-Han Yeh
Yen-Ting Chen
Chi-Tung Cheng
Chi-Chun Lai
Wei-Chi Wu
Yih-Shiou Hwang
Ching-Hsi Hsiao
author_facet Hung-Da Chou
Kuan-Jen Chen
Eugene Yu-Chuan Kang
Jui-Yen Lin
Po-Han Yeh
Yen-Ting Chen
Chi-Tung Cheng
Chi-Chun Lai
Wei-Chi Wu
Yih-Shiou Hwang
Ching-Hsi Hsiao
author_sort Hung-Da Chou
title Eye irrigation as a first-line treatment and diagnostic method for emergency department patients who complain of ocular foreign bodies
title_short Eye irrigation as a first-line treatment and diagnostic method for emergency department patients who complain of ocular foreign bodies
title_full Eye irrigation as a first-line treatment and diagnostic method for emergency department patients who complain of ocular foreign bodies
title_fullStr Eye irrigation as a first-line treatment and diagnostic method for emergency department patients who complain of ocular foreign bodies
title_full_unstemmed Eye irrigation as a first-line treatment and diagnostic method for emergency department patients who complain of ocular foreign bodies
title_sort eye irrigation as a first-line treatment and diagnostic method for emergency department patients who complain of ocular foreign bodies
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/cf80a90b3cde4687a00dab51ea13f497
work_keys_str_mv AT hungdachou eyeirrigationasafirstlinetreatmentanddiagnosticmethodforemergencydepartmentpatientswhocomplainofocularforeignbodies
AT kuanjenchen eyeirrigationasafirstlinetreatmentanddiagnosticmethodforemergencydepartmentpatientswhocomplainofocularforeignbodies
AT eugeneyuchuankang eyeirrigationasafirstlinetreatmentanddiagnosticmethodforemergencydepartmentpatientswhocomplainofocularforeignbodies
AT juiyenlin eyeirrigationasafirstlinetreatmentanddiagnosticmethodforemergencydepartmentpatientswhocomplainofocularforeignbodies
AT pohanyeh eyeirrigationasafirstlinetreatmentanddiagnosticmethodforemergencydepartmentpatientswhocomplainofocularforeignbodies
AT yentingchen eyeirrigationasafirstlinetreatmentanddiagnosticmethodforemergencydepartmentpatientswhocomplainofocularforeignbodies
AT chitungcheng eyeirrigationasafirstlinetreatmentanddiagnosticmethodforemergencydepartmentpatientswhocomplainofocularforeignbodies
AT chichunlai eyeirrigationasafirstlinetreatmentanddiagnosticmethodforemergencydepartmentpatientswhocomplainofocularforeignbodies
AT weichiwu eyeirrigationasafirstlinetreatmentanddiagnosticmethodforemergencydepartmentpatientswhocomplainofocularforeignbodies
AT yihshiouhwang eyeirrigationasafirstlinetreatmentanddiagnosticmethodforemergencydepartmentpatientswhocomplainofocularforeignbodies
AT chinghsihsiao eyeirrigationasafirstlinetreatmentanddiagnosticmethodforemergencydepartmentpatientswhocomplainofocularforeignbodies
_version_ 1718372104413380608