Comparison of trapping methods for use in surveys for potential Culicoides vectors of orbiviruses

Abstract Background Bluetongue virus (BTV) and epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus (EHDV) are orbiviruses that can cause fatal vector-borne diseases in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Trapping methods for collecting potential Culicoides vectors of orbiviruses were compared to optimize su...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michael Becker, Jeong-Seok Park, Glen Gentry, Claudia Husseneder, Lane Foil
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cf83a96a2d5d4167acc45947577486c2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cf83a96a2d5d4167acc45947577486c2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cf83a96a2d5d4167acc45947577486c22021-11-08T10:57:17ZComparison of trapping methods for use in surveys for potential Culicoides vectors of orbiviruses10.1186/s13071-021-05059-91756-3305https://doaj.org/article/cf83a96a2d5d4167acc45947577486c22021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-05059-9https://doaj.org/toc/1756-3305Abstract Background Bluetongue virus (BTV) and epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus (EHDV) are orbiviruses that can cause fatal vector-borne diseases in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Trapping methods for collecting potential Culicoides vectors of orbiviruses were compared to optimize surveillance studies. Methods The number of captured midges and the virus infection rates of midge pools were compared for dry ice-baited Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) traps with or without black light. The number of individual midges of different Culicoides species captured at different crepuscular and nocturnal periods using rotator traps also was determined. The number of species/specimens of Culicoides was measured using five different trap methods including three animal-baited methods, a CDC trap with black light, and a CDC trap with no light. Results In trial one, there was no significant difference (P = 0.37) in the proportion of BTV-infected flies caught in traps with light compared to traps without light. However, there was a significant difference (P = 0.026) for EHDV-infected flies, and 89% were captured in traps with light. In trial two, more specimens of C. debilipalpis were captured in the morning hours (06:00–08:00) than in the evening hours (18:00–20:00). For trial three, the animal-baited traps did not capture any species of Culicoides that were not captured in the CDC light traps. There was no significant difference (P = 0.22) in total specimens captured among all five trap types. Conclusions Specimens of Culicoides infected with BTV were not repelled by light traps in the first trial, while the majority of the specimens positive for EHDV were caught in traps with light. For the second trial, specimens of C. debilipalpis were most abundant during early morning hours, and thus spray applications of insecticides for control of that species may be more effective at sunrise rather than sunset. For objective three, no animal-baited trapping method collected different species of midges when compared to the CDC traps with light, which is unlike certain studies conducted in other geographical regions. Graphical abstractMichael BeckerJeong-Seok ParkGlen GentryClaudia HussenederLane FoilBMCarticleBluetongue virusCulicoidesEpizootic hemorrhagic disease virusWhite-tailed deerInfectious and parasitic diseasesRC109-216ENParasites & Vectors, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Bluetongue virus
Culicoides
Epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus
White-tailed deer
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
spellingShingle Bluetongue virus
Culicoides
Epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus
White-tailed deer
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Michael Becker
Jeong-Seok Park
Glen Gentry
Claudia Husseneder
Lane Foil
Comparison of trapping methods for use in surveys for potential Culicoides vectors of orbiviruses
description Abstract Background Bluetongue virus (BTV) and epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus (EHDV) are orbiviruses that can cause fatal vector-borne diseases in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Trapping methods for collecting potential Culicoides vectors of orbiviruses were compared to optimize surveillance studies. Methods The number of captured midges and the virus infection rates of midge pools were compared for dry ice-baited Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) traps with or without black light. The number of individual midges of different Culicoides species captured at different crepuscular and nocturnal periods using rotator traps also was determined. The number of species/specimens of Culicoides was measured using five different trap methods including three animal-baited methods, a CDC trap with black light, and a CDC trap with no light. Results In trial one, there was no significant difference (P = 0.37) in the proportion of BTV-infected flies caught in traps with light compared to traps without light. However, there was a significant difference (P = 0.026) for EHDV-infected flies, and 89% were captured in traps with light. In trial two, more specimens of C. debilipalpis were captured in the morning hours (06:00–08:00) than in the evening hours (18:00–20:00). For trial three, the animal-baited traps did not capture any species of Culicoides that were not captured in the CDC light traps. There was no significant difference (P = 0.22) in total specimens captured among all five trap types. Conclusions Specimens of Culicoides infected with BTV were not repelled by light traps in the first trial, while the majority of the specimens positive for EHDV were caught in traps with light. For the second trial, specimens of C. debilipalpis were most abundant during early morning hours, and thus spray applications of insecticides for control of that species may be more effective at sunrise rather than sunset. For objective three, no animal-baited trapping method collected different species of midges when compared to the CDC traps with light, which is unlike certain studies conducted in other geographical regions. Graphical abstract
format article
author Michael Becker
Jeong-Seok Park
Glen Gentry
Claudia Husseneder
Lane Foil
author_facet Michael Becker
Jeong-Seok Park
Glen Gentry
Claudia Husseneder
Lane Foil
author_sort Michael Becker
title Comparison of trapping methods for use in surveys for potential Culicoides vectors of orbiviruses
title_short Comparison of trapping methods for use in surveys for potential Culicoides vectors of orbiviruses
title_full Comparison of trapping methods for use in surveys for potential Culicoides vectors of orbiviruses
title_fullStr Comparison of trapping methods for use in surveys for potential Culicoides vectors of orbiviruses
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of trapping methods for use in surveys for potential Culicoides vectors of orbiviruses
title_sort comparison of trapping methods for use in surveys for potential culicoides vectors of orbiviruses
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/cf83a96a2d5d4167acc45947577486c2
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelbecker comparisonoftrappingmethodsforuseinsurveysforpotentialculicoidesvectorsoforbiviruses
AT jeongseokpark comparisonoftrappingmethodsforuseinsurveysforpotentialculicoidesvectorsoforbiviruses
AT glengentry comparisonoftrappingmethodsforuseinsurveysforpotentialculicoidesvectorsoforbiviruses
AT claudiahusseneder comparisonoftrappingmethodsforuseinsurveysforpotentialculicoidesvectorsoforbiviruses
AT lanefoil comparisonoftrappingmethodsforuseinsurveysforpotentialculicoidesvectorsoforbiviruses
_version_ 1718442471280607232