Comparison of trapping methods for use in surveys for potential Culicoides vectors of orbiviruses
Abstract Background Bluetongue virus (BTV) and epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus (EHDV) are orbiviruses that can cause fatal vector-borne diseases in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Trapping methods for collecting potential Culicoides vectors of orbiviruses were compared to optimize su...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
BMC
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/cf83a96a2d5d4167acc45947577486c2 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:cf83a96a2d5d4167acc45947577486c2 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:cf83a96a2d5d4167acc45947577486c22021-11-08T10:57:17ZComparison of trapping methods for use in surveys for potential Culicoides vectors of orbiviruses10.1186/s13071-021-05059-91756-3305https://doaj.org/article/cf83a96a2d5d4167acc45947577486c22021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-05059-9https://doaj.org/toc/1756-3305Abstract Background Bluetongue virus (BTV) and epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus (EHDV) are orbiviruses that can cause fatal vector-borne diseases in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Trapping methods for collecting potential Culicoides vectors of orbiviruses were compared to optimize surveillance studies. Methods The number of captured midges and the virus infection rates of midge pools were compared for dry ice-baited Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) traps with or without black light. The number of individual midges of different Culicoides species captured at different crepuscular and nocturnal periods using rotator traps also was determined. The number of species/specimens of Culicoides was measured using five different trap methods including three animal-baited methods, a CDC trap with black light, and a CDC trap with no light. Results In trial one, there was no significant difference (P = 0.37) in the proportion of BTV-infected flies caught in traps with light compared to traps without light. However, there was a significant difference (P = 0.026) for EHDV-infected flies, and 89% were captured in traps with light. In trial two, more specimens of C. debilipalpis were captured in the morning hours (06:00–08:00) than in the evening hours (18:00–20:00). For trial three, the animal-baited traps did not capture any species of Culicoides that were not captured in the CDC light traps. There was no significant difference (P = 0.22) in total specimens captured among all five trap types. Conclusions Specimens of Culicoides infected with BTV were not repelled by light traps in the first trial, while the majority of the specimens positive for EHDV were caught in traps with light. For the second trial, specimens of C. debilipalpis were most abundant during early morning hours, and thus spray applications of insecticides for control of that species may be more effective at sunrise rather than sunset. For objective three, no animal-baited trapping method collected different species of midges when compared to the CDC traps with light, which is unlike certain studies conducted in other geographical regions. Graphical abstractMichael BeckerJeong-Seok ParkGlen GentryClaudia HussenederLane FoilBMCarticleBluetongue virusCulicoidesEpizootic hemorrhagic disease virusWhite-tailed deerInfectious and parasitic diseasesRC109-216ENParasites & Vectors, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Bluetongue virus Culicoides Epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus White-tailed deer Infectious and parasitic diseases RC109-216 |
spellingShingle |
Bluetongue virus Culicoides Epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus White-tailed deer Infectious and parasitic diseases RC109-216 Michael Becker Jeong-Seok Park Glen Gentry Claudia Husseneder Lane Foil Comparison of trapping methods for use in surveys for potential Culicoides vectors of orbiviruses |
description |
Abstract Background Bluetongue virus (BTV) and epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus (EHDV) are orbiviruses that can cause fatal vector-borne diseases in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Trapping methods for collecting potential Culicoides vectors of orbiviruses were compared to optimize surveillance studies. Methods The number of captured midges and the virus infection rates of midge pools were compared for dry ice-baited Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) traps with or without black light. The number of individual midges of different Culicoides species captured at different crepuscular and nocturnal periods using rotator traps also was determined. The number of species/specimens of Culicoides was measured using five different trap methods including three animal-baited methods, a CDC trap with black light, and a CDC trap with no light. Results In trial one, there was no significant difference (P = 0.37) in the proportion of BTV-infected flies caught in traps with light compared to traps without light. However, there was a significant difference (P = 0.026) for EHDV-infected flies, and 89% were captured in traps with light. In trial two, more specimens of C. debilipalpis were captured in the morning hours (06:00–08:00) than in the evening hours (18:00–20:00). For trial three, the animal-baited traps did not capture any species of Culicoides that were not captured in the CDC light traps. There was no significant difference (P = 0.22) in total specimens captured among all five trap types. Conclusions Specimens of Culicoides infected with BTV were not repelled by light traps in the first trial, while the majority of the specimens positive for EHDV were caught in traps with light. For the second trial, specimens of C. debilipalpis were most abundant during early morning hours, and thus spray applications of insecticides for control of that species may be more effective at sunrise rather than sunset. For objective three, no animal-baited trapping method collected different species of midges when compared to the CDC traps with light, which is unlike certain studies conducted in other geographical regions. Graphical abstract |
format |
article |
author |
Michael Becker Jeong-Seok Park Glen Gentry Claudia Husseneder Lane Foil |
author_facet |
Michael Becker Jeong-Seok Park Glen Gentry Claudia Husseneder Lane Foil |
author_sort |
Michael Becker |
title |
Comparison of trapping methods for use in surveys for potential Culicoides vectors of orbiviruses |
title_short |
Comparison of trapping methods for use in surveys for potential Culicoides vectors of orbiviruses |
title_full |
Comparison of trapping methods for use in surveys for potential Culicoides vectors of orbiviruses |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of trapping methods for use in surveys for potential Culicoides vectors of orbiviruses |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of trapping methods for use in surveys for potential Culicoides vectors of orbiviruses |
title_sort |
comparison of trapping methods for use in surveys for potential culicoides vectors of orbiviruses |
publisher |
BMC |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/cf83a96a2d5d4167acc45947577486c2 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michaelbecker comparisonoftrappingmethodsforuseinsurveysforpotentialculicoidesvectorsoforbiviruses AT jeongseokpark comparisonoftrappingmethodsforuseinsurveysforpotentialculicoidesvectorsoforbiviruses AT glengentry comparisonoftrappingmethodsforuseinsurveysforpotentialculicoidesvectorsoforbiviruses AT claudiahusseneder comparisonoftrappingmethodsforuseinsurveysforpotentialculicoidesvectorsoforbiviruses AT lanefoil comparisonoftrappingmethodsforuseinsurveysforpotentialculicoidesvectorsoforbiviruses |
_version_ |
1718442471280607232 |