Concurrent Validity of the Adult Eating Behavior Questionnaire in a Canadian Sample

The current study aimed to test the factor structure of the Adult Eating Behavior Questionnaire (AEBQ), its construct validity against the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ-R18) and its associations with body mass index (BMI) in Canadian adults (n = 534, 76% female). Confirmatory factor analys...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tamara R. Cohen, Lisa Kakinami, Hugues Plourde, Claudia Hunot-Alexander, Rebecca J. Beeken
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cf890d7daab7429fa5bd3f471607b914
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cf890d7daab7429fa5bd3f471607b914
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cf890d7daab7429fa5bd3f471607b9142021-12-02T11:32:39ZConcurrent Validity of the Adult Eating Behavior Questionnaire in a Canadian Sample1664-107810.3389/fpsyg.2021.779041https://doaj.org/article/cf890d7daab7429fa5bd3f471607b9142021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.779041/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/1664-1078The current study aimed to test the factor structure of the Adult Eating Behavior Questionnaire (AEBQ), its construct validity against the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ-R18) and its associations with body mass index (BMI) in Canadian adults (n = 534, 76% female). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed that a seven-factor AEBQ model, with the Hunger subscale removed, had better fit statistics than the original eight-factor structure. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess the internal reliability of each subscale and resulted with α > 0.70 for all subscales except for Hunger (α = 0.68). Pearson’s correlations were used to inform the convergent and discriminant validation of AEBQ against the TFEQ-R18 and to examine the relationship between AEBQ and BMI. All AEBQ Food Approach subscales positively correlated with that of the TFEQ-R18 Emotional Eating and Uncontrolled Eating subscales. Similarly, BMI correlated positively with Food Approach subscales (except Hunger) and negatively with Food Avoidance subscales (except Food Fussiness). These results support the use of a seven-factor AEBQ for adults self-reporting eating behaviors, construct validity of the AEBQ against TFEB-R18, and provide further evidence for the association of these traits with BMI.Tamara R. CohenTamara R. CohenLisa KakinamiLisa KakinamiHugues PlourdeClaudia Hunot-AlexanderRebecca J. BeekenRebecca J. BeekenFrontiers Media S.A.articleeating behavioursappetitive traitsvalidationquestionnairepsychometricsadultPsychologyBF1-990ENFrontiers in Psychology, Vol 12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic eating behaviours
appetitive traits
validation
questionnaire
psychometrics
adult
Psychology
BF1-990
spellingShingle eating behaviours
appetitive traits
validation
questionnaire
psychometrics
adult
Psychology
BF1-990
Tamara R. Cohen
Tamara R. Cohen
Lisa Kakinami
Lisa Kakinami
Hugues Plourde
Claudia Hunot-Alexander
Rebecca J. Beeken
Rebecca J. Beeken
Concurrent Validity of the Adult Eating Behavior Questionnaire in a Canadian Sample
description The current study aimed to test the factor structure of the Adult Eating Behavior Questionnaire (AEBQ), its construct validity against the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ-R18) and its associations with body mass index (BMI) in Canadian adults (n = 534, 76% female). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed that a seven-factor AEBQ model, with the Hunger subscale removed, had better fit statistics than the original eight-factor structure. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess the internal reliability of each subscale and resulted with α > 0.70 for all subscales except for Hunger (α = 0.68). Pearson’s correlations were used to inform the convergent and discriminant validation of AEBQ against the TFEQ-R18 and to examine the relationship between AEBQ and BMI. All AEBQ Food Approach subscales positively correlated with that of the TFEQ-R18 Emotional Eating and Uncontrolled Eating subscales. Similarly, BMI correlated positively with Food Approach subscales (except Hunger) and negatively with Food Avoidance subscales (except Food Fussiness). These results support the use of a seven-factor AEBQ for adults self-reporting eating behaviors, construct validity of the AEBQ against TFEB-R18, and provide further evidence for the association of these traits with BMI.
format article
author Tamara R. Cohen
Tamara R. Cohen
Lisa Kakinami
Lisa Kakinami
Hugues Plourde
Claudia Hunot-Alexander
Rebecca J. Beeken
Rebecca J. Beeken
author_facet Tamara R. Cohen
Tamara R. Cohen
Lisa Kakinami
Lisa Kakinami
Hugues Plourde
Claudia Hunot-Alexander
Rebecca J. Beeken
Rebecca J. Beeken
author_sort Tamara R. Cohen
title Concurrent Validity of the Adult Eating Behavior Questionnaire in a Canadian Sample
title_short Concurrent Validity of the Adult Eating Behavior Questionnaire in a Canadian Sample
title_full Concurrent Validity of the Adult Eating Behavior Questionnaire in a Canadian Sample
title_fullStr Concurrent Validity of the Adult Eating Behavior Questionnaire in a Canadian Sample
title_full_unstemmed Concurrent Validity of the Adult Eating Behavior Questionnaire in a Canadian Sample
title_sort concurrent validity of the adult eating behavior questionnaire in a canadian sample
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/cf890d7daab7429fa5bd3f471607b914
work_keys_str_mv AT tamararcohen concurrentvalidityoftheadulteatingbehaviorquestionnaireinacanadiansample
AT tamararcohen concurrentvalidityoftheadulteatingbehaviorquestionnaireinacanadiansample
AT lisakakinami concurrentvalidityoftheadulteatingbehaviorquestionnaireinacanadiansample
AT lisakakinami concurrentvalidityoftheadulteatingbehaviorquestionnaireinacanadiansample
AT huguesplourde concurrentvalidityoftheadulteatingbehaviorquestionnaireinacanadiansample
AT claudiahunotalexander concurrentvalidityoftheadulteatingbehaviorquestionnaireinacanadiansample
AT rebeccajbeeken concurrentvalidityoftheadulteatingbehaviorquestionnaireinacanadiansample
AT rebeccajbeeken concurrentvalidityoftheadulteatingbehaviorquestionnaireinacanadiansample
_version_ 1718395847496957952