Please tick the appropriate box: Perspectives on patient reported experience

Patient experience surveys are increasingly used as a method for evaluating important aspects of quality of care and the results are used politically to support general decision-making. However, there have been limited attempts to summarize the newest and most essential knowledge on how to measure a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mette Sandager, Morten Freil, Janne Knudsen
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: The Beryl Institute 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cf9a60d24b634903bb9ccaef2bc2193c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cf9a60d24b634903bb9ccaef2bc2193c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cf9a60d24b634903bb9ccaef2bc2193c2021-11-15T04:21:38ZPlease tick the appropriate box: Perspectives on patient reported experience2372-0247https://doaj.org/article/cf9a60d24b634903bb9ccaef2bc2193c2016-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://pxjournal.org/journal/vol3/iss1/10https://doaj.org/toc/2372-0247Patient experience surveys are increasingly used as a method for evaluating important aspects of quality of care and the results are used politically to support general decision-making. However, there have been limited attempts to summarize the newest and most essential knowledge on how to measure and interpret patient experience data. This paper aims to summarize knowledge on the association between delivered care and patient reported experience and the factors influencing this association, and to outline a conceptual model illustrating the association. The method employed is integrative literature review. Quantitative and qualitative studies as well as theoretical and discussion papers that specifically related to the concept of patient evaluations were included. Identified literature was scoped. Thematic analysis was conducted and the results were used to synthesize a model by integrating identified factors. Expectations, patient characteristics, survey timing, loyalty to health professionals, backing up own choices and questionnaire and item design where identified as factors influencing the association between delivered care and patient reported experience. The developed model suggests that there should be a clear differentiation between patient’s experience and patient reported experience. The model derived from the literature underlines that the association between received care and patient reported experience is complex. Patient reported experience data should be interpreted with caution, as reported positive experiences might neither reflect high quality care nor satisfied patients.Mette SandagerMorten FreilJanne KnudsenThe Beryl Institutearticlepatient experiencepatient reported experiencemeasurementmodelMedicine (General)R5-920Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENPatient Experience Journal (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic patient experience
patient reported experience
measurement
model
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle patient experience
patient reported experience
measurement
model
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Mette Sandager
Morten Freil
Janne Knudsen
Please tick the appropriate box: Perspectives on patient reported experience
description Patient experience surveys are increasingly used as a method for evaluating important aspects of quality of care and the results are used politically to support general decision-making. However, there have been limited attempts to summarize the newest and most essential knowledge on how to measure and interpret patient experience data. This paper aims to summarize knowledge on the association between delivered care and patient reported experience and the factors influencing this association, and to outline a conceptual model illustrating the association. The method employed is integrative literature review. Quantitative and qualitative studies as well as theoretical and discussion papers that specifically related to the concept of patient evaluations were included. Identified literature was scoped. Thematic analysis was conducted and the results were used to synthesize a model by integrating identified factors. Expectations, patient characteristics, survey timing, loyalty to health professionals, backing up own choices and questionnaire and item design where identified as factors influencing the association between delivered care and patient reported experience. The developed model suggests that there should be a clear differentiation between patient’s experience and patient reported experience. The model derived from the literature underlines that the association between received care and patient reported experience is complex. Patient reported experience data should be interpreted with caution, as reported positive experiences might neither reflect high quality care nor satisfied patients.
format article
author Mette Sandager
Morten Freil
Janne Knudsen
author_facet Mette Sandager
Morten Freil
Janne Knudsen
author_sort Mette Sandager
title Please tick the appropriate box: Perspectives on patient reported experience
title_short Please tick the appropriate box: Perspectives on patient reported experience
title_full Please tick the appropriate box: Perspectives on patient reported experience
title_fullStr Please tick the appropriate box: Perspectives on patient reported experience
title_full_unstemmed Please tick the appropriate box: Perspectives on patient reported experience
title_sort please tick the appropriate box: perspectives on patient reported experience
publisher The Beryl Institute
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/cf9a60d24b634903bb9ccaef2bc2193c
work_keys_str_mv AT mettesandager pleaseticktheappropriateboxperspectivesonpatientreportedexperience
AT mortenfreil pleaseticktheappropriateboxperspectivesonpatientreportedexperience
AT janneknudsen pleaseticktheappropriateboxperspectivesonpatientreportedexperience
_version_ 1718428897034371072