Quantitative Assessment of Clinician Assistance During Dynamic Rehabilitation Using Force Sensitive Resistors

Background: Neuromodulation using epidural electrical stimulation (EES) has shown functional restoration in humans with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). EES during body weight supported treadmill training (BWSTT) enhanced stepping performance in clinical trial participants with paraplegia. Unfortun...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Margaux B. Linde, Andrew R. Thoreson, Cesar Lopez, Megan L. Gill, Daniel D. Veith, Rena F. Hale, Jonathan S. Calvert, Peter J. Grahn, Kalli J. Fautsch, Dimitry G. Sayenko, Kristin D. Zhao
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/cfba3fb2cf6146cbbc26f1ed238d446c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:cfba3fb2cf6146cbbc26f1ed238d446c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:cfba3fb2cf6146cbbc26f1ed238d446c2021-12-02T10:29:04ZQuantitative Assessment of Clinician Assistance During Dynamic Rehabilitation Using Force Sensitive Resistors2673-686110.3389/fresc.2021.757828https://doaj.org/article/cfba3fb2cf6146cbbc26f1ed238d446c2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fresc.2021.757828/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2673-6861Background: Neuromodulation using epidural electrical stimulation (EES) has shown functional restoration in humans with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). EES during body weight supported treadmill training (BWSTT) enhanced stepping performance in clinical trial participants with paraplegia. Unfortunately, tools are lacking in availability to quantify clinician assistance during BWSTT with and without EES. Force sensitive resistors (FSRs) have previously quantified clinician assistance during static standing; however, dynamic tasks have not been addressed.Objective: To determine the validity of FSRs in measurements of force and duration to quantify clinician assistance and participant progression during BWSTT with EES in participants with SCI.Design: A feasibility study to determine the effectiveness of EES to restore function in individuals with SCI.Methods: Two male participants with chronic SCI were enrolled in a pilot phase clinical trial. Following implantation of an EES system in the lumbosacral spinal cord, both participants underwent 12 months of BWSTT with EES. At monthly intervals, FSRs were positioned on participants' knees to quantity forces applied by clinicians to achieve appropriate mechanics of stepping during BWSTT. The FSRs were validated on the benchtop using a leg model instrumented with a multiaxial load cell as the gold standard. The outcomes included clinician-applied force duration measured by FSR sensors and changes in applied forces indicating progression over the course of rehabilitation.Results: The force sensitive resistors validation revealed a proportional bias in their output. Loading required for maximal assist training exceeded the active range of the FSRs but were capable of capturing changes in clinician assist levels. The FSRs were also temporally responsive which increased utility for accurately assessing training contact time. The FSRs readings were able to capture independent stance for both participants by study end. There was minimal to no applied force bilaterally for participant 1 and unilaterally for participant 2.Conclusions: Clinician assistance applied at the knees as measured through FSRs during dynamic rehabilitation and EES (both on and off) effectively detected point of contact and duration of forces; however, it lacks accuracy of magnitude assessment. The reduced contact time measured through FSRs related to increased stance duration, which objectively identified independence in stepping during EES-enabled BWSTT following SCI.Margaux B. LindeAndrew R. ThoresonAndrew R. ThoresonCesar LopezMegan L. GillDaniel D. VeithRena F. HaleJonathan S. CalvertPeter J. GrahnPeter J. GrahnKalli J. FautschDimitry G. SayenkoKristin D. ZhaoKristin D. ZhaoFrontiers Media S.A.articlespinal cord injuryparalysisneuromodulationforce sensitive resistorslocomotor trainingrehabilitationOther systems of medicineRZ201-999Medical technologyR855-855.5ENFrontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, Vol 2 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic spinal cord injury
paralysis
neuromodulation
force sensitive resistors
locomotor training
rehabilitation
Other systems of medicine
RZ201-999
Medical technology
R855-855.5
spellingShingle spinal cord injury
paralysis
neuromodulation
force sensitive resistors
locomotor training
rehabilitation
Other systems of medicine
RZ201-999
Medical technology
R855-855.5
Margaux B. Linde
Andrew R. Thoreson
Andrew R. Thoreson
Cesar Lopez
Megan L. Gill
Daniel D. Veith
Rena F. Hale
Jonathan S. Calvert
Peter J. Grahn
Peter J. Grahn
Kalli J. Fautsch
Dimitry G. Sayenko
Kristin D. Zhao
Kristin D. Zhao
Quantitative Assessment of Clinician Assistance During Dynamic Rehabilitation Using Force Sensitive Resistors
description Background: Neuromodulation using epidural electrical stimulation (EES) has shown functional restoration in humans with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). EES during body weight supported treadmill training (BWSTT) enhanced stepping performance in clinical trial participants with paraplegia. Unfortunately, tools are lacking in availability to quantify clinician assistance during BWSTT with and without EES. Force sensitive resistors (FSRs) have previously quantified clinician assistance during static standing; however, dynamic tasks have not been addressed.Objective: To determine the validity of FSRs in measurements of force and duration to quantify clinician assistance and participant progression during BWSTT with EES in participants with SCI.Design: A feasibility study to determine the effectiveness of EES to restore function in individuals with SCI.Methods: Two male participants with chronic SCI were enrolled in a pilot phase clinical trial. Following implantation of an EES system in the lumbosacral spinal cord, both participants underwent 12 months of BWSTT with EES. At monthly intervals, FSRs were positioned on participants' knees to quantity forces applied by clinicians to achieve appropriate mechanics of stepping during BWSTT. The FSRs were validated on the benchtop using a leg model instrumented with a multiaxial load cell as the gold standard. The outcomes included clinician-applied force duration measured by FSR sensors and changes in applied forces indicating progression over the course of rehabilitation.Results: The force sensitive resistors validation revealed a proportional bias in their output. Loading required for maximal assist training exceeded the active range of the FSRs but were capable of capturing changes in clinician assist levels. The FSRs were also temporally responsive which increased utility for accurately assessing training contact time. The FSRs readings were able to capture independent stance for both participants by study end. There was minimal to no applied force bilaterally for participant 1 and unilaterally for participant 2.Conclusions: Clinician assistance applied at the knees as measured through FSRs during dynamic rehabilitation and EES (both on and off) effectively detected point of contact and duration of forces; however, it lacks accuracy of magnitude assessment. The reduced contact time measured through FSRs related to increased stance duration, which objectively identified independence in stepping during EES-enabled BWSTT following SCI.
format article
author Margaux B. Linde
Andrew R. Thoreson
Andrew R. Thoreson
Cesar Lopez
Megan L. Gill
Daniel D. Veith
Rena F. Hale
Jonathan S. Calvert
Peter J. Grahn
Peter J. Grahn
Kalli J. Fautsch
Dimitry G. Sayenko
Kristin D. Zhao
Kristin D. Zhao
author_facet Margaux B. Linde
Andrew R. Thoreson
Andrew R. Thoreson
Cesar Lopez
Megan L. Gill
Daniel D. Veith
Rena F. Hale
Jonathan S. Calvert
Peter J. Grahn
Peter J. Grahn
Kalli J. Fautsch
Dimitry G. Sayenko
Kristin D. Zhao
Kristin D. Zhao
author_sort Margaux B. Linde
title Quantitative Assessment of Clinician Assistance During Dynamic Rehabilitation Using Force Sensitive Resistors
title_short Quantitative Assessment of Clinician Assistance During Dynamic Rehabilitation Using Force Sensitive Resistors
title_full Quantitative Assessment of Clinician Assistance During Dynamic Rehabilitation Using Force Sensitive Resistors
title_fullStr Quantitative Assessment of Clinician Assistance During Dynamic Rehabilitation Using Force Sensitive Resistors
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Assessment of Clinician Assistance During Dynamic Rehabilitation Using Force Sensitive Resistors
title_sort quantitative assessment of clinician assistance during dynamic rehabilitation using force sensitive resistors
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/cfba3fb2cf6146cbbc26f1ed238d446c
work_keys_str_mv AT margauxblinde quantitativeassessmentofclinicianassistanceduringdynamicrehabilitationusingforcesensitiveresistors
AT andrewrthoreson quantitativeassessmentofclinicianassistanceduringdynamicrehabilitationusingforcesensitiveresistors
AT andrewrthoreson quantitativeassessmentofclinicianassistanceduringdynamicrehabilitationusingforcesensitiveresistors
AT cesarlopez quantitativeassessmentofclinicianassistanceduringdynamicrehabilitationusingforcesensitiveresistors
AT meganlgill quantitativeassessmentofclinicianassistanceduringdynamicrehabilitationusingforcesensitiveresistors
AT danieldveith quantitativeassessmentofclinicianassistanceduringdynamicrehabilitationusingforcesensitiveresistors
AT renafhale quantitativeassessmentofclinicianassistanceduringdynamicrehabilitationusingforcesensitiveresistors
AT jonathanscalvert quantitativeassessmentofclinicianassistanceduringdynamicrehabilitationusingforcesensitiveresistors
AT peterjgrahn quantitativeassessmentofclinicianassistanceduringdynamicrehabilitationusingforcesensitiveresistors
AT peterjgrahn quantitativeassessmentofclinicianassistanceduringdynamicrehabilitationusingforcesensitiveresistors
AT kallijfautsch quantitativeassessmentofclinicianassistanceduringdynamicrehabilitationusingforcesensitiveresistors
AT dimitrygsayenko quantitativeassessmentofclinicianassistanceduringdynamicrehabilitationusingforcesensitiveresistors
AT kristindzhao quantitativeassessmentofclinicianassistanceduringdynamicrehabilitationusingforcesensitiveresistors
AT kristindzhao quantitativeassessmentofclinicianassistanceduringdynamicrehabilitationusingforcesensitiveresistors
_version_ 1718397204112080896