Inconsistent and incomplete retraction of published research: A cross-sectional study on Covid-19 retractions and recommendations to mitigate risks for research, policy and practice.
<h4>Background</h4>Retraction of published research can reduce the dissemination of incorrect or misleading information, but concerns have been raised about the clarity and rigor of the retraction process. Failure to clearly and consistently retract research has several risks, for exampl...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Geoff Frampton, Lois Woods, David Alexander Scott |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/d01a66b5c4e14c29af910600e6b3fa78 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Inconsistent and incomplete retraction of published research: A cross-sectional study on Covid-19 retractions and recommendations to mitigate risks for research, policy and practice
por: Geoff Frampton, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Retraction
por: Singhai R
Publicado: (2012) -
Retraction
por: Editorial
Publicado: (2021) -
Retraction
por: Gamarra LF, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
A cross-sectional study on perception of stigma by Chinese schizophrenia patients [Retraction]
por: Ren ZB, et al.
Publicado: (2015)