Get it while it's hot: a peak-first bias in self-generated choice order in rhesus macaques.

Animals typically must make a number of successive choices to achieve a goal: e.g., eating multiple food items before becoming satiated. However, it is unclear whether choosing the best first or saving the best for last represents the best choice strategy to maximize overall reward. Specifically, si...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanghoon Jung, Jerald D Kralik
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d0214ad1f9cf4aaa8a0349db2884b465
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d0214ad1f9cf4aaa8a0349db2884b465
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d0214ad1f9cf4aaa8a0349db2884b4652021-11-18T08:40:33ZGet it while it's hot: a peak-first bias in self-generated choice order in rhesus macaques.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0083814https://doaj.org/article/d0214ad1f9cf4aaa8a0349db2884b4652013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24376758/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Animals typically must make a number of successive choices to achieve a goal: e.g., eating multiple food items before becoming satiated. However, it is unclear whether choosing the best first or saving the best for last represents the best choice strategy to maximize overall reward. Specifically, since outcomes can be evaluated prospectively (with future rewards discounted and more immediate rewards preferred) or retrospectively (with prior rewards discounted and more recent rewards preferred), the conditions under which each are used remains unclear. On the one hand, humans and non-human animals clearly discount future reward, preferring immediate rewards to delayed ones, suggesting prospective evaluation; on the other hand, it has also been shown that a sequence that ends well, i.e., with the best event or item last, is often preferred, suggesting retrospective evaluation. Here we hypothesized that when individuals are allowed to build the sequence themselves they are more likely to evaluate each item individually and therefore build a sequence using prospective evaluation. We examined the relationship between self-generated choice order and preference in rhesus monkeys in two experiments in which the distinctiveness of options were relatively high and low, respectively. We observed a positive linear relationship between choice order and preference among highly distinct options, indicating that the rhesus monkeys chose their preferred food first: i.e., a peak-first order preference. Overall, choice order depended on the degree of relative preference among alternatives and a peak-first bias, providing evidence for prospective evaluation when choice order is self-generated.Kanghoon JungJerald D KralikPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 12, p e83814 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Kanghoon Jung
Jerald D Kralik
Get it while it's hot: a peak-first bias in self-generated choice order in rhesus macaques.
description Animals typically must make a number of successive choices to achieve a goal: e.g., eating multiple food items before becoming satiated. However, it is unclear whether choosing the best first or saving the best for last represents the best choice strategy to maximize overall reward. Specifically, since outcomes can be evaluated prospectively (with future rewards discounted and more immediate rewards preferred) or retrospectively (with prior rewards discounted and more recent rewards preferred), the conditions under which each are used remains unclear. On the one hand, humans and non-human animals clearly discount future reward, preferring immediate rewards to delayed ones, suggesting prospective evaluation; on the other hand, it has also been shown that a sequence that ends well, i.e., with the best event or item last, is often preferred, suggesting retrospective evaluation. Here we hypothesized that when individuals are allowed to build the sequence themselves they are more likely to evaluate each item individually and therefore build a sequence using prospective evaluation. We examined the relationship between self-generated choice order and preference in rhesus monkeys in two experiments in which the distinctiveness of options were relatively high and low, respectively. We observed a positive linear relationship between choice order and preference among highly distinct options, indicating that the rhesus monkeys chose their preferred food first: i.e., a peak-first order preference. Overall, choice order depended on the degree of relative preference among alternatives and a peak-first bias, providing evidence for prospective evaluation when choice order is self-generated.
format article
author Kanghoon Jung
Jerald D Kralik
author_facet Kanghoon Jung
Jerald D Kralik
author_sort Kanghoon Jung
title Get it while it's hot: a peak-first bias in self-generated choice order in rhesus macaques.
title_short Get it while it's hot: a peak-first bias in self-generated choice order in rhesus macaques.
title_full Get it while it's hot: a peak-first bias in self-generated choice order in rhesus macaques.
title_fullStr Get it while it's hot: a peak-first bias in self-generated choice order in rhesus macaques.
title_full_unstemmed Get it while it's hot: a peak-first bias in self-generated choice order in rhesus macaques.
title_sort get it while it's hot: a peak-first bias in self-generated choice order in rhesus macaques.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/d0214ad1f9cf4aaa8a0349db2884b465
work_keys_str_mv AT kanghoonjung getitwhileitshotapeakfirstbiasinselfgeneratedchoiceorderinrhesusmacaques
AT jeralddkralik getitwhileitshotapeakfirstbiasinselfgeneratedchoiceorderinrhesusmacaques
_version_ 1718421471034867712