Get it while it's hot: a peak-first bias in self-generated choice order in rhesus macaques.
Animals typically must make a number of successive choices to achieve a goal: e.g., eating multiple food items before becoming satiated. However, it is unclear whether choosing the best first or saving the best for last represents the best choice strategy to maximize overall reward. Specifically, si...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/d0214ad1f9cf4aaa8a0349db2884b465 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:d0214ad1f9cf4aaa8a0349db2884b465 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:d0214ad1f9cf4aaa8a0349db2884b4652021-11-18T08:40:33ZGet it while it's hot: a peak-first bias in self-generated choice order in rhesus macaques.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0083814https://doaj.org/article/d0214ad1f9cf4aaa8a0349db2884b4652013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24376758/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Animals typically must make a number of successive choices to achieve a goal: e.g., eating multiple food items before becoming satiated. However, it is unclear whether choosing the best first or saving the best for last represents the best choice strategy to maximize overall reward. Specifically, since outcomes can be evaluated prospectively (with future rewards discounted and more immediate rewards preferred) or retrospectively (with prior rewards discounted and more recent rewards preferred), the conditions under which each are used remains unclear. On the one hand, humans and non-human animals clearly discount future reward, preferring immediate rewards to delayed ones, suggesting prospective evaluation; on the other hand, it has also been shown that a sequence that ends well, i.e., with the best event or item last, is often preferred, suggesting retrospective evaluation. Here we hypothesized that when individuals are allowed to build the sequence themselves they are more likely to evaluate each item individually and therefore build a sequence using prospective evaluation. We examined the relationship between self-generated choice order and preference in rhesus monkeys in two experiments in which the distinctiveness of options were relatively high and low, respectively. We observed a positive linear relationship between choice order and preference among highly distinct options, indicating that the rhesus monkeys chose their preferred food first: i.e., a peak-first order preference. Overall, choice order depended on the degree of relative preference among alternatives and a peak-first bias, providing evidence for prospective evaluation when choice order is self-generated.Kanghoon JungJerald D KralikPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 12, p e83814 (2013) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Kanghoon Jung Jerald D Kralik Get it while it's hot: a peak-first bias in self-generated choice order in rhesus macaques. |
description |
Animals typically must make a number of successive choices to achieve a goal: e.g., eating multiple food items before becoming satiated. However, it is unclear whether choosing the best first or saving the best for last represents the best choice strategy to maximize overall reward. Specifically, since outcomes can be evaluated prospectively (with future rewards discounted and more immediate rewards preferred) or retrospectively (with prior rewards discounted and more recent rewards preferred), the conditions under which each are used remains unclear. On the one hand, humans and non-human animals clearly discount future reward, preferring immediate rewards to delayed ones, suggesting prospective evaluation; on the other hand, it has also been shown that a sequence that ends well, i.e., with the best event or item last, is often preferred, suggesting retrospective evaluation. Here we hypothesized that when individuals are allowed to build the sequence themselves they are more likely to evaluate each item individually and therefore build a sequence using prospective evaluation. We examined the relationship between self-generated choice order and preference in rhesus monkeys in two experiments in which the distinctiveness of options were relatively high and low, respectively. We observed a positive linear relationship between choice order and preference among highly distinct options, indicating that the rhesus monkeys chose their preferred food first: i.e., a peak-first order preference. Overall, choice order depended on the degree of relative preference among alternatives and a peak-first bias, providing evidence for prospective evaluation when choice order is self-generated. |
format |
article |
author |
Kanghoon Jung Jerald D Kralik |
author_facet |
Kanghoon Jung Jerald D Kralik |
author_sort |
Kanghoon Jung |
title |
Get it while it's hot: a peak-first bias in self-generated choice order in rhesus macaques. |
title_short |
Get it while it's hot: a peak-first bias in self-generated choice order in rhesus macaques. |
title_full |
Get it while it's hot: a peak-first bias in self-generated choice order in rhesus macaques. |
title_fullStr |
Get it while it's hot: a peak-first bias in self-generated choice order in rhesus macaques. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Get it while it's hot: a peak-first bias in self-generated choice order in rhesus macaques. |
title_sort |
get it while it's hot: a peak-first bias in self-generated choice order in rhesus macaques. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/d0214ad1f9cf4aaa8a0349db2884b465 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kanghoonjung getitwhileitshotapeakfirstbiasinselfgeneratedchoiceorderinrhesusmacaques AT jeralddkralik getitwhileitshotapeakfirstbiasinselfgeneratedchoiceorderinrhesusmacaques |
_version_ |
1718421471034867712 |