Effect of Different Tool Probe Profiles on Material Flow of Al–Mg–Cu Alloy Joined by Friction Stir Welding

Friction Stir Welding (FSW) was utilized to butt−join 2024–T4 aluminum alloy plates of 1.9 mm thickness, using tools with conical and tapered hexagonal probe profiles. The characteristic effects of FSW using tools with tapered hexagonal probe profiles include an increase in the heat input and a sign...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anton Naumov, Evgenii Rylkov, Pavel Polyakov, Fedor Isupov, Andrey Rudskoy, Jong-Ning Aoh, Anatoly Popovich, Oleg Panchenko
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
T
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d041d817fa7f4c23b4a8bbe0c388e8a0
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d041d817fa7f4c23b4a8bbe0c388e8a0
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d041d817fa7f4c23b4a8bbe0c388e8a02021-11-11T17:52:11ZEffect of Different Tool Probe Profiles on Material Flow of Al–Mg–Cu Alloy Joined by Friction Stir Welding10.3390/ma142162961996-1944https://doaj.org/article/d041d817fa7f4c23b4a8bbe0c388e8a02021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/21/6296https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1944Friction Stir Welding (FSW) was utilized to butt−join 2024–T4 aluminum alloy plates of 1.9 mm thickness, using tools with conical and tapered hexagonal probe profiles. The characteristic effects of FSW using tools with tapered hexagonal probe profiles include an increase in the heat input and a significant modification of material flow, which have a positive effect on the metallurgical characteristics and mechanical performance of the weld. The differences in mechanical properties were interpreted through macrostructural changes and mechanical properties of the welded joints, which were supported by numerical simulation results on temperature distribution and material flow. The material flow resulting from the tapered hexagonal probe was more complicated than that of the conical probe. If in the first case, the dynamic viscosity and strain rate are homogeneously distributed around the probe, but in the case of the tapered hexagonal probe tool, the zones with maximum values of strain rates and minimum values of dynamic viscosity are located along the six tapered edges of the probe.Anton NaumovEvgenii RylkovPavel PolyakovFedor IsupovAndrey RudskoyJong-Ning AohAnatoly PopovichOleg PanchenkoMDPI AGarticleAl–Mg–Cu alloyfriction stir welding (FSW)probe profilemicrostructure evolutionmechanical propertiesmaterial flowTechnologyTElectrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineeringTK1-9971Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040MicroscopyQH201-278.5Descriptive and experimental mechanicsQC120-168.85ENMaterials, Vol 14, Iss 6296, p 6296 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Al–Mg–Cu alloy
friction stir welding (FSW)
probe profile
microstructure evolution
mechanical properties
material flow
Technology
T
Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering
TK1-9971
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Microscopy
QH201-278.5
Descriptive and experimental mechanics
QC120-168.85
spellingShingle Al–Mg–Cu alloy
friction stir welding (FSW)
probe profile
microstructure evolution
mechanical properties
material flow
Technology
T
Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering
TK1-9971
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Microscopy
QH201-278.5
Descriptive and experimental mechanics
QC120-168.85
Anton Naumov
Evgenii Rylkov
Pavel Polyakov
Fedor Isupov
Andrey Rudskoy
Jong-Ning Aoh
Anatoly Popovich
Oleg Panchenko
Effect of Different Tool Probe Profiles on Material Flow of Al–Mg–Cu Alloy Joined by Friction Stir Welding
description Friction Stir Welding (FSW) was utilized to butt−join 2024–T4 aluminum alloy plates of 1.9 mm thickness, using tools with conical and tapered hexagonal probe profiles. The characteristic effects of FSW using tools with tapered hexagonal probe profiles include an increase in the heat input and a significant modification of material flow, which have a positive effect on the metallurgical characteristics and mechanical performance of the weld. The differences in mechanical properties were interpreted through macrostructural changes and mechanical properties of the welded joints, which were supported by numerical simulation results on temperature distribution and material flow. The material flow resulting from the tapered hexagonal probe was more complicated than that of the conical probe. If in the first case, the dynamic viscosity and strain rate are homogeneously distributed around the probe, but in the case of the tapered hexagonal probe tool, the zones with maximum values of strain rates and minimum values of dynamic viscosity are located along the six tapered edges of the probe.
format article
author Anton Naumov
Evgenii Rylkov
Pavel Polyakov
Fedor Isupov
Andrey Rudskoy
Jong-Ning Aoh
Anatoly Popovich
Oleg Panchenko
author_facet Anton Naumov
Evgenii Rylkov
Pavel Polyakov
Fedor Isupov
Andrey Rudskoy
Jong-Ning Aoh
Anatoly Popovich
Oleg Panchenko
author_sort Anton Naumov
title Effect of Different Tool Probe Profiles on Material Flow of Al–Mg–Cu Alloy Joined by Friction Stir Welding
title_short Effect of Different Tool Probe Profiles on Material Flow of Al–Mg–Cu Alloy Joined by Friction Stir Welding
title_full Effect of Different Tool Probe Profiles on Material Flow of Al–Mg–Cu Alloy Joined by Friction Stir Welding
title_fullStr Effect of Different Tool Probe Profiles on Material Flow of Al–Mg–Cu Alloy Joined by Friction Stir Welding
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Different Tool Probe Profiles on Material Flow of Al–Mg–Cu Alloy Joined by Friction Stir Welding
title_sort effect of different tool probe profiles on material flow of al–mg–cu alloy joined by friction stir welding
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/d041d817fa7f4c23b4a8bbe0c388e8a0
work_keys_str_mv AT antonnaumov effectofdifferenttoolprobeprofilesonmaterialflowofalmgcualloyjoinedbyfrictionstirwelding
AT evgeniirylkov effectofdifferenttoolprobeprofilesonmaterialflowofalmgcualloyjoinedbyfrictionstirwelding
AT pavelpolyakov effectofdifferenttoolprobeprofilesonmaterialflowofalmgcualloyjoinedbyfrictionstirwelding
AT fedorisupov effectofdifferenttoolprobeprofilesonmaterialflowofalmgcualloyjoinedbyfrictionstirwelding
AT andreyrudskoy effectofdifferenttoolprobeprofilesonmaterialflowofalmgcualloyjoinedbyfrictionstirwelding
AT jongningaoh effectofdifferenttoolprobeprofilesonmaterialflowofalmgcualloyjoinedbyfrictionstirwelding
AT anatolypopovich effectofdifferenttoolprobeprofilesonmaterialflowofalmgcualloyjoinedbyfrictionstirwelding
AT olegpanchenko effectofdifferenttoolprobeprofilesonmaterialflowofalmgcualloyjoinedbyfrictionstirwelding
_version_ 1718432026927824896