Field effectiveness of pandemic and 2009-2010 seasonal vaccines against 2009-2010 A(H1N1) influenza: estimations from surveillance data in France.
<h4>Background</h4>In this study, we assess how effective pandemic and trivalent 2009-2010 seasonal vaccines were in preventing influenza-like illness (ILI) during the 2009 A(H1N1) pandemic in France. We also compare vaccine effectiveness against ILI versus laboratory-confirmed pandemic...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2011
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/d05cada74eb744b3863fdbf208c6e28f |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:d05cada74eb744b3863fdbf208c6e28f |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:d05cada74eb744b3863fdbf208c6e28f2021-11-18T06:54:11ZField effectiveness of pandemic and 2009-2010 seasonal vaccines against 2009-2010 A(H1N1) influenza: estimations from surveillance data in France.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0019621https://doaj.org/article/d05cada74eb744b3863fdbf208c6e28f2011-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21573005/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>In this study, we assess how effective pandemic and trivalent 2009-2010 seasonal vaccines were in preventing influenza-like illness (ILI) during the 2009 A(H1N1) pandemic in France. We also compare vaccine effectiveness against ILI versus laboratory-confirmed pandemic A(H1N1) influenza, and assess the possible bias caused by using non-specific endpoints and observational data.<h4>Methodology and principal findings</h4>We estimated vaccine effectiveness by using the following formula: VE = (PPV-PCV)/(PPV(1-PCV)) × 100%, where PPV is the proportion vaccinated in the population and PCV the proportion of vaccinated influenza cases. People were considered vaccinated three weeks after receiving a dose of vaccine. ILI and pandemic A(H1N1) laboratory-confirmed cases were obtained from two surveillance networks of general practitioners. During the epidemic, 99.7% of influenza isolates were pandemic A(H1N1). Pandemic and seasonal vaccine uptakes in the population were obtained from the National Health Insurance database and by telephonic surveys, respectively. Effectiveness estimates were adjusted by age and week. The presence of residual biases was explored by calculating vaccine effectiveness after the influenza period. The effectiveness of pandemic vaccines in preventing ILI was 52% (95% confidence interval: 30-69) during the pandemic and 33% (4-55) after. It was 86% (56-98) against confirmed influenza. The effectiveness of seasonal vaccines against ILI was 61% (56-66) during the pandemic and 19% (-10-41) after. It was 60% (41-74) against confirmed influenza.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The effectiveness of pandemic vaccines in preventing confirmed pandemic A(H1N1) influenza on the field was high, consistently with published findings. It was significantly lower against ILI. This is unsurprising since not all ILI cases are caused by influenza. Trivalent 2009-2010 seasonal vaccines had a statistically significant effectiveness in preventing ILI and confirmed pandemic influenza, but were not better in preventing confirmed pandemic influenza than in preventing ILI. This lack of difference might be indicative of selection bias.Camille PelatAlessandra FalchiFabrice CarratAnne MosnierIsabelle BonmarinClément TurbelinSophie VauxSylvie van der WerfJean Marie CohenBruno LinaThierry BlanchonThomas HanslikPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 6, Iss 5, p e19621 (2011) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
| spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Camille Pelat Alessandra Falchi Fabrice Carrat Anne Mosnier Isabelle Bonmarin Clément Turbelin Sophie Vaux Sylvie van der Werf Jean Marie Cohen Bruno Lina Thierry Blanchon Thomas Hanslik Field effectiveness of pandemic and 2009-2010 seasonal vaccines against 2009-2010 A(H1N1) influenza: estimations from surveillance data in France. |
| description |
<h4>Background</h4>In this study, we assess how effective pandemic and trivalent 2009-2010 seasonal vaccines were in preventing influenza-like illness (ILI) during the 2009 A(H1N1) pandemic in France. We also compare vaccine effectiveness against ILI versus laboratory-confirmed pandemic A(H1N1) influenza, and assess the possible bias caused by using non-specific endpoints and observational data.<h4>Methodology and principal findings</h4>We estimated vaccine effectiveness by using the following formula: VE = (PPV-PCV)/(PPV(1-PCV)) × 100%, where PPV is the proportion vaccinated in the population and PCV the proportion of vaccinated influenza cases. People were considered vaccinated three weeks after receiving a dose of vaccine. ILI and pandemic A(H1N1) laboratory-confirmed cases were obtained from two surveillance networks of general practitioners. During the epidemic, 99.7% of influenza isolates were pandemic A(H1N1). Pandemic and seasonal vaccine uptakes in the population were obtained from the National Health Insurance database and by telephonic surveys, respectively. Effectiveness estimates were adjusted by age and week. The presence of residual biases was explored by calculating vaccine effectiveness after the influenza period. The effectiveness of pandemic vaccines in preventing ILI was 52% (95% confidence interval: 30-69) during the pandemic and 33% (4-55) after. It was 86% (56-98) against confirmed influenza. The effectiveness of seasonal vaccines against ILI was 61% (56-66) during the pandemic and 19% (-10-41) after. It was 60% (41-74) against confirmed influenza.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The effectiveness of pandemic vaccines in preventing confirmed pandemic A(H1N1) influenza on the field was high, consistently with published findings. It was significantly lower against ILI. This is unsurprising since not all ILI cases are caused by influenza. Trivalent 2009-2010 seasonal vaccines had a statistically significant effectiveness in preventing ILI and confirmed pandemic influenza, but were not better in preventing confirmed pandemic influenza than in preventing ILI. This lack of difference might be indicative of selection bias. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Camille Pelat Alessandra Falchi Fabrice Carrat Anne Mosnier Isabelle Bonmarin Clément Turbelin Sophie Vaux Sylvie van der Werf Jean Marie Cohen Bruno Lina Thierry Blanchon Thomas Hanslik |
| author_facet |
Camille Pelat Alessandra Falchi Fabrice Carrat Anne Mosnier Isabelle Bonmarin Clément Turbelin Sophie Vaux Sylvie van der Werf Jean Marie Cohen Bruno Lina Thierry Blanchon Thomas Hanslik |
| author_sort |
Camille Pelat |
| title |
Field effectiveness of pandemic and 2009-2010 seasonal vaccines against 2009-2010 A(H1N1) influenza: estimations from surveillance data in France. |
| title_short |
Field effectiveness of pandemic and 2009-2010 seasonal vaccines against 2009-2010 A(H1N1) influenza: estimations from surveillance data in France. |
| title_full |
Field effectiveness of pandemic and 2009-2010 seasonal vaccines against 2009-2010 A(H1N1) influenza: estimations from surveillance data in France. |
| title_fullStr |
Field effectiveness of pandemic and 2009-2010 seasonal vaccines against 2009-2010 A(H1N1) influenza: estimations from surveillance data in France. |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Field effectiveness of pandemic and 2009-2010 seasonal vaccines against 2009-2010 A(H1N1) influenza: estimations from surveillance data in France. |
| title_sort |
field effectiveness of pandemic and 2009-2010 seasonal vaccines against 2009-2010 a(h1n1) influenza: estimations from surveillance data in france. |
| publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| publishDate |
2011 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/d05cada74eb744b3863fdbf208c6e28f |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT camillepelat fieldeffectivenessofpandemicand20092010seasonalvaccinesagainst20092010ah1n1influenzaestimationsfromsurveillancedatainfrance AT alessandrafalchi fieldeffectivenessofpandemicand20092010seasonalvaccinesagainst20092010ah1n1influenzaestimationsfromsurveillancedatainfrance AT fabricecarrat fieldeffectivenessofpandemicand20092010seasonalvaccinesagainst20092010ah1n1influenzaestimationsfromsurveillancedatainfrance AT annemosnier fieldeffectivenessofpandemicand20092010seasonalvaccinesagainst20092010ah1n1influenzaestimationsfromsurveillancedatainfrance AT isabellebonmarin fieldeffectivenessofpandemicand20092010seasonalvaccinesagainst20092010ah1n1influenzaestimationsfromsurveillancedatainfrance AT clementturbelin fieldeffectivenessofpandemicand20092010seasonalvaccinesagainst20092010ah1n1influenzaestimationsfromsurveillancedatainfrance AT sophievaux fieldeffectivenessofpandemicand20092010seasonalvaccinesagainst20092010ah1n1influenzaestimationsfromsurveillancedatainfrance AT sylvievanderwerf fieldeffectivenessofpandemicand20092010seasonalvaccinesagainst20092010ah1n1influenzaestimationsfromsurveillancedatainfrance AT jeanmariecohen fieldeffectivenessofpandemicand20092010seasonalvaccinesagainst20092010ah1n1influenzaestimationsfromsurveillancedatainfrance AT brunolina fieldeffectivenessofpandemicand20092010seasonalvaccinesagainst20092010ah1n1influenzaestimationsfromsurveillancedatainfrance AT thierryblanchon fieldeffectivenessofpandemicand20092010seasonalvaccinesagainst20092010ah1n1influenzaestimationsfromsurveillancedatainfrance AT thomashanslik fieldeffectivenessofpandemicand20092010seasonalvaccinesagainst20092010ah1n1influenzaestimationsfromsurveillancedatainfrance |
| _version_ |
1718424258358542336 |