Traditional and modified tunnel technique for the treatment of maxillary anterior teeth gingival recession

Objective To compare the clinical effect of the tunnel technique (TUN) and vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA) combining connective tissue grafts (CTGs) on recovering the exposed root surface in a case of gingival recession over the upper anterior teeth and then to provide clinic...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LIAO Yangyang, XIE Chengjie
Formato: article
Lenguaje:ZH
Publicado: Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases 2022
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d09698566a63455cb354eeda1335e635
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d09698566a63455cb354eeda1335e635
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d09698566a63455cb354eeda1335e6352021-11-23T07:21:16ZTraditional and modified tunnel technique for the treatment of maxillary anterior teeth gingival recession10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2022.01.0102096-1456https://doaj.org/article/d09698566a63455cb354eeda1335e6352022-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.kqjbfz.com/CN/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2022.01.010https://doaj.org/toc/2096-1456Objective To compare the clinical effect of the tunnel technique (TUN) and vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA) combining connective tissue grafts (CTGs) on recovering the exposed root surface in a case of gingival recession over the upper anterior teeth and then to provide clinical evidence for gingival recession treatment. Methods A case of gingival recession (Miller I type) over teeth 13-14 and 22-23 was treated using different techniques bilaterally. 22-23 were treated by a TUN combined CTG transplantation,while teeth 13-14 were treated by a VISTA technique combined with CTG transplantation. The gingival retraction height (GRH), gingival retraction width (GRW), keratinized gingival width (KW), root coverage aesthetic score (RES) and visual analog scale (VAS) were measured after operation. Results The effect of post-operation were ideal and complete ginglval recovering were achieved, the postoperative effects of the two methods were stable, GRH and GRW decreased, and KW increased. RES was 10. The VAS score of VISTA combined with CTG transplantation was 6, which was higher than that of TUN+CTG. Conclusion Gingival recession can be treated by TUN+CTG or VISTA+CTG with ideal prognosis. VISTA with an additional incision facilitates the operative procedure but leads to less comfort.LIAO YangyangXIE ChengjieEditorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseasesarticletunnel techniquevestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel accessgingival recessionroot surface coverageconnective tissue graftroot coverage esthetic scoregingival recession heightgingival recession widthkeratinized tissueMedicineRZH口腔疾病防治, Vol 30, Iss 1, Pp 57-62 (2022)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language ZH
topic tunnel technique
vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access
gingival recession
root surface coverage
connective tissue graft
root coverage esthetic score
gingival recession height
gingival recession width
keratinized tissue
Medicine
R
spellingShingle tunnel technique
vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access
gingival recession
root surface coverage
connective tissue graft
root coverage esthetic score
gingival recession height
gingival recession width
keratinized tissue
Medicine
R
LIAO Yangyang
XIE Chengjie
Traditional and modified tunnel technique for the treatment of maxillary anterior teeth gingival recession
description Objective To compare the clinical effect of the tunnel technique (TUN) and vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA) combining connective tissue grafts (CTGs) on recovering the exposed root surface in a case of gingival recession over the upper anterior teeth and then to provide clinical evidence for gingival recession treatment. Methods A case of gingival recession (Miller I type) over teeth 13-14 and 22-23 was treated using different techniques bilaterally. 22-23 were treated by a TUN combined CTG transplantation,while teeth 13-14 were treated by a VISTA technique combined with CTG transplantation. The gingival retraction height (GRH), gingival retraction width (GRW), keratinized gingival width (KW), root coverage aesthetic score (RES) and visual analog scale (VAS) were measured after operation. Results The effect of post-operation were ideal and complete ginglval recovering were achieved, the postoperative effects of the two methods were stable, GRH and GRW decreased, and KW increased. RES was 10. The VAS score of VISTA combined with CTG transplantation was 6, which was higher than that of TUN+CTG. Conclusion Gingival recession can be treated by TUN+CTG or VISTA+CTG with ideal prognosis. VISTA with an additional incision facilitates the operative procedure but leads to less comfort.
format article
author LIAO Yangyang
XIE Chengjie
author_facet LIAO Yangyang
XIE Chengjie
author_sort LIAO Yangyang
title Traditional and modified tunnel technique for the treatment of maxillary anterior teeth gingival recession
title_short Traditional and modified tunnel technique for the treatment of maxillary anterior teeth gingival recession
title_full Traditional and modified tunnel technique for the treatment of maxillary anterior teeth gingival recession
title_fullStr Traditional and modified tunnel technique for the treatment of maxillary anterior teeth gingival recession
title_full_unstemmed Traditional and modified tunnel technique for the treatment of maxillary anterior teeth gingival recession
title_sort traditional and modified tunnel technique for the treatment of maxillary anterior teeth gingival recession
publisher Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases
publishDate 2022
url https://doaj.org/article/d09698566a63455cb354eeda1335e635
work_keys_str_mv AT liaoyangyang traditionalandmodifiedtunneltechniqueforthetreatmentofmaxillaryanteriorteethgingivalrecession
AT xiechengjie traditionalandmodifiedtunneltechniqueforthetreatmentofmaxillaryanteriorteethgingivalrecession
_version_ 1718416852306100224