Critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies: the CHARMS checklist.
Carl Moons and colleagues provide a checklist and background explanation for critically appraising and extracting data from systematic reviews of prognostic and diagnostic prediction modelling studies. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Karel G M Moons, Joris A H de Groot, Walter Bouwmeester, Yvonne Vergouwe, Susan Mallett, Douglas G Altman, Johannes B Reitsma, Gary S Collins |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Language: | EN |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/d0b08d9766d84137ba376480ba2503d0 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Reporting and methods in clinical prediction research: a systematic review.
by: Walter Bouwmeester, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Efficacy of indigenous charms as weapons of war
by: David Bilungule Bakamana, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Probing the gluon plasma with charm balance functions
by: Sumit Basu, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Features of Written Existence of Charm Tradition in Ulyanovsk Volga Region
by: A. E. Kalashnikova
Published: (2019) -
Appraising clinical applicability of studies: mapping and synthesis of current frameworks, and proposal of the FrACAS framework and VICORT checklist
by: Quoc Dinh Nguyen, et al.
Published: (2021)