Écologie et fiscalité : convergence des luttes ?

The 2014 Finance Bill (FDP 2014) introduced a carbon component into the Internal Tax on Consumption of Energy Products (TICPE) – also known as the climate energy contribution or carbon tax. The inclusion of this measure in the 2014 FDP is the responsibility of the government, which formally relies o...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Marianne Ollivier-Trigalo
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	FR
Publicado:	Éditions en environnement VertigO 2019
Materias:	ecological taxation carbon tax diesel/gasoline tax differentials TICPE energy policy climate policy Environmental sciences GE1-350
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/d0d413593ee14aadbaf17b04d54dbb3f
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:d0d413593ee14aadbaf17b04d54dbb3f
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:d0d413593ee14aadbaf17b04d54dbb3f2021-12-02T10:01:49ZÉcologie et fiscalité : convergence des luttes ?1492-844210.4000/vertigo.25651https://doaj.org/article/d0d413593ee14aadbaf17b04d54dbb3f2019-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/25651https://doaj.org/toc/1492-8442The 2014 Finance Bill (FDP 2014) introduced a carbon component into the Internal Tax on Consumption of Energy Products (TICPE) – also known as the climate energy contribution or carbon tax. The inclusion of this measure in the 2014 FDP is the responsibility of the government, which formally relies on the work of a Committee for Ecological Taxation (CFE), which we examined in order to understand under what conditions the introduction of the carbon base in TICPE was developed. On this empirical basis (numerous writings by the CFE and interviews with members of the committee), the purpose of this article is to highlight an interdependence between taxation and energy policy that the outcome of this work shows, reflected in the vote on the TICPE reform. Our analysis highlights how CFE members have had to deal with the rules and formats imposed by taxation. These tax rules are reflected in the choice to go through TICPE, which responds to a double injunction : on the one hand, the efficiency injunction – a tax is above all a revenue ; and on the other hand, the injunction not to create a new tax. The choice to reform TICPE has several characteristics that have a public policy meaning. The mobilisation of a tax instrument has led to the use of tax switching arguments – a tax transition. At the same time, focusing on fossil fuel consumption by introducing the consideration of CO2 emissions (including fuels) has led to exchanges on the search for energy efficiency – an energy transition. Of course, reality does not choose but, on the contrary, mixes the two orientations, making them interdependent.Marianne Ollivier-TrigaloÉditions en environnement VertigOarticleecological taxationcarbon taxdiesel/gasoline tax differentialsTICPEenergy policyclimate policyEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350FRVertigO, Vol 19, Iss 2 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	FR
topic	ecological taxation carbon tax diesel/gasoline tax differentials TICPE energy policy climate policy Environmental sciences GE1-350
spellingShingle	ecological taxation carbon tax diesel/gasoline tax differentials TICPE energy policy climate policy Environmental sciences GE1-350 Marianne Ollivier-Trigalo Écologie et fiscalité : convergence des luttes ?
description	The 2014 Finance Bill (FDP 2014) introduced a carbon component into the Internal Tax on Consumption of Energy Products (TICPE) – also known as the climate energy contribution or carbon tax. The inclusion of this measure in the 2014 FDP is the responsibility of the government, which formally relies on the work of a Committee for Ecological Taxation (CFE), which we examined in order to understand under what conditions the introduction of the carbon base in TICPE was developed. On this empirical basis (numerous writings by the CFE and interviews with members of the committee), the purpose of this article is to highlight an interdependence between taxation and energy policy that the outcome of this work shows, reflected in the vote on the TICPE reform. Our analysis highlights how CFE members have had to deal with the rules and formats imposed by taxation. These tax rules are reflected in the choice to go through TICPE, which responds to a double injunction : on the one hand, the efficiency injunction – a tax is above all a revenue ; and on the other hand, the injunction not to create a new tax. The choice to reform TICPE has several characteristics that have a public policy meaning. The mobilisation of a tax instrument has led to the use of tax switching arguments – a tax transition. At the same time, focusing on fossil fuel consumption by introducing the consideration of CO2 emissions (including fuels) has led to exchanges on the search for energy efficiency – an energy transition. Of course, reality does not choose but, on the contrary, mixes the two orientations, making them interdependent.
format	article
author	Marianne Ollivier-Trigalo
author_facet	Marianne Ollivier-Trigalo
author_sort	Marianne Ollivier-Trigalo
title	Écologie et fiscalité : convergence des luttes ?
title_short	Écologie et fiscalité : convergence des luttes ?
title_full	Écologie et fiscalité : convergence des luttes ?
title_fullStr	Écologie et fiscalité : convergence des luttes ?
title_full_unstemmed	Écologie et fiscalité : convergence des luttes ?
title_sort	écologie et fiscalité : convergence des luttes ?
publisher	Éditions en environnement VertigO
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/d0d413593ee14aadbaf17b04d54dbb3f
work_keys_str_mv	AT marianneolliviertrigalo ecologieetfiscaliteconvergencedesluttes
_version_	1718397779132284928

Écologie et fiscalité : convergence des luttes ?

Ejemplares similares