Confirmatory Efficacy and Safety Trial of Magnetic Seizure Therapy for Depression (CREST-MST): study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority trial of magnetic seizure therapy versus electroconvulsive therapy

Abstract Background Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is well-established and effective for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), but in Canada and the USA, less than 1% of patients with TRD receive ECT mainly due to its cognitive adverse effects (i.e. amnesia). Thus, new treatment alternatives for TR...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zafiris J. Daskalakis, Carol Tamminga, Alanah Throop, Lucy Palmer, Julia Dimitrova, Faranak Farzan, Kevin E. Thorpe, Shawn M. McClintock, Daniel M. Blumberger
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d1003ca162e449d5884898943ebafd36
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d1003ca162e449d5884898943ebafd36
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d1003ca162e449d5884898943ebafd362021-11-14T12:31:24ZConfirmatory Efficacy and Safety Trial of Magnetic Seizure Therapy for Depression (CREST-MST): study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority trial of magnetic seizure therapy versus electroconvulsive therapy10.1186/s13063-021-05730-71745-6215https://doaj.org/article/d1003ca162e449d5884898943ebafd362021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05730-7https://doaj.org/toc/1745-6215Abstract Background Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is well-established and effective for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), but in Canada and the USA, less than 1% of patients with TRD receive ECT mainly due to its cognitive adverse effects (i.e. amnesia). Thus, new treatment alternatives for TRD are urgently needed. One such treatment is magnetic seizure therapy (MST). ECT involves applying a train of high-frequency electrical stimuli to induce a seizure, whereas MST involves applying a train of high-frequency magnetic stimuli to induce a seizure. Methods In this manuscript, we introduce our international, two-site, double-blinded, randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial to develop MST as an effective and safe treatment for TRD. This trial will compare the efficacy of MST to right unilateral ultra-brief pulse width electroconvulsive therapy (RUL-UB-ECT) with a combined primary endpoint of remission of depression and superior cognitive adverse effects in 260 patients with TRD. Amelioration of suicidal ideation will be assessed as a secondary endpoint. Inpatients or outpatients, over 18 years of age with a MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) diagnosis of non-psychotic major depressive disorder (MDD) can be enrolled in the study provided that they meet illness severity and full eligibility criteria. Participants are randomized to receive MST or RUL-UB ECT, 2-3 days per week over seven weeks, or a maximum of 21 treatments. The study will involve before-, during-, and after-treatment assessments of depression severity, suicidal ideation, subjective side-effects, and cognitive performance consistent with an intent-to-treat study design approach. Discussion Positive results from this trial could have an immediate and tremendous impact for patients with TRD. If MST demonstrates comparable antidepressant treatment efficacy to ECT, but with greater cognitive safety, it could rapidly be adopted into clinical practice. Indeed, given that the administration of MST is nearly identical to ECT, the majority of ECT facilities in North America could readily adopt MST. Furthermore, the potential for cognitive safety could lead to improved treatment acceptability. Healthcare providers, patients and care partners, and policymakers would therefore demand this form of convulsive therapy. Trial status Enrollment for this study began on June 26, 2018, and is estimated to complete recruitment by July 2024. At the time of submission, we have enrolled and randomized 117 participants. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03191058 , Registered on June 19, 2017. Primary sponsor: Daniel Blumberger (DMB), Principal Investigator Daniel.Blumberger@camh.ca , 416-535-8501 x 33662 Contact for public queries: DMB, Daniel.Blumberger@camh.ca Contact for scientific queries: ZJD, Zdaskalakis@health.ucsd.eduZafiris J. DaskalakisCarol TammingaAlanah ThroopLucy PalmerJulia DimitrovaFaranak FarzanKevin E. ThorpeShawn M. McClintockDaniel M. BlumbergerBMCarticleDepressionMajor depressive disorderTreatment-resistant depressionMagnetic seizure therapyElectroconvulsive therapyBrain stimulation, Randomized controlled trialMedicine (General)R5-920ENTrials, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-15 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Depression
Major depressive disorder
Treatment-resistant depression
Magnetic seizure therapy
Electroconvulsive therapy
Brain stimulation, Randomized controlled trial
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle Depression
Major depressive disorder
Treatment-resistant depression
Magnetic seizure therapy
Electroconvulsive therapy
Brain stimulation, Randomized controlled trial
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Zafiris J. Daskalakis
Carol Tamminga
Alanah Throop
Lucy Palmer
Julia Dimitrova
Faranak Farzan
Kevin E. Thorpe
Shawn M. McClintock
Daniel M. Blumberger
Confirmatory Efficacy and Safety Trial of Magnetic Seizure Therapy for Depression (CREST-MST): study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority trial of magnetic seizure therapy versus electroconvulsive therapy
description Abstract Background Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is well-established and effective for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), but in Canada and the USA, less than 1% of patients with TRD receive ECT mainly due to its cognitive adverse effects (i.e. amnesia). Thus, new treatment alternatives for TRD are urgently needed. One such treatment is magnetic seizure therapy (MST). ECT involves applying a train of high-frequency electrical stimuli to induce a seizure, whereas MST involves applying a train of high-frequency magnetic stimuli to induce a seizure. Methods In this manuscript, we introduce our international, two-site, double-blinded, randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial to develop MST as an effective and safe treatment for TRD. This trial will compare the efficacy of MST to right unilateral ultra-brief pulse width electroconvulsive therapy (RUL-UB-ECT) with a combined primary endpoint of remission of depression and superior cognitive adverse effects in 260 patients with TRD. Amelioration of suicidal ideation will be assessed as a secondary endpoint. Inpatients or outpatients, over 18 years of age with a MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) diagnosis of non-psychotic major depressive disorder (MDD) can be enrolled in the study provided that they meet illness severity and full eligibility criteria. Participants are randomized to receive MST or RUL-UB ECT, 2-3 days per week over seven weeks, or a maximum of 21 treatments. The study will involve before-, during-, and after-treatment assessments of depression severity, suicidal ideation, subjective side-effects, and cognitive performance consistent with an intent-to-treat study design approach. Discussion Positive results from this trial could have an immediate and tremendous impact for patients with TRD. If MST demonstrates comparable antidepressant treatment efficacy to ECT, but with greater cognitive safety, it could rapidly be adopted into clinical practice. Indeed, given that the administration of MST is nearly identical to ECT, the majority of ECT facilities in North America could readily adopt MST. Furthermore, the potential for cognitive safety could lead to improved treatment acceptability. Healthcare providers, patients and care partners, and policymakers would therefore demand this form of convulsive therapy. Trial status Enrollment for this study began on June 26, 2018, and is estimated to complete recruitment by July 2024. At the time of submission, we have enrolled and randomized 117 participants. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03191058 , Registered on June 19, 2017. Primary sponsor: Daniel Blumberger (DMB), Principal Investigator Daniel.Blumberger@camh.ca , 416-535-8501 x 33662 Contact for public queries: DMB, Daniel.Blumberger@camh.ca Contact for scientific queries: ZJD, Zdaskalakis@health.ucsd.edu
format article
author Zafiris J. Daskalakis
Carol Tamminga
Alanah Throop
Lucy Palmer
Julia Dimitrova
Faranak Farzan
Kevin E. Thorpe
Shawn M. McClintock
Daniel M. Blumberger
author_facet Zafiris J. Daskalakis
Carol Tamminga
Alanah Throop
Lucy Palmer
Julia Dimitrova
Faranak Farzan
Kevin E. Thorpe
Shawn M. McClintock
Daniel M. Blumberger
author_sort Zafiris J. Daskalakis
title Confirmatory Efficacy and Safety Trial of Magnetic Seizure Therapy for Depression (CREST-MST): study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority trial of magnetic seizure therapy versus electroconvulsive therapy
title_short Confirmatory Efficacy and Safety Trial of Magnetic Seizure Therapy for Depression (CREST-MST): study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority trial of magnetic seizure therapy versus electroconvulsive therapy
title_full Confirmatory Efficacy and Safety Trial of Magnetic Seizure Therapy for Depression (CREST-MST): study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority trial of magnetic seizure therapy versus electroconvulsive therapy
title_fullStr Confirmatory Efficacy and Safety Trial of Magnetic Seizure Therapy for Depression (CREST-MST): study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority trial of magnetic seizure therapy versus electroconvulsive therapy
title_full_unstemmed Confirmatory Efficacy and Safety Trial of Magnetic Seizure Therapy for Depression (CREST-MST): study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority trial of magnetic seizure therapy versus electroconvulsive therapy
title_sort confirmatory efficacy and safety trial of magnetic seizure therapy for depression (crest-mst): study protocol for a randomized non-inferiority trial of magnetic seizure therapy versus electroconvulsive therapy
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/d1003ca162e449d5884898943ebafd36
work_keys_str_mv AT zafirisjdaskalakis confirmatoryefficacyandsafetytrialofmagneticseizuretherapyfordepressioncrestmststudyprotocolforarandomizednoninferioritytrialofmagneticseizuretherapyversuselectroconvulsivetherapy
AT caroltamminga confirmatoryefficacyandsafetytrialofmagneticseizuretherapyfordepressioncrestmststudyprotocolforarandomizednoninferioritytrialofmagneticseizuretherapyversuselectroconvulsivetherapy
AT alanahthroop confirmatoryefficacyandsafetytrialofmagneticseizuretherapyfordepressioncrestmststudyprotocolforarandomizednoninferioritytrialofmagneticseizuretherapyversuselectroconvulsivetherapy
AT lucypalmer confirmatoryefficacyandsafetytrialofmagneticseizuretherapyfordepressioncrestmststudyprotocolforarandomizednoninferioritytrialofmagneticseizuretherapyversuselectroconvulsivetherapy
AT juliadimitrova confirmatoryefficacyandsafetytrialofmagneticseizuretherapyfordepressioncrestmststudyprotocolforarandomizednoninferioritytrialofmagneticseizuretherapyversuselectroconvulsivetherapy
AT faranakfarzan confirmatoryefficacyandsafetytrialofmagneticseizuretherapyfordepressioncrestmststudyprotocolforarandomizednoninferioritytrialofmagneticseizuretherapyversuselectroconvulsivetherapy
AT kevinethorpe confirmatoryefficacyandsafetytrialofmagneticseizuretherapyfordepressioncrestmststudyprotocolforarandomizednoninferioritytrialofmagneticseizuretherapyversuselectroconvulsivetherapy
AT shawnmmcclintock confirmatoryefficacyandsafetytrialofmagneticseizuretherapyfordepressioncrestmststudyprotocolforarandomizednoninferioritytrialofmagneticseizuretherapyversuselectroconvulsivetherapy
AT danielmblumberger confirmatoryefficacyandsafetytrialofmagneticseizuretherapyfordepressioncrestmststudyprotocolforarandomizednoninferioritytrialofmagneticseizuretherapyversuselectroconvulsivetherapy
_version_ 1718429196792889344