Para-aortic lymph node metastases in pancreatic cancer should not be considered a watershed for curative resection

Abstract No international consensus regarding the resection of the para-aortic lymph node (PALN) station Ln16b1 during pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been reached. The present retrospectively investigated 264 patients with PDAC who underwent curative pancreatod...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sebastian Hempel, Verena Plodeck, Franz Mierke, Marius Distler, Daniela E. Aust, Hans-Detlev Saeger, Jürgen Weitz, Thilo Welsch
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d10062847a524af3a9ee1988da84a66d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d10062847a524af3a9ee1988da84a66d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d10062847a524af3a9ee1988da84a66d2021-12-02T12:30:53ZPara-aortic lymph node metastases in pancreatic cancer should not be considered a watershed for curative resection10.1038/s41598-017-08165-w2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/d10062847a524af3a9ee1988da84a66d2017-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08165-whttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract No international consensus regarding the resection of the para-aortic lymph node (PALN) station Ln16b1 during pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been reached. The present retrospectively investigated 264 patients with PDAC who underwent curative pancreatoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy between 2005–2015. In 95 cases, the PALN were separately labelled and histopathologically analysed. Metastatic PALN (PALN+) were found in 14.7% (14/95). PALN+ stage was associated with increased regional lymph node metastasis. The median overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic PALN and with non-metastatic PALN (PALN−) was 14.1 and 20.2 months, respectively. Five of the PALN+ patients (36%) survived >19 months. The OS of PALN+ and those staged pN1 PALN− was not significantly different (P = 0.743). Patients who underwent surgical exploration or palliative surgery (n = 194) had a lower median survival of 8.8 (95% confidence interval: 7.3–10.1) months. PALN status could not be reliably predicted by preoperative computed tomography. We concluded that the survival data of PALN+ cases is comparable with advanced pN+ stages; one-third of the patients may expect longer survival after radical resection. Therefore, routine refusal of curative resection in the case of PALN metastasis is not indicated.Sebastian HempelVerena PlodeckFranz MierkeMarius DistlerDaniela E. AustHans-Detlev SaegerJürgen WeitzThilo WelschNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Sebastian Hempel
Verena Plodeck
Franz Mierke
Marius Distler
Daniela E. Aust
Hans-Detlev Saeger
Jürgen Weitz
Thilo Welsch
Para-aortic lymph node metastases in pancreatic cancer should not be considered a watershed for curative resection
description Abstract No international consensus regarding the resection of the para-aortic lymph node (PALN) station Ln16b1 during pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been reached. The present retrospectively investigated 264 patients with PDAC who underwent curative pancreatoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy between 2005–2015. In 95 cases, the PALN were separately labelled and histopathologically analysed. Metastatic PALN (PALN+) were found in 14.7% (14/95). PALN+ stage was associated with increased regional lymph node metastasis. The median overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic PALN and with non-metastatic PALN (PALN−) was 14.1 and 20.2 months, respectively. Five of the PALN+ patients (36%) survived >19 months. The OS of PALN+ and those staged pN1 PALN− was not significantly different (P = 0.743). Patients who underwent surgical exploration or palliative surgery (n = 194) had a lower median survival of 8.8 (95% confidence interval: 7.3–10.1) months. PALN status could not be reliably predicted by preoperative computed tomography. We concluded that the survival data of PALN+ cases is comparable with advanced pN+ stages; one-third of the patients may expect longer survival after radical resection. Therefore, routine refusal of curative resection in the case of PALN metastasis is not indicated.
format article
author Sebastian Hempel
Verena Plodeck
Franz Mierke
Marius Distler
Daniela E. Aust
Hans-Detlev Saeger
Jürgen Weitz
Thilo Welsch
author_facet Sebastian Hempel
Verena Plodeck
Franz Mierke
Marius Distler
Daniela E. Aust
Hans-Detlev Saeger
Jürgen Weitz
Thilo Welsch
author_sort Sebastian Hempel
title Para-aortic lymph node metastases in pancreatic cancer should not be considered a watershed for curative resection
title_short Para-aortic lymph node metastases in pancreatic cancer should not be considered a watershed for curative resection
title_full Para-aortic lymph node metastases in pancreatic cancer should not be considered a watershed for curative resection
title_fullStr Para-aortic lymph node metastases in pancreatic cancer should not be considered a watershed for curative resection
title_full_unstemmed Para-aortic lymph node metastases in pancreatic cancer should not be considered a watershed for curative resection
title_sort para-aortic lymph node metastases in pancreatic cancer should not be considered a watershed for curative resection
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/d10062847a524af3a9ee1988da84a66d
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastianhempel paraaorticlymphnodemetastasesinpancreaticcancershouldnotbeconsideredawatershedforcurativeresection
AT verenaplodeck paraaorticlymphnodemetastasesinpancreaticcancershouldnotbeconsideredawatershedforcurativeresection
AT franzmierke paraaorticlymphnodemetastasesinpancreaticcancershouldnotbeconsideredawatershedforcurativeresection
AT mariusdistler paraaorticlymphnodemetastasesinpancreaticcancershouldnotbeconsideredawatershedforcurativeresection
AT danielaeaust paraaorticlymphnodemetastasesinpancreaticcancershouldnotbeconsideredawatershedforcurativeresection
AT hansdetlevsaeger paraaorticlymphnodemetastasesinpancreaticcancershouldnotbeconsideredawatershedforcurativeresection
AT jurgenweitz paraaorticlymphnodemetastasesinpancreaticcancershouldnotbeconsideredawatershedforcurativeresection
AT thilowelsch paraaorticlymphnodemetastasesinpancreaticcancershouldnotbeconsideredawatershedforcurativeresection
_version_ 1718394307114696704