Using the available indicators of potential biodiversity damage for Life Cycle Assessment on soybean crop according to Brazilian ecoregions

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the use of and suggest possible adjustments to indicators of biodiversity loss for LCA proposed by Chaudhary and Books (2018). For this, we analyzed soybean production in Brazil. Potential damage to biodiversity has been determined for all Brazilian ecoregion...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kássio R. Garcia Lucas, Assumpció Antón, Maurício Ursi Ventura, Edilene Pereira Andrade, Ricardo Ralisch
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d134400228464bd79e8b9ec0283b22a3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d134400228464bd79e8b9ec0283b22a3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d134400228464bd79e8b9ec0283b22a32021-12-01T04:53:51ZUsing the available indicators of potential biodiversity damage for Life Cycle Assessment on soybean crop according to Brazilian ecoregions1470-160X10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107809https://doaj.org/article/d134400228464bd79e8b9ec0283b22a32021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X2100474Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/1470-160XThe purpose of the study was to evaluate the use of and suggest possible adjustments to indicators of biodiversity loss for LCA proposed by Chaudhary and Books (2018). For this, we analyzed soybean production in Brazil. Potential damage to biodiversity has been determined for all Brazilian ecoregions: the Amazon; the Atlantic forest; Caatinga; Cerrado; Pampas; and the Pantanal. Two dimensions of assessment were considered – global and regional – in addition to Average-country. An adjustment was proposed for the vulnerability coefficient to the indicators Average-country Brazil: the Regional Species Fragility Index (FI). Two inventories were created using two different functional units: area of production of soybean by ecoregion (year m2); and area corresponding to production of 1 kg of soybean (year m2). Thus, we observed that when the indicators of aggregate values were adopted, the Atlantic Forest was the ecoregion most affected by the crop. Regarding the assessments of the Potential Biodiversity Damage (BD) Global and Regional indicators, the Atlantic Forest and the Amazon were the ecoregions that suffered the highest impacts, mainly on plants, birds and amphibians taxa. Besides, the impacts at the global level were always more expressive than the regional ones. Due to this, we noticed that the results were influenced by the Vulnerability Score (VS). The suitability of the VS for FI is relevant and the adjustment in the equation can be suggested for other regions. Considering the results found here, to prevent regional impacts, technical measures such as extensive farming and crop rotation should be prioritized as impact mitigation actions. However, political measures tend to be more effective at geographic levels when addressing more than one ecoregion, due to the standardization of preservation procedures. Thus, from the results reported here, we conclude that the FI is relevant to diagnose measures at the administrative geographic levels of the ecoregions present in a single country, and the applied indicators reinforce that the Atlantic Forest ecoregion is the most vulnerable due to the replacement of wild forest for cultivated areas, which includes soybean crops.Kássio R. Garcia LucasAssumpció AntónMaurício Ursi VenturaEdilene Pereira AndradeRicardo RalischElsevierarticleLand use changeBrazilian biomesCharacterization factorsBiodiversity preservationEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Indicators, Vol 127, Iss , Pp 107809- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Land use change
Brazilian biomes
Characterization factors
Biodiversity preservation
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Land use change
Brazilian biomes
Characterization factors
Biodiversity preservation
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Kássio R. Garcia Lucas
Assumpció Antón
Maurício Ursi Ventura
Edilene Pereira Andrade
Ricardo Ralisch
Using the available indicators of potential biodiversity damage for Life Cycle Assessment on soybean crop according to Brazilian ecoregions
description The purpose of the study was to evaluate the use of and suggest possible adjustments to indicators of biodiversity loss for LCA proposed by Chaudhary and Books (2018). For this, we analyzed soybean production in Brazil. Potential damage to biodiversity has been determined for all Brazilian ecoregions: the Amazon; the Atlantic forest; Caatinga; Cerrado; Pampas; and the Pantanal. Two dimensions of assessment were considered – global and regional – in addition to Average-country. An adjustment was proposed for the vulnerability coefficient to the indicators Average-country Brazil: the Regional Species Fragility Index (FI). Two inventories were created using two different functional units: area of production of soybean by ecoregion (year m2); and area corresponding to production of 1 kg of soybean (year m2). Thus, we observed that when the indicators of aggregate values were adopted, the Atlantic Forest was the ecoregion most affected by the crop. Regarding the assessments of the Potential Biodiversity Damage (BD) Global and Regional indicators, the Atlantic Forest and the Amazon were the ecoregions that suffered the highest impacts, mainly on plants, birds and amphibians taxa. Besides, the impacts at the global level were always more expressive than the regional ones. Due to this, we noticed that the results were influenced by the Vulnerability Score (VS). The suitability of the VS for FI is relevant and the adjustment in the equation can be suggested for other regions. Considering the results found here, to prevent regional impacts, technical measures such as extensive farming and crop rotation should be prioritized as impact mitigation actions. However, political measures tend to be more effective at geographic levels when addressing more than one ecoregion, due to the standardization of preservation procedures. Thus, from the results reported here, we conclude that the FI is relevant to diagnose measures at the administrative geographic levels of the ecoregions present in a single country, and the applied indicators reinforce that the Atlantic Forest ecoregion is the most vulnerable due to the replacement of wild forest for cultivated areas, which includes soybean crops.
format article
author Kássio R. Garcia Lucas
Assumpció Antón
Maurício Ursi Ventura
Edilene Pereira Andrade
Ricardo Ralisch
author_facet Kássio R. Garcia Lucas
Assumpció Antón
Maurício Ursi Ventura
Edilene Pereira Andrade
Ricardo Ralisch
author_sort Kássio R. Garcia Lucas
title Using the available indicators of potential biodiversity damage for Life Cycle Assessment on soybean crop according to Brazilian ecoregions
title_short Using the available indicators of potential biodiversity damage for Life Cycle Assessment on soybean crop according to Brazilian ecoregions
title_full Using the available indicators of potential biodiversity damage for Life Cycle Assessment on soybean crop according to Brazilian ecoregions
title_fullStr Using the available indicators of potential biodiversity damage for Life Cycle Assessment on soybean crop according to Brazilian ecoregions
title_full_unstemmed Using the available indicators of potential biodiversity damage for Life Cycle Assessment on soybean crop according to Brazilian ecoregions
title_sort using the available indicators of potential biodiversity damage for life cycle assessment on soybean crop according to brazilian ecoregions
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/d134400228464bd79e8b9ec0283b22a3
work_keys_str_mv AT kassiorgarcialucas usingtheavailableindicatorsofpotentialbiodiversitydamageforlifecycleassessmentonsoybeancropaccordingtobrazilianecoregions
AT assumpcioanton usingtheavailableindicatorsofpotentialbiodiversitydamageforlifecycleassessmentonsoybeancropaccordingtobrazilianecoregions
AT mauricioursiventura usingtheavailableindicatorsofpotentialbiodiversitydamageforlifecycleassessmentonsoybeancropaccordingtobrazilianecoregions
AT edilenepereiraandrade usingtheavailableindicatorsofpotentialbiodiversitydamageforlifecycleassessmentonsoybeancropaccordingtobrazilianecoregions
AT ricardoralisch usingtheavailableindicatorsofpotentialbiodiversitydamageforlifecycleassessmentonsoybeancropaccordingtobrazilianecoregions
_version_ 1718405691797929984