An Evaluation Framework and Instrument for Evaluating e-Assessment Tools

e-Assessment, in the form of tools and systems that deliver and administer multiple choice questions (MCQs), is used increasingly, raising the need for evaluation and validation of such systems. This research uses literature and a series of six empirical action research studies to develop an evaluat...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Upasana Gitanjali Singh, Mary Ruth de Villiers
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Athabasca University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d15acf0cf7054be5bc31bf309daeeb55
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d15acf0cf7054be5bc31bf309daeeb55
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d15acf0cf7054be5bc31bf309daeeb552021-12-02T17:15:37ZAn Evaluation Framework and Instrument for Evaluating e-Assessment Tools10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.28041492-3831https://doaj.org/article/d15acf0cf7054be5bc31bf309daeeb552017-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2804https://doaj.org/toc/1492-3831e-Assessment, in the form of tools and systems that deliver and administer multiple choice questions (MCQs), is used increasingly, raising the need for evaluation and validation of such systems. This research uses literature and a series of six empirical action research studies to develop an evaluation framework of categories and criteria called SEAT (Selecting and Evaluating e-Assessment Tools). SEAT was converted to an interactive electronic instrument, e-SEAT, to assist academics in making informed choices when selecting MCQ systems for adoption or evaluating existing ones. Upasana Gitanjali SinghMary Ruth de VilliersAthabasca University Pressarticleaction researche-assessmentevaluation criteriaevaluation frameworkevaluation instrumentmultiple choice questionsSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691ENInternational Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol 18, Iss 6 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic action research
e-assessment
evaluation criteria
evaluation framework
evaluation instrument
multiple choice questions
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
spellingShingle action research
e-assessment
evaluation criteria
evaluation framework
evaluation instrument
multiple choice questions
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Upasana Gitanjali Singh
Mary Ruth de Villiers
An Evaluation Framework and Instrument for Evaluating e-Assessment Tools
description e-Assessment, in the form of tools and systems that deliver and administer multiple choice questions (MCQs), is used increasingly, raising the need for evaluation and validation of such systems. This research uses literature and a series of six empirical action research studies to develop an evaluation framework of categories and criteria called SEAT (Selecting and Evaluating e-Assessment Tools). SEAT was converted to an interactive electronic instrument, e-SEAT, to assist academics in making informed choices when selecting MCQ systems for adoption or evaluating existing ones.
format article
author Upasana Gitanjali Singh
Mary Ruth de Villiers
author_facet Upasana Gitanjali Singh
Mary Ruth de Villiers
author_sort Upasana Gitanjali Singh
title An Evaluation Framework and Instrument for Evaluating e-Assessment Tools
title_short An Evaluation Framework and Instrument for Evaluating e-Assessment Tools
title_full An Evaluation Framework and Instrument for Evaluating e-Assessment Tools
title_fullStr An Evaluation Framework and Instrument for Evaluating e-Assessment Tools
title_full_unstemmed An Evaluation Framework and Instrument for Evaluating e-Assessment Tools
title_sort evaluation framework and instrument for evaluating e-assessment tools
publisher Athabasca University Press
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/d15acf0cf7054be5bc31bf309daeeb55
work_keys_str_mv AT upasanagitanjalisingh anevaluationframeworkandinstrumentforevaluatingeassessmenttools
AT maryruthdevilliers anevaluationframeworkandinstrumentforevaluatingeassessmenttools
AT upasanagitanjalisingh evaluationframeworkandinstrumentforevaluatingeassessmenttools
AT maryruthdevilliers evaluationframeworkandinstrumentforevaluatingeassessmenttools
_version_ 1718381288836038656