A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value
ObjectivesTo investigate the diagnostic performance of the Kaiser score and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to differentiate Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category 4 lesions at dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.MethodsThis was a single-institution retrospective study of p...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/d162f03887a64d94b308b15d554791b1 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:d162f03887a64d94b308b15d554791b1 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:d162f03887a64d94b308b15d554791b12021-12-02T10:54:07ZA Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value2234-943X10.3389/fonc.2021.779642https://doaj.org/article/d162f03887a64d94b308b15d554791b12021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.779642/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2234-943XObjectivesTo investigate the diagnostic performance of the Kaiser score and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to differentiate Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category 4 lesions at dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.MethodsThis was a single-institution retrospective study of patients who underwent breast MRI from March 2020 to June 2021. All image data were acquired with a 3-T MRI system. Kaiser score of each lesion was assigned by an experienced breast radiologist. Kaiser score+ was determined by combining ADC and Kaiser score. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Kaiser score+, Kaiser score, and ADC. The area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated and compared by using the Delong test. The differences in sensitivity and specificity between different indicators were determined by the McNemar test.ResultsThe study involved 243 women (mean age, 43.1 years; age range, 18–67 years) with 268 MR BI-RADS 4 lesions. Overall diagnostic performance for Kaiser score (AUC, 0.902) was significantly higher than for ADC (AUC, 0.81; p = 0.004). There were no significant differences in AUCs between Kaiser score and Kaiser score+ (p = 0.134). The Kaiser score was superior to ADC in avoiding unnecessary biopsies (p < 0.001). Compared with the Kaiser score alone, the specificity of Kaiser score+ increased by 7.82%, however, at the price of a lower sensitivity.ConclusionFor MR BI-RADS category 4 breast lesions, the Kaiser score was superior to ADC mapping regarding the potential to avoid unnecessary biopsies. However, the combination of both indicators did not significantly contribute to breast cancer diagnosis of this subgroup.Lingsong MengXin ZhaoLin LuQingna XingKaiyu WangYafei GuoHonglei ShangYan ChenMengyue HuangYongbing SunXiaoan ZhangFrontiers Media S.A.articleKaiser scoreapparent diffusion coefficientbreast cancerBI-RADSspecificityNeoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensRC254-282ENFrontiers in Oncology, Vol 11 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Kaiser score apparent diffusion coefficient breast cancer BI-RADS specificity Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens RC254-282 |
spellingShingle |
Kaiser score apparent diffusion coefficient breast cancer BI-RADS specificity Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens RC254-282 Lingsong Meng Xin Zhao Lin Lu Qingna Xing Kaiyu Wang Yafei Guo Honglei Shang Yan Chen Mengyue Huang Yongbing Sun Xiaoan Zhang A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value |
description |
ObjectivesTo investigate the diagnostic performance of the Kaiser score and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to differentiate Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category 4 lesions at dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.MethodsThis was a single-institution retrospective study of patients who underwent breast MRI from March 2020 to June 2021. All image data were acquired with a 3-T MRI system. Kaiser score of each lesion was assigned by an experienced breast radiologist. Kaiser score+ was determined by combining ADC and Kaiser score. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Kaiser score+, Kaiser score, and ADC. The area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated and compared by using the Delong test. The differences in sensitivity and specificity between different indicators were determined by the McNemar test.ResultsThe study involved 243 women (mean age, 43.1 years; age range, 18–67 years) with 268 MR BI-RADS 4 lesions. Overall diagnostic performance for Kaiser score (AUC, 0.902) was significantly higher than for ADC (AUC, 0.81; p = 0.004). There were no significant differences in AUCs between Kaiser score and Kaiser score+ (p = 0.134). The Kaiser score was superior to ADC in avoiding unnecessary biopsies (p < 0.001). Compared with the Kaiser score alone, the specificity of Kaiser score+ increased by 7.82%, however, at the price of a lower sensitivity.ConclusionFor MR BI-RADS category 4 breast lesions, the Kaiser score was superior to ADC mapping regarding the potential to avoid unnecessary biopsies. However, the combination of both indicators did not significantly contribute to breast cancer diagnosis of this subgroup. |
format |
article |
author |
Lingsong Meng Xin Zhao Lin Lu Qingna Xing Kaiyu Wang Yafei Guo Honglei Shang Yan Chen Mengyue Huang Yongbing Sun Xiaoan Zhang |
author_facet |
Lingsong Meng Xin Zhao Lin Lu Qingna Xing Kaiyu Wang Yafei Guo Honglei Shang Yan Chen Mengyue Huang Yongbing Sun Xiaoan Zhang |
author_sort |
Lingsong Meng |
title |
A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value |
title_short |
A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value |
title_full |
A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value |
title_fullStr |
A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value |
title_sort |
comparative assessment of mr bi-rads 4 breast lesions with kaiser score and apparent diffusion coefficient value |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/d162f03887a64d94b308b15d554791b1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lingsongmeng acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue AT xinzhao acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue AT linlu acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue AT qingnaxing acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue AT kaiyuwang acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue AT yafeiguo acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue AT hongleishang acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue AT yanchen acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue AT mengyuehuang acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue AT yongbingsun acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue AT xiaoanzhang acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue AT lingsongmeng comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue AT xinzhao comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue AT linlu comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue AT qingnaxing comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue AT kaiyuwang comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue AT yafeiguo comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue AT hongleishang comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue AT yanchen comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue AT mengyuehuang comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue AT yongbingsun comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue AT xiaoanzhang comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue |
_version_ |
1718396495268413440 |