A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value

ObjectivesTo investigate the diagnostic performance of the Kaiser score and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to differentiate Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category 4 lesions at dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.MethodsThis was a single-institution retrospective study of p...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lingsong Meng, Xin Zhao, Lin Lu, Qingna Xing, Kaiyu Wang, Yafei Guo, Honglei Shang, Yan Chen, Mengyue Huang, Yongbing Sun, Xiaoan Zhang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d162f03887a64d94b308b15d554791b1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d162f03887a64d94b308b15d554791b1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d162f03887a64d94b308b15d554791b12021-12-02T10:54:07ZA Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value2234-943X10.3389/fonc.2021.779642https://doaj.org/article/d162f03887a64d94b308b15d554791b12021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.779642/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2234-943XObjectivesTo investigate the diagnostic performance of the Kaiser score and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to differentiate Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category 4 lesions at dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.MethodsThis was a single-institution retrospective study of patients who underwent breast MRI from March 2020 to June 2021. All image data were acquired with a 3-T MRI system. Kaiser score of each lesion was assigned by an experienced breast radiologist. Kaiser score+ was determined by combining ADC and Kaiser score. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Kaiser score+, Kaiser score, and ADC. The area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated and compared by using the Delong test. The differences in sensitivity and specificity between different indicators were determined by the McNemar test.ResultsThe study involved 243 women (mean age, 43.1 years; age range, 18–67 years) with 268 MR BI-RADS 4 lesions. Overall diagnostic performance for Kaiser score (AUC, 0.902) was significantly higher than for ADC (AUC, 0.81; p = 0.004). There were no significant differences in AUCs between Kaiser score and Kaiser score+ (p = 0.134). The Kaiser score was superior to ADC in avoiding unnecessary biopsies (p < 0.001). Compared with the Kaiser score alone, the specificity of Kaiser score+ increased by 7.82%, however, at the price of a lower sensitivity.ConclusionFor MR BI-RADS category 4 breast lesions, the Kaiser score was superior to ADC mapping regarding the potential to avoid unnecessary biopsies. However, the combination of both indicators did not significantly contribute to breast cancer diagnosis of this subgroup.Lingsong MengXin ZhaoLin LuQingna XingKaiyu WangYafei GuoHonglei ShangYan ChenMengyue HuangYongbing SunXiaoan ZhangFrontiers Media S.A.articleKaiser scoreapparent diffusion coefficientbreast cancerBI-RADSspecificityNeoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensRC254-282ENFrontiers in Oncology, Vol 11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Kaiser score
apparent diffusion coefficient
breast cancer
BI-RADS
specificity
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
spellingShingle Kaiser score
apparent diffusion coefficient
breast cancer
BI-RADS
specificity
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
Lingsong Meng
Xin Zhao
Lin Lu
Qingna Xing
Kaiyu Wang
Yafei Guo
Honglei Shang
Yan Chen
Mengyue Huang
Yongbing Sun
Xiaoan Zhang
A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value
description ObjectivesTo investigate the diagnostic performance of the Kaiser score and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to differentiate Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category 4 lesions at dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.MethodsThis was a single-institution retrospective study of patients who underwent breast MRI from March 2020 to June 2021. All image data were acquired with a 3-T MRI system. Kaiser score of each lesion was assigned by an experienced breast radiologist. Kaiser score+ was determined by combining ADC and Kaiser score. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Kaiser score+, Kaiser score, and ADC. The area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated and compared by using the Delong test. The differences in sensitivity and specificity between different indicators were determined by the McNemar test.ResultsThe study involved 243 women (mean age, 43.1 years; age range, 18–67 years) with 268 MR BI-RADS 4 lesions. Overall diagnostic performance for Kaiser score (AUC, 0.902) was significantly higher than for ADC (AUC, 0.81; p = 0.004). There were no significant differences in AUCs between Kaiser score and Kaiser score+ (p = 0.134). The Kaiser score was superior to ADC in avoiding unnecessary biopsies (p < 0.001). Compared with the Kaiser score alone, the specificity of Kaiser score+ increased by 7.82%, however, at the price of a lower sensitivity.ConclusionFor MR BI-RADS category 4 breast lesions, the Kaiser score was superior to ADC mapping regarding the potential to avoid unnecessary biopsies. However, the combination of both indicators did not significantly contribute to breast cancer diagnosis of this subgroup.
format article
author Lingsong Meng
Xin Zhao
Lin Lu
Qingna Xing
Kaiyu Wang
Yafei Guo
Honglei Shang
Yan Chen
Mengyue Huang
Yongbing Sun
Xiaoan Zhang
author_facet Lingsong Meng
Xin Zhao
Lin Lu
Qingna Xing
Kaiyu Wang
Yafei Guo
Honglei Shang
Yan Chen
Mengyue Huang
Yongbing Sun
Xiaoan Zhang
author_sort Lingsong Meng
title A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value
title_short A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value
title_full A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value
title_fullStr A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value
title_sort comparative assessment of mr bi-rads 4 breast lesions with kaiser score and apparent diffusion coefficient value
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/d162f03887a64d94b308b15d554791b1
work_keys_str_mv AT lingsongmeng acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT xinzhao acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT linlu acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT qingnaxing acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT kaiyuwang acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT yafeiguo acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT hongleishang acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT yanchen acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT mengyuehuang acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT yongbingsun acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT xiaoanzhang acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT lingsongmeng comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT xinzhao comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT linlu comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT qingnaxing comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT kaiyuwang comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT yafeiguo comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT hongleishang comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT yanchen comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT mengyuehuang comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT yongbingsun comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT xiaoanzhang comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
_version_ 1718396495268413440