Offsetting Risk in a Neoliberal Environment: The Link between Asset-Based Welfare and NIMBYism

Affordable housing policy in the developed world has been undergoing a systematic commodification for several decades, including a push for homeownership as the normalized tenure and a commodity unto itself. Scholars suggest this push for homeownership is part and parcel of a neoliberal asset-based...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Matthew C. Record
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d1659fd6e83f4511bcba39670171a5ca
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d1659fd6e83f4511bcba39670171a5ca
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d1659fd6e83f4511bcba39670171a5ca2021-11-25T18:08:42ZOffsetting Risk in a Neoliberal Environment: The Link between Asset-Based Welfare and NIMBYism10.3390/jrfm141105471911-80741911-8066https://doaj.org/article/d1659fd6e83f4511bcba39670171a5ca2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/11/547https://doaj.org/toc/1911-8066https://doaj.org/toc/1911-8074Affordable housing policy in the developed world has been undergoing a systematic commodification for several decades, including a push for homeownership as the normalized tenure and a commodity unto itself. Scholars suggest this push for homeownership is part and parcel of a neoliberal asset-based welfare to supplement, or even outright replace, traditionally defined benefit pension schemes. These policies individualize risk and re-fashion individual citizens as long-term financial planners, navigating the uncertainty inherent in international financial markets and general financial management. Less deeply explored, however, are the perverse incentives this system creates for homeowners to protect their home “investment” by leveraging planning policies, zoning, and land-use restrictions to preserve the community status quo and lock in the value of their home. In a policy environment in which long-term financial risk is individualized and public social welfare and pension systems are relegated to the smallest number of individuals possible, this type of NIMBYism (Not in My Backyard) is rather rational behavior, even as it simultaneously staunches the supply of new housing and drives up prices for non-homeowners. As such, this analysis synthesizes the existing research to make a formal theoretical connection between the neoliberal push for commodified housing, asset-based welfare, and the intractable political problem of NIMBYism.Matthew C. RecordMDPI AGarticlehousingpensionsrisk managementcommodificationneoliberalismaffordable housingRisk in industry. Risk managementHD61FinanceHG1-9999ENJournal of Risk and Financial Management, Vol 14, Iss 547, p 547 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic housing
pensions
risk management
commodification
neoliberalism
affordable housing
Risk in industry. Risk management
HD61
Finance
HG1-9999
spellingShingle housing
pensions
risk management
commodification
neoliberalism
affordable housing
Risk in industry. Risk management
HD61
Finance
HG1-9999
Matthew C. Record
Offsetting Risk in a Neoliberal Environment: The Link between Asset-Based Welfare and NIMBYism
description Affordable housing policy in the developed world has been undergoing a systematic commodification for several decades, including a push for homeownership as the normalized tenure and a commodity unto itself. Scholars suggest this push for homeownership is part and parcel of a neoliberal asset-based welfare to supplement, or even outright replace, traditionally defined benefit pension schemes. These policies individualize risk and re-fashion individual citizens as long-term financial planners, navigating the uncertainty inherent in international financial markets and general financial management. Less deeply explored, however, are the perverse incentives this system creates for homeowners to protect their home “investment” by leveraging planning policies, zoning, and land-use restrictions to preserve the community status quo and lock in the value of their home. In a policy environment in which long-term financial risk is individualized and public social welfare and pension systems are relegated to the smallest number of individuals possible, this type of NIMBYism (Not in My Backyard) is rather rational behavior, even as it simultaneously staunches the supply of new housing and drives up prices for non-homeowners. As such, this analysis synthesizes the existing research to make a formal theoretical connection between the neoliberal push for commodified housing, asset-based welfare, and the intractable political problem of NIMBYism.
format article
author Matthew C. Record
author_facet Matthew C. Record
author_sort Matthew C. Record
title Offsetting Risk in a Neoliberal Environment: The Link between Asset-Based Welfare and NIMBYism
title_short Offsetting Risk in a Neoliberal Environment: The Link between Asset-Based Welfare and NIMBYism
title_full Offsetting Risk in a Neoliberal Environment: The Link between Asset-Based Welfare and NIMBYism
title_fullStr Offsetting Risk in a Neoliberal Environment: The Link between Asset-Based Welfare and NIMBYism
title_full_unstemmed Offsetting Risk in a Neoliberal Environment: The Link between Asset-Based Welfare and NIMBYism
title_sort offsetting risk in a neoliberal environment: the link between asset-based welfare and nimbyism
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/d1659fd6e83f4511bcba39670171a5ca
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewcrecord offsettingriskinaneoliberalenvironmentthelinkbetweenassetbasedwelfareandnimbyism
_version_ 1718411586681438208