Gender differences in individual variation in academic grades fail to fit expected patterns for STEM
Men are over-represented in the STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) workforce even though girls outperform boys in these subjects at school. Here, the authors cast doubt on one leading explanation for this paradox, the ‘variability hypothesis’.
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/d1a2a181a6fc4ed08e1056baec3df6f0 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:d1a2a181a6fc4ed08e1056baec3df6f0 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:d1a2a181a6fc4ed08e1056baec3df6f02021-12-02T14:39:24ZGender differences in individual variation in academic grades fail to fit expected patterns for STEM10.1038/s41467-018-06292-02041-1723https://doaj.org/article/d1a2a181a6fc4ed08e1056baec3df6f02018-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06292-0https://doaj.org/toc/2041-1723Men are over-represented in the STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) workforce even though girls outperform boys in these subjects at school. Here, the authors cast doubt on one leading explanation for this paradox, the ‘variability hypothesis’.R. E. O’DeaM. LagiszM. D. JennionsS. NakagawaNature PortfolioarticleScienceQENNature Communications, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2018) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Science Q R. E. O’Dea M. Lagisz M. D. Jennions S. Nakagawa Gender differences in individual variation in academic grades fail to fit expected patterns for STEM |
description |
Men are over-represented in the STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) workforce even though girls outperform boys in these subjects at school. Here, the authors cast doubt on one leading explanation for this paradox, the ‘variability hypothesis’. |
format |
article |
author |
R. E. O’Dea M. Lagisz M. D. Jennions S. Nakagawa |
author_facet |
R. E. O’Dea M. Lagisz M. D. Jennions S. Nakagawa |
author_sort |
R. E. O’Dea |
title |
Gender differences in individual variation in academic grades fail to fit expected patterns for STEM |
title_short |
Gender differences in individual variation in academic grades fail to fit expected patterns for STEM |
title_full |
Gender differences in individual variation in academic grades fail to fit expected patterns for STEM |
title_fullStr |
Gender differences in individual variation in academic grades fail to fit expected patterns for STEM |
title_full_unstemmed |
Gender differences in individual variation in academic grades fail to fit expected patterns for STEM |
title_sort |
gender differences in individual variation in academic grades fail to fit expected patterns for stem |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/d1a2a181a6fc4ed08e1056baec3df6f0 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT reodea genderdifferencesinindividualvariationinacademicgradesfailtofitexpectedpatternsforstem AT mlagisz genderdifferencesinindividualvariationinacademicgradesfailtofitexpectedpatternsforstem AT mdjennions genderdifferencesinindividualvariationinacademicgradesfailtofitexpectedpatternsforstem AT snakagawa genderdifferencesinindividualvariationinacademicgradesfailtofitexpectedpatternsforstem |
_version_ |
1718390619865350144 |