Contextualisation within context: A pedagogical spectrum of six methodologies
The field of contextualisation is broad, with a vast diversity of definitions, models and methodologies. There are now many useful models of contextualisation from which to choose. But clearly, there is no one-size-fits-all solution – the diverse collection of options are not equally valid or useful...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | AF EN |
Publicado: |
AOSIS
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/d1b2663ff7ad41c3a42701cc939fc119 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:d1b2663ff7ad41c3a42701cc939fc119 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:d1b2663ff7ad41c3a42701cc939fc1192021-11-24T07:40:42ZContextualisation within context: A pedagogical spectrum of six methodologies1018-64412305-085310.4102/ids.v55i1.2751https://doaj.org/article/d1b2663ff7ad41c3a42701cc939fc1192021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://indieskriflig.org.za/index.php/skriflig/article/view/2751https://doaj.org/toc/1018-6441https://doaj.org/toc/2305-0853The field of contextualisation is broad, with a vast diversity of definitions, models and methodologies. There are now many useful models of contextualisation from which to choose. But clearly, there is no one-size-fits-all solution – the diverse collection of options are not equally valid or useful or effective in all ministry contexts. How should one choose the best method for his or her ministry and context? This article argued that the ministry ‘context’ – the area, actors and activity of ministry – is the key determining factor for choosing the most effective contextualisation method for each ministry situation. The various contextualisation models and methods are based on the ministry context for which they are designed, as the constraints of each specific ministry context significantly influence the ideal contextualisation methodology. This article considered six distinct ministry contexts, each of which requires a different contextualisation methodology. Contribution: This article contributed to the discussion of contextualisation methodologies. While there are many settled theories and methods in this area, there remains considerable divergence and disagreement around various contextualisation concepts and practices. This article provides a useful pedagogical framework for organising the various methods in order to aid the academic discussion as well as the practical application of these methods.Brian A. DeVriesAOSISarticlecontextualisationmission methodologygospel and cultureintercultural theologieshermeneuticsincarnationtranslationindigenisationcontextual theologyintercultural ministryPractical TheologyBV1-5099Practical religion. The Christian lifeBV4485-5099AFENIn die Skriflig, Vol 55, Iss 1, Pp e1-e8 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
AF EN |
topic |
contextualisation mission methodology gospel and culture intercultural theologies hermeneutics incarnation translation indigenisation contextual theology intercultural ministry Practical Theology BV1-5099 Practical religion. The Christian life BV4485-5099 |
spellingShingle |
contextualisation mission methodology gospel and culture intercultural theologies hermeneutics incarnation translation indigenisation contextual theology intercultural ministry Practical Theology BV1-5099 Practical religion. The Christian life BV4485-5099 Brian A. DeVries Contextualisation within context: A pedagogical spectrum of six methodologies |
description |
The field of contextualisation is broad, with a vast diversity of definitions, models and methodologies. There are now many useful models of contextualisation from which to choose. But clearly, there is no one-size-fits-all solution – the diverse collection of options are not equally valid or useful or effective in all ministry contexts. How should one choose the best method for his or her ministry and context? This article argued that the ministry ‘context’ – the area, actors and activity of ministry – is the key determining factor for choosing the most effective contextualisation method for each ministry situation. The various contextualisation models and methods are based on the ministry context for which they are designed, as the constraints of each specific ministry context significantly influence the ideal contextualisation methodology. This article considered six distinct ministry contexts, each of which requires a different contextualisation methodology.
Contribution: This article contributed to the discussion of contextualisation methodologies. While there are many settled theories and methods in this area, there remains considerable divergence and disagreement around various contextualisation concepts and practices. This article provides a useful pedagogical framework for organising the various methods in order to aid the academic discussion as well as the practical application of these methods. |
format |
article |
author |
Brian A. DeVries |
author_facet |
Brian A. DeVries |
author_sort |
Brian A. DeVries |
title |
Contextualisation within context: A pedagogical spectrum of six methodologies |
title_short |
Contextualisation within context: A pedagogical spectrum of six methodologies |
title_full |
Contextualisation within context: A pedagogical spectrum of six methodologies |
title_fullStr |
Contextualisation within context: A pedagogical spectrum of six methodologies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Contextualisation within context: A pedagogical spectrum of six methodologies |
title_sort |
contextualisation within context: a pedagogical spectrum of six methodologies |
publisher |
AOSIS |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/d1b2663ff7ad41c3a42701cc939fc119 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT brianadevries contextualisationwithincontextapedagogicalspectrumofsixmethodologies |
_version_ |
1718415943718141952 |