Contextualisation within context: A pedagogical spectrum of six methodologies

The field of contextualisation is broad, with a vast diversity of definitions, models and methodologies. There are now many useful models of contextualisation from which to choose. But clearly, there is no one-size-fits-all solution – the diverse collection of options are not equally valid or useful...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Brian A. DeVries
Formato: article
Lenguaje:AF
EN
Publicado: AOSIS 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d1b2663ff7ad41c3a42701cc939fc119
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d1b2663ff7ad41c3a42701cc939fc119
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d1b2663ff7ad41c3a42701cc939fc1192021-11-24T07:40:42ZContextualisation within context: A pedagogical spectrum of six methodologies1018-64412305-085310.4102/ids.v55i1.2751https://doaj.org/article/d1b2663ff7ad41c3a42701cc939fc1192021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://indieskriflig.org.za/index.php/skriflig/article/view/2751https://doaj.org/toc/1018-6441https://doaj.org/toc/2305-0853The field of contextualisation is broad, with a vast diversity of definitions, models and methodologies. There are now many useful models of contextualisation from which to choose. But clearly, there is no one-size-fits-all solution – the diverse collection of options are not equally valid or useful or effective in all ministry contexts. How should one choose the best method for his or her ministry and context? This article argued that the ministry ‘context’ – the area, actors and activity of ministry – is the key determining factor for choosing the most effective contextualisation method for each ministry situation. The various contextualisation models and methods are based on the ministry context for which they are designed, as the constraints of each specific ministry context significantly influence the ideal contextualisation methodology. This article considered six distinct ministry contexts, each of which requires a different contextualisation methodology. Contribution: This article contributed to the discussion of contextualisation methodologies. While there are many settled theories and methods in this area, there remains considerable divergence and disagreement around various contextualisation concepts and practices. This article provides a useful pedagogical framework for organising the various methods in order to aid the academic discussion as well as the practical application of these methods.Brian A. DeVriesAOSISarticlecontextualisationmission methodologygospel and cultureintercultural theologieshermeneuticsincarnationtranslationindigenisationcontextual theologyintercultural ministryPractical TheologyBV1-5099Practical religion. The Christian lifeBV4485-5099AFENIn die Skriflig, Vol 55, Iss 1, Pp e1-e8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language AF
EN
topic contextualisation
mission methodology
gospel and culture
intercultural theologies
hermeneutics
incarnation
translation
indigenisation
contextual theology
intercultural ministry
Practical Theology
BV1-5099
Practical religion. The Christian life
BV4485-5099
spellingShingle contextualisation
mission methodology
gospel and culture
intercultural theologies
hermeneutics
incarnation
translation
indigenisation
contextual theology
intercultural ministry
Practical Theology
BV1-5099
Practical religion. The Christian life
BV4485-5099
Brian A. DeVries
Contextualisation within context: A pedagogical spectrum of six methodologies
description The field of contextualisation is broad, with a vast diversity of definitions, models and methodologies. There are now many useful models of contextualisation from which to choose. But clearly, there is no one-size-fits-all solution – the diverse collection of options are not equally valid or useful or effective in all ministry contexts. How should one choose the best method for his or her ministry and context? This article argued that the ministry ‘context’ – the area, actors and activity of ministry – is the key determining factor for choosing the most effective contextualisation method for each ministry situation. The various contextualisation models and methods are based on the ministry context for which they are designed, as the constraints of each specific ministry context significantly influence the ideal contextualisation methodology. This article considered six distinct ministry contexts, each of which requires a different contextualisation methodology. Contribution: This article contributed to the discussion of contextualisation methodologies. While there are many settled theories and methods in this area, there remains considerable divergence and disagreement around various contextualisation concepts and practices. This article provides a useful pedagogical framework for organising the various methods in order to aid the academic discussion as well as the practical application of these methods.
format article
author Brian A. DeVries
author_facet Brian A. DeVries
author_sort Brian A. DeVries
title Contextualisation within context: A pedagogical spectrum of six methodologies
title_short Contextualisation within context: A pedagogical spectrum of six methodologies
title_full Contextualisation within context: A pedagogical spectrum of six methodologies
title_fullStr Contextualisation within context: A pedagogical spectrum of six methodologies
title_full_unstemmed Contextualisation within context: A pedagogical spectrum of six methodologies
title_sort contextualisation within context: a pedagogical spectrum of six methodologies
publisher AOSIS
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/d1b2663ff7ad41c3a42701cc939fc119
work_keys_str_mv AT brianadevries contextualisationwithincontextapedagogicalspectrumofsixmethodologies
_version_ 1718415943718141952