Comparison of the complications between minimally invasive surgery and open surgical treatments for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
<h4>Background</h4>This meta-analysis comprehensively compared intraoperative and postoperative complications between minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and laparotomy in the management of cervical cancer. Even though the advantages of laparotomy over MIS in disease-free survival and overa...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Yilin Li, Qingduo Kong, Hongyi Wei, Yongjun Wang |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Language: | EN |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/d1c52462508c4beaae11a9beec2f1492 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Anatomical and surgical considerations for minimally invasive surgery of adnexal mass lesions
by: Pedro F. Escobar,, et al.
Published: (2005) -
Clinical Outcomes and Complications With Open vs Minimally Invasive Achilles Tendon Repair
by: Kristin C. Caolo BA, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Minimally invasive surgery
Published: (2010) -
Minimally invasive surgery versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Ahmed Bendary, et al.
Published: (2021) -
The Surgeon’s Proficiency Affected Survival Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Study of 851 Patients
by: Ying Yang, et al.
Published: (2021)