Effects of guideline-based training on the quality of formal ontologies: a randomized controlled trial.

<h4>Background</h4>The importance of ontologies in the biomedical domain is generally recognized. However, their quality is often too poor for large-scale use in critical applications, at least partially due to insufficient training of ontology developers.<h4>Objective</h4>To...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin Boeker, Ludger Jansen, Niels Grewe, Johannes Röhl, Daniel Schober, Djamila Seddig-Raufie, Stefan Schulz
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/d1c878ea82394b009cda77c5a8179ae1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:d1c878ea82394b009cda77c5a8179ae1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:d1c878ea82394b009cda77c5a8179ae12021-11-18T07:46:44ZEffects of guideline-based training on the quality of formal ontologies: a randomized controlled trial.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0061425https://doaj.org/article/d1c878ea82394b009cda77c5a8179ae12013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23667440/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>The importance of ontologies in the biomedical domain is generally recognized. However, their quality is often too poor for large-scale use in critical applications, at least partially due to insufficient training of ontology developers.<h4>Objective</h4>To show the efficacy of guideline-based ontology development training on the performance of ontology developers. The hypothesis was that students who received training on top-level ontologies and design patterns perform better than those who only received training in the basic principles of formal ontology engineering.<h4>Methods</h4>A curriculum was implemented based on a guideline for ontology design. A randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of this curriculum was performed with 24 students from bioinformatics and related fields. After joint training on the fundamentals of ontology development the students were randomly allocated to two groups. During the intervention, each group received training on different topics in ontology development. In the assessment phase, all students were asked to solve modeling problems on topics taught differentially in the intervention phase. Primary outcome was the similarity of the students' ontology artefacts compared with gold standard ontologies developed by the authors before the experiment; secondary outcome was the intra-group similarity of group members' ontologies.<h4>Results</h4>The experiment showed no significant effect of the guideline-based training on the performance of ontology developers (a) the ontologies developed after specific training were only slightly but not significantly closer to the gold standard ontologies than the ontologies developed without prior specific training; (b) although significant differences for certain ontologies were detected, the intra-group similarity was not consistently influenced in one direction by the differential training.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Methodologically limited, this study cannot be interpreted as a general failure of a guideline-based approach to ontology development. Further research is needed to increase insight into whether specific development guidelines and practices in ontology design are effective.Martin BoekerLudger JansenNiels GreweJohannes RöhlDaniel SchoberDjamila Seddig-RaufieStefan SchulzPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 5, p e61425 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Martin Boeker
Ludger Jansen
Niels Grewe
Johannes Röhl
Daniel Schober
Djamila Seddig-Raufie
Stefan Schulz
Effects of guideline-based training on the quality of formal ontologies: a randomized controlled trial.
description <h4>Background</h4>The importance of ontologies in the biomedical domain is generally recognized. However, their quality is often too poor for large-scale use in critical applications, at least partially due to insufficient training of ontology developers.<h4>Objective</h4>To show the efficacy of guideline-based ontology development training on the performance of ontology developers. The hypothesis was that students who received training on top-level ontologies and design patterns perform better than those who only received training in the basic principles of formal ontology engineering.<h4>Methods</h4>A curriculum was implemented based on a guideline for ontology design. A randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of this curriculum was performed with 24 students from bioinformatics and related fields. After joint training on the fundamentals of ontology development the students were randomly allocated to two groups. During the intervention, each group received training on different topics in ontology development. In the assessment phase, all students were asked to solve modeling problems on topics taught differentially in the intervention phase. Primary outcome was the similarity of the students' ontology artefacts compared with gold standard ontologies developed by the authors before the experiment; secondary outcome was the intra-group similarity of group members' ontologies.<h4>Results</h4>The experiment showed no significant effect of the guideline-based training on the performance of ontology developers (a) the ontologies developed after specific training were only slightly but not significantly closer to the gold standard ontologies than the ontologies developed without prior specific training; (b) although significant differences for certain ontologies were detected, the intra-group similarity was not consistently influenced in one direction by the differential training.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Methodologically limited, this study cannot be interpreted as a general failure of a guideline-based approach to ontology development. Further research is needed to increase insight into whether specific development guidelines and practices in ontology design are effective.
format article
author Martin Boeker
Ludger Jansen
Niels Grewe
Johannes Röhl
Daniel Schober
Djamila Seddig-Raufie
Stefan Schulz
author_facet Martin Boeker
Ludger Jansen
Niels Grewe
Johannes Röhl
Daniel Schober
Djamila Seddig-Raufie
Stefan Schulz
author_sort Martin Boeker
title Effects of guideline-based training on the quality of formal ontologies: a randomized controlled trial.
title_short Effects of guideline-based training on the quality of formal ontologies: a randomized controlled trial.
title_full Effects of guideline-based training on the quality of formal ontologies: a randomized controlled trial.
title_fullStr Effects of guideline-based training on the quality of formal ontologies: a randomized controlled trial.
title_full_unstemmed Effects of guideline-based training on the quality of formal ontologies: a randomized controlled trial.
title_sort effects of guideline-based training on the quality of formal ontologies: a randomized controlled trial.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/d1c878ea82394b009cda77c5a8179ae1
work_keys_str_mv AT martinboeker effectsofguidelinebasedtrainingonthequalityofformalontologiesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ludgerjansen effectsofguidelinebasedtrainingonthequalityofformalontologiesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nielsgrewe effectsofguidelinebasedtrainingonthequalityofformalontologiesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT johannesrohl effectsofguidelinebasedtrainingonthequalityofformalontologiesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT danielschober effectsofguidelinebasedtrainingonthequalityofformalontologiesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT djamilaseddigraufie effectsofguidelinebasedtrainingonthequalityofformalontologiesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stefanschulz effectsofguidelinebasedtrainingonthequalityofformalontologiesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1718423003224604672