How to Dispel the Asymmetry Concerning Retraction

MacFarlane (2014) advocates a radical form of semantic relativism. He argues that his proposal complies with the norms governing our assertion practices in various areas of discourse. These practices also include norms regarding the conditions in which it is inappropriate not to retract an assertio...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Diogo Santos
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FR IT
Publicado:	Rosenberg & Sellier 2017
Materias:	retraction assessment-sensitivity Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/d1f854e162774904b55c7e6cce7d7753
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:d1f854e162774904b55c7e6cce7d7753
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:d1f854e162774904b55c7e6cce7d77532021-12-02T12:01:57ZHow to Dispel the Asymmetry Concerning Retraction10.13128/Phe_Mi-211072280-78532239-4028https://doaj.org/article/d1f854e162774904b55c7e6cce7d77532017-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7267https://doaj.org/toc/2280-7853https://doaj.org/toc/2239-4028 MacFarlane (2014) advocates a radical form of semantic relativism. He argues that his proposal complies with the norms governing our assertion practices in various areas of discourse. These practices also include norms regarding the conditions in which it is inappropriate not to retract an assertion. Ferrari & Zeman (2014) identify an asymmetry concerning retractions in two relevant areas of discourse and argue that assessment-sensitivity needs to be supplemented with further theoretical tools to explain it. I dispel the asymmetry and conclude that assessment-sensitivity needs no supplementation to account for it. Diogo SantosRosenberg & Sellierarticleretractionassessment-sensitivityAestheticsBH1-301EthicsBJ1-1725ENFRITPhenomenology and Mind, Iss 12 (2017)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FR IT
topic	retraction assessment-sensitivity Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725
spellingShingle	retraction assessment-sensitivity Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725 Diogo Santos How to Dispel the Asymmetry Concerning Retraction
description	MacFarlane (2014) advocates a radical form of semantic relativism. He argues that his proposal complies with the norms governing our assertion practices in various areas of discourse. These practices also include norms regarding the conditions in which it is inappropriate not to retract an assertion. Ferrari & Zeman (2014) identify an asymmetry concerning retractions in two relevant areas of discourse and argue that assessment-sensitivity needs to be supplemented with further theoretical tools to explain it. I dispel the asymmetry and conclude that assessment-sensitivity needs no supplementation to account for it.
format	article
author	Diogo Santos
author_facet	Diogo Santos
author_sort	Diogo Santos
title	How to Dispel the Asymmetry Concerning Retraction
title_short	How to Dispel the Asymmetry Concerning Retraction
title_full	How to Dispel the Asymmetry Concerning Retraction
title_fullStr	How to Dispel the Asymmetry Concerning Retraction
title_full_unstemmed	How to Dispel the Asymmetry Concerning Retraction
title_sort	how to dispel the asymmetry concerning retraction
publisher	Rosenberg & Sellier
publishDate	2017
url	https://doaj.org/article/d1f854e162774904b55c7e6cce7d7753
work_keys_str_mv	AT diogosantos howtodispeltheasymmetryconcerningretraction
_version_	1718394777715605504

How to Dispel the Asymmetry Concerning Retraction

Ejemplares similares