Evaluation of Class II restoration microleakage with various restorative materials: A comparative In vitro study

Background and Objectives: The quest for a suitable esthetic material for tooth restoration has resulted in significant advancements in both material properties and application technique. Composites and acid-etch procedures are two significant advancements in esthetic restorative dentistry. Further...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Madhura Pawar, Muhammad Atif Saleem Agwan, Bushra Ghani, Megha Khatri, Pooja Bopache, Mian Salman Aziz
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021
Materias:	amalgam equi forte fill g-aenial posterior g-aenial universal flo gingival microleakage stereomicroscope Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/d1f9a4ea66924a86ac8385796ea01550
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:d1f9a4ea66924a86ac8385796ea01550
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:d1f9a4ea66924a86ac8385796ea015502021-11-19T12:15:52ZEvaluation of Class II restoration microleakage with various restorative materials: A comparative In vitro study0975-740610.4103/jpbs.jpbs_359_21https://doaj.org/article/d1f9a4ea66924a86ac8385796ea015502021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=1210;epage=1214;aulast=Pawarhttps://doaj.org/toc/0975-7406Background and Objectives: The quest for a suitable esthetic material for tooth restoration has resulted in significant advancements in both material properties and application technique. Composites and acid-etch procedures are two significant advancements in esthetic restorative dentistry. Further research has strengthened composites' overall wear resistance and strength, but the problem of polymerization shrinkage has persisted. To reduce polymerization shrinkage and microleakage, a variety of techniques and material modifications have been suggested. The marginal leakage of amalgam, packable composite, flowable composite with packable composite, and high-viscosity traditional glass ionomer cement (GIC) was compared in this analysis to test the mentioned hypothesis. Materials and Methods: We chose 60 freshly extracted teeth and divided them into four classes of 15 teeth each. Class II cavities were prepared in a standardized manner. Group I was treated with amalgam, Group II with packable composite (GC G-aenial Posterior), Group III with flowable composite (G-aenial Universal Flo) as a liner and then restored with packable composite (GC G-aenial Posterior), and Group IV with high-viscosity traditional GIC (EQUI FORTE FILL). After that, the restorations were put through a thermocycling process. The specimens were soaked in 0.5% methylene blue dye before being cut into mesiodistal sections to assess microleakage at the gingival margin. After that, the parts were examined under a stereomicroscope. The degree of dye penetration was used to determine the score. Results: There was no microleakage in the control group, and the gap between the control and experimental groups was statistically significant (P = 0.017). Conclusion: The glass hybrid restorative device had less gingival microleakage than the resin-based restorative material, indicating that it has a better sealing capacity. Clinical acceptability of glass hybrid restorative systems, on the other hand, must be confirmed with a larger sample size and in vivo trials.Madhura PawarMuhammad Atif Saleem AgwanBushra GhaniMegha KhatriPooja BopacheMian Salman AzizWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsarticleamalgamequi forte fillg-aenial posteriorg-aenial universal flogingival microleakagestereomicroscopePharmacy and materia medicaRS1-441Analytical chemistryQD71-142ENJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 6, Pp 1210-1214 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	amalgam equi forte fill g-aenial posterior g-aenial universal flo gingival microleakage stereomicroscope Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142
spellingShingle	amalgam equi forte fill g-aenial posterior g-aenial universal flo gingival microleakage stereomicroscope Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142 Madhura Pawar Muhammad Atif Saleem Agwan Bushra Ghani Megha Khatri Pooja Bopache Mian Salman Aziz Evaluation of Class II restoration microleakage with various restorative materials: A comparative In vitro study
description	Background and Objectives: The quest for a suitable esthetic material for tooth restoration has resulted in significant advancements in both material properties and application technique. Composites and acid-etch procedures are two significant advancements in esthetic restorative dentistry. Further research has strengthened composites' overall wear resistance and strength, but the problem of polymerization shrinkage has persisted. To reduce polymerization shrinkage and microleakage, a variety of techniques and material modifications have been suggested. The marginal leakage of amalgam, packable composite, flowable composite with packable composite, and high-viscosity traditional glass ionomer cement (GIC) was compared in this analysis to test the mentioned hypothesis. Materials and Methods: We chose 60 freshly extracted teeth and divided them into four classes of 15 teeth each. Class II cavities were prepared in a standardized manner. Group I was treated with amalgam, Group II with packable composite (GC G-aenial Posterior), Group III with flowable composite (G-aenial Universal Flo) as a liner and then restored with packable composite (GC G-aenial Posterior), and Group IV with high-viscosity traditional GIC (EQUI FORTE FILL). After that, the restorations were put through a thermocycling process. The specimens were soaked in 0.5% methylene blue dye before being cut into mesiodistal sections to assess microleakage at the gingival margin. After that, the parts were examined under a stereomicroscope. The degree of dye penetration was used to determine the score. Results: There was no microleakage in the control group, and the gap between the control and experimental groups was statistically significant (P = 0.017). Conclusion: The glass hybrid restorative device had less gingival microleakage than the resin-based restorative material, indicating that it has a better sealing capacity. Clinical acceptability of glass hybrid restorative systems, on the other hand, must be confirmed with a larger sample size and in vivo trials.
format	article
author	Madhura Pawar Muhammad Atif Saleem Agwan Bushra Ghani Megha Khatri Pooja Bopache Mian Salman Aziz
author_facet	Madhura Pawar Muhammad Atif Saleem Agwan Bushra Ghani Megha Khatri Pooja Bopache Mian Salman Aziz
author_sort	Madhura Pawar
title	Evaluation of Class II restoration microleakage with various restorative materials: A comparative In vitro study
title_short	Evaluation of Class II restoration microleakage with various restorative materials: A comparative In vitro study
title_full	Evaluation of Class II restoration microleakage with various restorative materials: A comparative In vitro study
title_fullStr	Evaluation of Class II restoration microleakage with various restorative materials: A comparative In vitro study
title_full_unstemmed	Evaluation of Class II restoration microleakage with various restorative materials: A comparative In vitro study
title_sort	evaluation of class ii restoration microleakage with various restorative materials: a comparative in vitro study
publisher	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/d1f9a4ea66924a86ac8385796ea01550
work_keys_str_mv	AT madhurapawar evaluationofclassiirestorationmicroleakagewithvariousrestorativematerialsacomparativeinvitrostudy AT muhammadatifsaleemagwan evaluationofclassiirestorationmicroleakagewithvariousrestorativematerialsacomparativeinvitrostudy AT bushraghani evaluationofclassiirestorationmicroleakagewithvariousrestorativematerialsacomparativeinvitrostudy AT meghakhatri evaluationofclassiirestorationmicroleakagewithvariousrestorativematerialsacomparativeinvitrostudy AT poojabopache evaluationofclassiirestorationmicroleakagewithvariousrestorativematerialsacomparativeinvitrostudy AT miansalmanaziz evaluationofclassiirestorationmicroleakagewithvariousrestorativematerialsacomparativeinvitrostudy
_version_	1718420160085229568

Evaluation of Class II restoration microleakage with various restorative materials: A comparative In vitro study

Ejemplares similares